| Literature DB >> 29324792 |
Norbert Cibicek1, Jiri Ehrmann2, Jitka Proskova3, Rostislav Vecera4.
Abstract
Sensors able to record large bowel physiology and biochemistry in situ in awake rodents are lacking. Microdialysis is a mini-invasive technique that may be utilized to continuously deliver or recover low-molecular substances from various tissues. In this experiment we evaluated the feasibility of in vivo microdialysis to monitor extracellular fluid chemistry in the descending colon submucosa of conscious, freely moving rodents. Following surgical implantation of a microdialysis probe, male Wistar rats were housed in metabolic cages where they were analgized and clinically followed for four days with free access to standard diet and water. To assess local microcirculation and probe function, glucose, lactate, glucose-to-lactate ratio and urea clearance were determined in the dialysates from the three postoperative days with focus on the final 24-h period. In an attempt to mitigate the expected tissue inflammatory response, one group of animals had the catheters perfused with 5-aminosalicylic acid-enriched medium with final concentration 1 μmol/L. For verification of probe position and the assessment of the surrounding foreign body reaction, standard histological and immunohistochemical methods were employed. Microdialysis of rat gut is associated with considerable technical challenges that may lead to the loss of probe function and high drop-out rate. In this setting, limited data did not allow to draw any firm conclusion regarding local anti-inflammatory effectiveness of 5-aminosalicylic acid perfusion. Although intestinal microdialysis may be suitable for larger anesthetized animals, low reproducibility of the presented method compromises its routine experimental use in awake and freely moving small-sized rodents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324792 PMCID: PMC5764360 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Experimental design.
Sampling pattern reflected our interest in the fourth 24-h period (day 4). Information from preceding time periods was intentionally restricted to two solitary measurements.
Summary of experimental challenges.
| Reason of failure | No. of animals | Relative No. of animals |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 out of 20 enrolled and operated | |
| 7 | 7 out of 17 survivors | |
| 7 | 3 out of 10 with normal dialysate flow | |
| 12 | 6 out of 7 with normal medium flow and correct sensor position |
aAutopsy was not performed in four animals that died or were euthanized in the first two to three days of experiment.
bOther significant findings included soft stools, ileus or stercolith, seroma, arterial aneurysm or intraperitoneal abscess.
cSoft stools or mild subcutaneous seroma, albeit classified as significant findings, were not considered clinically severe. They were present in two animals out of seven with normal dialysate flow and catheter position, so finally three animals remained in the experiment instead of one.
Fig 2Microdialysis data.
Panels a-d depict data from three eligible animals (one from group A with perfusate A and two from group B with anti-inflammatory perfusate B). Data are displayed as individual measurements per time interval. RDurea (%) was expressed as median (min-max) of values obtained on day 4. Symbols denote: *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 vs. rat A. Statistical approach was restricted to the evaluation of inter-individual differences owing to low number of subjects. Possible effect of 5-ASA (perfusate B) could not be determined. Due to ethical reasons the attempts to harvest more data were discontinued.
Correlations between microdialysis parameters.
| Correlation between parameters | Urea | RDurea |
|---|---|---|
| r value (95% CI) | r value (95% CI) | |
| • Glucose | 0.352 (-0.021 to 0.639) | -0.306 (-0.639 to 0.124) |
| • Lactate-to-glucose ratio | -0.337 (-0.629 to 0.038) | 0.354 (-0.070 to 0.670) |
In the eligible animals (A, B1 and B2), no significant correlations between glucose, lactate-to-glucose ratio, urea and RDurea could be observed (p>0.05). Abbreviations: CI–confidence interval, RDurea−relative delivery of urea.
Animal physiology.
| Day | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter (unit) | Water intake (mL/kgb.wt./24h) | Feed consumption (g/kgb.wt./24h) | Stools water content (%) | Abs. body wt. (g) | ||||||||||
| 0.0 | 102 | 81.0 | 58.5 | 6.2 | 12.1 | 15.9 | 29.1 | - | 44.7 | 46.5 | 47.9 | 382 | 364 | |
| 0.0 | 194 | 91.1 | 109 | 5.8 | 17.8 | 32.7 | 30.2 | - | 57.5 | 57.0 | 45.1 | 361 | 352 | |
| 101 | 112 | 57.0 | 77.7 | 10.5 | 24.8 | 33.6 | 41.7 | 37.7 | 47.7 | 60.0 | 49.1 | 359 | 358 | |
Due to low number of subjects, statistical evaluation was not performed, and data were expressed as individual measurements. In compliance with ethical principles, experiments attempting to harvest more data were not continued.
Fig 3Morphological studies.
Panels a1-5 illustrate macroscopic (mucosal, serosal) and microscopic (HE, Alcian Blue and iNOS) views of probe implantation site in the descending colon, respectively, of rat A, whereas b1-5 depict rat B2 tissues. The pictures show mixed (polynuclear + lymphocyte) inflammatory infiltration and submucosal granuloma formation of comparable magnitude with preserved goblet cells (Alcian blue positivity) and negative (rat A) to mild (rat B2) iNOS reactivity. Due to the low number of subjects, possible effect of 5-ASA in perfusate B could not be determined. Arrows point to the microdialysis probes (a2, b2) or their cross-sections (a3-5, b3-5, tissue processing artifacts are observable in a5 and b5).
Routine biochemistry and hematology.
| Parameter | Glucose | Lactate | Urea | WBC | RBC | HGB | HCT | PLT | MCV | MCH | MCHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.6–11 | no data | 4.0–8.2 | 3.0–15 | 5.0–12 | 11.1–18.0 | 36–52 | 140–600 | 44–69 | 12.0–24.5 | 21.6–42.0 | |||
| 8.9 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 11.5 | 34 | 175 | 59 | 19.8 | 33.6 | |||
| 11.5 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 6.3 | 12.1 | 36 | 432 | 58 | 19.2 | 33.2 | |||
| 10 | 5.0 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 11.7 | 34 | 418 | 60 | 20.6 | 34.1 |
Routine plasma or whole blood parameters were evaluated on day 5. Due to low number of subjects statistical evaluation was not performed and data were expressed as individual measurements. Abbreviations: WBC–white blood cells, RBC–red blood cells, HGB–hemoglobin, HCT–hematocrit, PLT–platelets, MCV–mean (red blood) cell volume, MCH–mean (red blood) cell HGB and MCHC–mean (red blood) cell HGB concentration.
*mean ± 2SD.
**2.5–97.5th percentiles.
‡ manufacturer´s datasheet.
‡‡range, i.e. (minimum—maximum).
For references see the text.