AIMS: To compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on functional capacity and cardiometabolic markers in individuals prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: The search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, PEDro, CENTRAL, Scopus, LILACS database, and Clinical Trials from the inception to July 2017, included randomized clinical trials that compared the use of HIIT and MICT in prediabetes and T2D adults. The risk of bias was defined by Cochrane Handbook and quality of evidence by GRADE. RESULTS: From 818 relevant records, seven studies were included in systematic review (64 prediabetes and 120 T2D patients) and five with T2D were meta-analyzed. HIIT promoted significantly increased of 3.02 mL/kg/min (CI95% 1.42-4.61) of VO2max, measured for functional capacity, compared to MICT. No differences were found between two modalities of exercises considering the outcomes HbA1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, and waist-to-hip ratio. Most of the studies presented unclear risk of bias, and low and very low quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: HIIT induces cardiometabolic adaptations similar to those of MICT in prediabetes and T2D, and provides greater benefits to functional capacity in patients with T2D. PROSPERO: CRD42016047151.
AIMS: To compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on functional capacity and cardiometabolic markers in individuals prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: The search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, PEDro, CENTRAL, Scopus, LILACS database, and Clinical Trials from the inception to July 2017, included randomized clinical trials that compared the use of HIIT and MICT in prediabetes and T2D adults. The risk of bias was defined by Cochrane Handbook and quality of evidence by GRADE. RESULTS: From 818 relevant records, seven studies were included in systematic review (64 prediabetes and 120 T2D patients) and five with T2D were meta-analyzed. HIIT promoted significantly increased of 3.02 mL/kg/min (CI95% 1.42-4.61) of VO2max, measured for functional capacity, compared to MICT. No differences were found between two modalities of exercises considering the outcomes HbA1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, and waist-to-hip ratio. Most of the studies presented unclear risk of bias, and low and very low quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: HIIT induces cardiometabolic adaptations similar to those of MICT in prediabetes and T2D, and provides greater benefits to functional capacity in patients with T2D. PROSPERO: CRD42016047151.
Authors: Gabriela de Oliveira Teles; Carini Silva da Silva; Vinicius Ramos Rezende; Ana Cristina Silva Rebelo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Dustin W Davis; James W Navalta; Graham R McGinnis; Reimund Serafica; Kenneth Izuora; Arpita Basu Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: M E Jung; S R Locke; J E Bourne; M R Beauchamp; T Lee; J Singer; M MacPherson; J Barry; C Jones; J P Little Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ansgar Thiel; Gorden Sudeck; Hannes Gropper; Felipe Mattioni Maturana; Tanja Schubert; Duangkamol Srismith; Manuel Widmann; Simone Behrens; Peter Martus; Barbara Munz; Katrin Giel; Stephan Zipfel; Andreas Michael Nieß Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2019-12-17
Authors: Ismael Ballesta-García; Ignacio Martínez-González-Moro; Jacobo Á Rubio-Arias; María Carrasco-Poyatos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.390