Literature DB >> 29329470

[The Epidemiology of Pressure Ulcer in Germany: Systematic Review].

Tsenka Tomova-Simitchieva1, Merve Akdeniz1, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi1, Nils Lahmann2, Jan Kottner1.   

Abstract

BACKROUND: Pressure ulcers are considered as indicators of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in Germany between 2010 and 2015.
METHODS: The databases PubMed, CINAHL, DIMDI, Web of Science, LIVIVO, Google, Google Scholar, as well as the publishers Springer and the Thieme were searched until the end of February 2016. The extracted data were monitored by two reviewers. A risk of bias assessment was conducted.
RESULTS: 219 epidemiologic figures were found in 67 studies and documents. Most data were identified for the hospital setting. The majority of figures in long-term care was based on primary research. Considering sources of high methodological quality, prevalence in long-term care varied between 2% and 5% and between 2% to 4% in hospitals (category 2 and above). Routine data collections showed heterogeneous results from the hospital settings with prevalence from 0.07% to 4.37%. No incidence figures and no routine data collections were identified for ambulatory settings. Prevalence varied between 2 and 4% (including category 1).
CONCLUSION: Review results indicate that pressure ulcers are frequent within all health care settings in Germany. Disregarding methodological limitations, pressure ulcer prevalence is between 2% and 5% in long-term care patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, generalizable statements are not possible for the hospital settings. Pressure ulcer prevalence is most likely at least 2%. Results indicate that pressure ulcer preventive measures need to be improved in Germany. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29329470     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  7 in total

1.  Improving the quality of pressure ulcer management in a skilled nursing facility.

Authors:  Yunghan Au; Mary Holbrook; Adam Skeens; Jessica Painter; James McBurney; Amy Cassata; Sheila C Wang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  [Pressure sores-A multilayered challenge].

Authors:  Romana Lenzen-Großimlinghaus
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Jie Song; Yuan Gao; Pengbin Yin; Yi Li; Yang Li; Jie Zhang; Qingqing Su; Xiaojie Fu; Hongying Pi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 4.  [Recognition and correct classification of pressure ulcers: a position paper].

Authors:  J Kottner; K Kröger; V Gerber; G Schröder; J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Prevalence of risk for pressure ulcers, malnutrition, poor oral health and falls - a register study among older persons receiving municipal health care in southern Sweden.

Authors:  Merita Neziraj; Peter Hellman; Christine Kumlien; Magdalena Andersson; Malin Axelsson
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Cost-effectiveness of multi-layered silicone foam dressings for prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in high-risk intensive care unit patients: An economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Monira El Genedy; Elisabeth Hahnel; Tsenka Tomova-Simitchieva; William V Padula; Armin Hauß; Nils Löber; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Factors affecting the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in COVID-19 patients admitted with a Braden scale below 14 in the intensive care unit: Retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mahin Amini; Feizollah Mansouri; Kamran Vafaee; Alireza Janbakhsh; Somayeh Mahdavikian; Yasaman Moradi; Masoud Fallahi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.099

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.