J Kottner1, K Kröger2, V Gerber3, G Schröder4, J Dissemond5. 1. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland. 2. Klinik für Angiologie, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Deutschland. 3. Initative Chronische Wunden e. V., Quedlinburg, Deutschland. 4. Akademie für Wundversorgung, Göttingen, Deutschland. 5. Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. joachim.dissemond@uk-essen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers comprise serious skin and tissue damage. The correct diagnosis and classification into different categories is often difficult in daily practice. QUESTION: What procedure can be recommended to correctly diagnose and classify pressure ulcers in practice? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The society Initiative Chronische Wunden (ICW) e. V. established a group of experts who developed practical recommendations for the diagnosis and classification of pressure ulcers based on the current literature and their own expertise. RESULTS: Pressure ulcers should only be diagnosed if skin and/or tissue damage is most likely due to prolonged pressure or pressure associated with shear forces. A complete anamnesis must be performed to detect periods of previous prolonged immobility. Pressure ulcers are usually located at typical predilection sites. For category I and "suspected deep tissue damage" the tissue damage occurs under (initially) intact skin. However, the diagnosis is uncertain and the classification should be made later. The category II pressure ulcer is usually an exclusion diagnosis. The categories III and IV are pressure ulcers in the proper sense. As long as the distinction between category III and IV is not possible, the lower category should be coded. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, a relevant classification should be used uniformly for the respective setting. In accordance with the clinical picture, a most suitable diagnosis is to be made. It does not matter which classification system is used. The future WHO ICD-11 version will allow better classification of pressure ulcers.
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers comprise serious skin and tissue damage. The correct diagnosis and classification into different categories is often difficult in daily practice. QUESTION: What procedure can be recommended to correctly diagnose and classify pressure ulcers in practice? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The society Initiative Chronische Wunden (ICW) e. V. established a group of experts who developed practical recommendations for the diagnosis and classification of pressure ulcers based on the current literature and their own expertise. RESULTS: Pressure ulcers should only be diagnosed if skin and/or tissue damage is most likely due to prolonged pressure or pressure associated with shear forces. A complete anamnesis must be performed to detect periods of previous prolonged immobility. Pressure ulcers are usually located at typical predilection sites. For category I and "suspected deep tissue damage" the tissue damage occurs under (initially) intact skin. However, the diagnosis is uncertain and the classification should be made later. The category II pressure ulcer is usually an exclusion diagnosis. The categories III and IV are pressure ulcers in the proper sense. As long as the distinction between category III and IV is not possible, the lower category should be coded. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, a relevant classification should be used uniformly for the respective setting. In accordance with the clinical picture, a most suitable diagnosis is to be made. It does not matter which classification system is used. The future WHO ICD-11 version will allow better classification of pressure ulcers.