Literature DB >> 29324441

A study of lateral fall-off (penumbra) optimisation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy.

C Winterhalter1, A Lomax, D Oxley, D C Weber, S Safai.   

Abstract

The lateral fall-off is crucial for sparing organs at risk in proton therapy. It is therefore of high importance to minimize the penumbra for pencil beam scanning (PBS). Three optimisation approaches are investigated: edge-collimated uniformly weighted spots (collimation), pencil beam optimisation of uncollimated pencil beams (edge-enhancement) and the optimisation of edge collimated pencil beams (collimated edge-enhancement). To deliver energies below 70 MeV, these strategies are evaluated in combination with the following pre-absorber methods: field specific fixed thickness pre-absorption (fixed), range specific, fixed thickness pre-absorption (automatic) and range specific, variable thickness pre-absorption (variable). All techniques are evaluated by Monte Carlo simulated square fields in a water tank. For a typical air gap of 10 cm, without pre-absorber collimation reduces the penumbra only for water equivalent ranges between 4-11 cm by up to 2.2 mm. The sharpest lateral fall-off is achieved through collimated edge-enhancement, which lowers the penumbra down to 2.8 mm. When using a pre-absorber, the sharpest fall-offs are obtained when combining collimated edge-enhancement with a variable pre-absorber. For edge-enhancement and large air gaps, it is crucial to minimize the amount of material in the beam. For small air gaps however, the superior phase space of higher energetic beams can be employed when more material is used. In conclusion, collimated edge-enhancement combined with the variable pre-absorber is the recommended setting to minimize the lateral penumbra for PBS. Without collimator, it would be favourable to use a variable pre-absorber for large air gaps and an automatic pre-absorber for small air gaps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29324441     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa2ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Trimmer sequencing time minimization during dynamically collimated proton therapy using a colony of cooperating agents.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Daniel E Hyer; Ryan T Flynn; Patrick M Hill; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Proton therapy delivery: what is needed in the next ten years?

Authors:  Andries N Schreuder; Jacob Shamblin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Myths and realities of range uncertainty.

Authors:  Antony John Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Safety and Efficacy of Re-irradiation With Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Shintaro Shiba; Masahiko Okamoto; Kei Shibuya; Shohei Okazaki; Daijiro Kobayashi; Yuhei Miyasaka; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Mechanical Characterization and Validation of the Dynamic Collimation System Prototype for Proton Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Theodore Geoghegan; Kaustubh Patwardhan; Nicholas Nelson; Patrick Hill; Ryan Flynn; Blake Smith; Daniel Hyer
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Design of a focused collimator for proton therapy spot scanning using Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Theodore J Geoghegan; Nicholas P Nelson; Ryan T Flynn; Patrick M Hill; Suresh Rana; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Sheng Huang; Minglei Kang; Kevin Souris; Christopher Ainsley; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough; Charles B Simone; Liyong Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Proton therapy needs further technological development to fulfill the promise of becoming a superior treatment modality (compared to photon therapy).

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Xuanfeng Ding; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Laura C Bennett; Theodore J Geoghegan; Martin Bues; Blake R Smith
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.