Kyra Kimberly Kieskamp1, Rachel Rogers Worley2, Eva D McLanahan3, Marc-André Verner4. 1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Université de Montréal Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Montreal, Canada; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: kyrakieskamp@hotmail.com. 2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: idz7@cdc.gov. 3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: yjp8@cdc.gov. 4. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Université de Montréal Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: marc-andre.verner.1@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple agencies have developed health-based toxicity values for exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Although PFOA exposure occurs in utero and through breastfeeding, current health-based toxicity values have not been derived using fetal or child dosimetry. Therefore, current values may underestimate the potential risks to fetuses and nursing infants. OBJECTIVE: Using fetal and child dosimetry, we aimed to calculate PFOA maternal human equivalent doses (HEDs), corresponding to a developmental mouse study lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL, 1mg/kg/day). Further, we investigated the impact of breastfeeding duration and PFOA half-life on the estimated HEDs. METHODS: First, a pharmacokinetic model of pregnancy and lactation in mice was used to estimate plasma PFOA levels in pups following a maternal exposure to 1mg PFOA/kg/day for gestational days 1-17. Four plasma PFOA concentration metrics were estimated in pups: i) average prenatal; ii) average postnatal; iii) average overall (prenatal and postnatal); and iv) maximum. Then, Monte Carlo simulations were performed using a pharmacokinetic model of pregnancy and lactation in humans to generate distributions of maternal HEDs that would result in fetal/child plasma levels equivalent to those estimated in pups using the mouse model. Median (HED50) and 1st percentile (HED01) of calculated HEDs were calculated. RESULTS: Estimated PFOA maternal HED50s ranged from 3.0×10-4 to 1.1×10-3mg/kg/day and HED01s ranged from 4.7×10-5 to 2.1×10-4mg/kg/day. All calculated HEDs were lower than the HED based on adult dosimetry derived by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (5.3×10-3mg/kg/day). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that fetal/child dosimetry should be considered when deriving health-based toxicity values for potential developmental toxicants.
BACKGROUND: Multiple agencies have developed health-based toxicity values for exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Although PFOA exposure occurs in utero and through breastfeeding, current health-based toxicity values have not been derived using fetal or child dosimetry. Therefore, current values may underestimate the potential risks to fetuses and nursing infants. OBJECTIVE: Using fetal and child dosimetry, we aimed to calculate PFOA maternal human equivalent doses (HEDs), corresponding to a developmental mouse study lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL, 1mg/kg/day). Further, we investigated the impact of breastfeeding duration and PFOA half-life on the estimated HEDs. METHODS: First, a pharmacokinetic model of pregnancy and lactation in mice was used to estimate plasma PFOA levels in pups following a maternal exposure to 1mg PFOA/kg/day for gestational days 1-17. Four plasma PFOA concentration metrics were estimated in pups: i) average prenatal; ii) average postnatal; iii) average overall (prenatal and postnatal); and iv) maximum. Then, Monte Carlo simulations were performed using a pharmacokinetic model of pregnancy and lactation in humans to generate distributions of maternal HEDs that would result in fetal/child plasma levels equivalent to those estimated in pups using the mouse model. Median (HED50) and 1st percentile (HED01) of calculated HEDs were calculated. RESULTS: Estimated PFOA maternal HED50s ranged from 3.0×10-4 to 1.1×10-3mg/kg/day and HED01s ranged from 4.7×10-5 to 2.1×10-4mg/kg/day. All calculated HEDs were lower than the HED based on adult dosimetry derived by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (5.3×10-3mg/kg/day). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that fetal/child dosimetry should be considered when deriving health-based toxicity values for potential developmental toxicants.
Authors: Christopher Lau; Julie R Thibodeaux; Roger G Hanson; Michael G Narotsky; John M Rogers; Andrew B Lindstrom; Mark J Strynar Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2006-01-16 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Madisa B Macon; LaTonya R Villanueva; Katoria Tatum-Gibbs; Robert D Zehr; Mark J Strynar; Jason P Stanko; Sally S White; Laurence Helfant; Suzanne E Fenton Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2011-04-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Marc-André Verner; Gérard Ngueta; Elizabeth T Jensen; Hermann Fromme; Wolfgang Völkel; Unni Cecilie Nygaard; Berit Granum; Matthew P Longnecker Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Cynthia J Wolf; Suzanne E Fenton; Judith E Schmid; Antonia M Calafat; Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; Xavier A Bryant; Julie Thibodeaux; Kaberi P Das; Sally S White; Christopher S Lau; Barbara D Abbott Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2006-11-10 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Scott M Bartell; Antonia M Calafat; Christopher Lyu; Kayoko Kato; P Barry Ryan; Kyle Steenland Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Berit Granum; Line S Haug; Ellen Namork; Solvor B Stølevik; Cathrine Thomsen; Ingeborg S Aaberge; Henk van Loveren; Martinus Løvik; Unni C Nygaard Journal: J Immunotoxicol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Philippe Grandjean; Carsten Heilmann; Pal Weihe; Flemming Nielsen; Ulla B Mogensen; Esben Budtz-Jørgensen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Judy S LaKind; Marc-André Verner; Rachel D Rogers; Helen Goeden; Daniel Q Naiman; Satori A Marchitti; Geniece M Lehmann; Erin P Hines; Suzanne E Fenton Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 9.031