Literature DB >> 29327389

Multivariate analysis of variations in intrinsic foot musculature among hominoids.

Motoharu Oishi1, Naomichi Ogihara2, Daisuke Shimizu3, Yasuhiro Kikuchi4, Hideki Endo5, Yumi Une6, Satoshi Soeta7, Hajime Amasaki7, Nobutsune Ichihara1.   

Abstract

Comparative analysis of the foot muscle architecture among extant great apes is important for understanding the evolution of the human foot and, hence, human habitual bipedal walking. However, to our knowledge, there is no previous report of a quantitative comparison of hominoid intrinsic foot muscle dimensions. In the present study, we quantitatively compared muscle dimensions of the hominoid foot by means of multivariate analysis. The foot muscle mass and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of five chimpanzees, one bonobo, two gorillas, and six orangutans were obtained by our own dissections, and those of humans were taken from published accounts. The muscle mass and PCSA were respectively divided by the total mass and total PCSA of the intrinsic muscles of the entire foot for normalization. Variations in muscle architecture among human and extant great apes were quantified based on principal component analysis. Our results demonstrated that the muscle architecture of the orangutan was the most distinctive, having a larger first dorsal interosseous muscle and smaller abductor hallucis brevis muscle. On the other hand, the gorilla was found to be unique in having a larger abductor digiti minimi muscle. Humans were distinguished from extant great apes by a larger quadratus plantae muscle. The chimpanzee and the bonobo appeared to have very similar muscle architecture, with an intermediate position between the human and the orangutan. These differences (or similarities) in architecture of the intrinsic foot muscles among humans and great apes correspond well to the differences in phylogeny, positional behavior, and locomotion.
© 2018 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  great apes; human; physiological cross-sectional area; principal component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29327389      PMCID: PMC5879964          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  48 in total

Review 1.  How musculotendon architecture and joint geometry affect the capacity of muscles to move and exert force on objects: a review with application to arm and forearm tendon transfer design.

Authors:  F E Zajac
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Comparative Anatomy of the Muscles and Nerves of the Superior and Inferior Extremities of the Anthropoid Apes: Part II.

Authors:  D Hepburn
Journal:  J Anat Physiol       Date:  1892-04

3.  Combining prehension and propulsion: the foot of Ardipithecus ramidus.

Authors:  C Owen Lovejoy; Bruce Latimer; Gen Suwa; Berhane Asfaw; Tim D White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Dimensions of forelimb muscles in orangutans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Motoharu Oishi; Naomichi Ogihara; Hideki Endo; Nobutsune Ichihara; Masao Asari
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Muscle architecture of the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): perspectives for investigating chimpanzee behavior.

Authors:  Kristian J Carlson
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  Dynamic plantar pressure distribution during terrestrial locomotion of bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  Evie Vereecke; Kristiaan D'Août; Dirk De Clercq; Linda Van Elsacker; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Relationship between muscle fiber types and sizes and muscle architectural properties in the mouse hindlimb.

Authors:  T J Burkholder; B Fingado; S Baron; R L Lieber
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.804

8.  Complete fourth metatarsal and arches in the foot of Australopithecus afarensis.

Authors:  Carol V Ward; William H Kimbel; Donald C Johanson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The potential of human toe flexor muscles to produce force.

Authors:  Jan-Peter Goldmann; Gert-Peter Brüggemann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Sex differences in adult chimpanzee positional behavior: the influence of body size on locomotion and posture.

Authors:  D M Doran
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.868

View more
  1 in total

1.  Flexor digitorum brevis utilizes elastic strain energy to contribute to both work generation and energy absorption at the foot.

Authors:  Ross E Smith; Glen A Lichtwark; Luke A Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.308

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.