Literature DB >> 1401783

How musculotendon architecture and joint geometry affect the capacity of muscles to move and exert force on objects: a review with application to arm and forearm tendon transfer design.

F E Zajac1.   

Abstract

This commentary reviews musculotendon architecture and the relation between architectural parameters and the force, speed, and excursion capacity of musculotendon units. It is hoped that this review will help provide the framework within which to appreciate the importance of the data presented by Lieber et al. Muscle fiber pennation hardly affects musculotendon output of forearm and hand muscles. Instead, physiologic cross-sectional area and muscle fiber length affect force capacity and speed and excursion capacity, respectively. How muscles with equal mass can have different force, speed, and excursion capacities is explained. Since the moment arm of a muscle (the shortest distance from the musculotendon unit to the joint center of rotation) transforms muscle output into musculotendon output, it is shown why the capacity for a muscle to exert force on an object, as during grasping, is directly proportional to its moment arm and why the range of joint movement and speed over which muscles exert force is inversely proportional to the moment arm. Finally, tendon, being not stiff in forearm and hand musculotendon units, also affects their output. Criteria are given for designing tendon transfer reconstructions from architectural data and moment arm data to best replicate the biomechanical function of the replaced muscle. To have the same capacity for imparting movement to objects and exerting force on them, the donor muscle should have the same moment arm/physiologic cross-sectional area product, the same fiber length/moment arm ratio, and the same tendon length/muscle fiber length ratio as the replaced muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1401783     DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90445-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  35 in total

1.  Functional adaptations in the forelimb muscles of non-human great apes.

Authors:  Julia P Myatt; Robin H Crompton; Rachel C Payne-Davis; Evie E Vereecke; Karin Isler; Russell Savage; Kristiaan D'Août; Michael M Günther; Susannah K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Tibialis anterior architecture, strength, and gait in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Daniel C Bland; Laura A Prosser; Lindsey A Bellini; Katharine E Alter; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Coupling between mechanical and neural behaviour in the human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  Anna L Hudson; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia; Jane E Butler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Ankle morphology amplifies calcaneus movement relative to triceps surae muscle shortening.

Authors:  R Csapo; J Hodgson; R Kinugasa; V R Edgerton; S Sinha
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-06-06

5.  Dimensions of forelimb muscles in orangutans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Motoharu Oishi; Naomichi Ogihara; Hideki Endo; Nobutsune Ichihara; Masao Asari
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Hindlimb muscle architecture in non-human great apes and a comparison of methods for analysing inter-species variation.

Authors:  Julia P Myatt; Robin H Crompton; Susannah K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Wrist salvage procedures alter moment arms of the primary wrist muscles.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Michael S Bednar; Robert M Havey; Wendy M Murray
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  The estimated mechanical advantage of the prosimian ankle joint musculature, and implications for locomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ryosuke Goto; Hiroo Kumakura
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Functional anatomy of the gibbon forelimb: adaptations to a brachiating lifestyle.

Authors:  Fana Michilsens; Evie E Vereecke; Kristiaan D'Août; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Mechanical constraints on the functional morphology of the gibbon hind limb.

Authors:  Anthony J Channon; Michael M Günther; Robin H Crompton; Evie E Vereecke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.