Literature DB >> 29322825

Blood Glucose Monitoring Data Should Be Reported in Detail When Studies About Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Published.

Stefan Pleus1, Lutz Heinemann2, Guido Freckmann1.   

Abstract

Recently, two clinical trials about a "sensor-based flash glucose monitoring system" and its efficacy in reducing time in hypoglycemia were published. Interestingly, patients spent more time at low glucose concentrations in these studies than in other studies related to the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM). Although it is possible that the study populations differed from those in other studies, another potential explanation is that the CGM system used in these two studies had a negative glucose measurement bias. Such a negative bias was reported in recent literature, suggesting that the CGM system may inaccurately indicate hypoglycemia. Reporting blood glucose monitoring data would help to interpret the CGM data at least in the context of time spent in various glucose ranges as a parameter with which quality of diabetes therapy is measured.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood glucose monitoring; clinical trial; continuous glucose monitoring; hypoglycemia

Year:  2018        PMID: 29322825      PMCID: PMC6134630          DOI: 10.1177/1932296817753629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

1.  Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Bolinder; Ramiro Antuna; Petronella Geelhoed-Duijvestijn; Jens Kröger; Raimund Weitgasser
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Katrina Ruedy; Andrew Ahmann; Stacie Haller; Davida Kruger; Janet B McGill; William Polonsky; David Price; Stephen Aronoff; Ronnie Aronson; Elena Toschi; Craig Kollman; Richard Bergenstal
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Marcus Lind; William Polonsky; Irl B Hirsch; Tim Heise; Jan Bolinder; Sofia Dahlqvist; Erik Schwarz; Arndís Finna Ólafsdóttir; Anders Frid; Hans Wedel; Elsa Ahlén; Thomas Nyström; Jarl Hellman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Tonya Riddlesworth; Katrina Ruedy; Andrew Ahmann; Richard Bergenstal; Stacie Haller; Craig Kollman; Davida Kruger; Janet B McGill; William Polonsky; Elena Toschi; Howard Wolpert; David Price
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Trang T Ly; Jennifer A Nicholas; Adam Retterath; Ee Mun Lim; Elizabeth A Davis; Timothy W Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes in young children aged 4 to <10 years.

Authors:  Nelly Mauras; Roy Beck; Dongyuan Xing; Katrina Ruedy; Bruce Buckingham; Michael Tansey; Neil H White; Stuart A Weinzimer; William Tamborlane; Craig Kollman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Performance of the FreeStyle Libre Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M J Fokkert; P R van Dijk; M A Edens; S Abbes; D de Jong; R J Slingerland; H J G Bilo
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2017-02-17

8.  Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring for the Management of Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Thomas Haak; Hélène Hanaire; Ramzi Ajjan; Norbert Hermanns; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.945

9.  REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Grazia Aleppo; Katrina J Ruedy; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Davida F Kruger; Anne L Peters; Irl Hirsch; Richard M Bergenstal; Elena Toschi; Andrew J Ahmann; Viral N Shah; Michael R Rickels; Bruce W Bode; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Rodica Pop-Busui; Henry Rodriguez; Emily Eyth; Anuj Bhargava; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Comment on Grino et al: Suitability of Flash Glucose Monitoring for Detection of Hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Alexander Seibold; Robert Brines
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-31

2.  Response to "Blood Glucose Monitoring Data Should Be Reported in Detail When Studies About Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Published".

Authors:  Michel Grino; Quentin Alitta; Charles Oliver
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Glycemic Metrics Derived From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Klavs Würgler Hansen; Bo Martin Bibby
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 4.  Self-measurement of Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Is There Only One Future?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Andreas Stuhr; Adam Brown; Guido Freckmann; Marc D Breton; Steven Russell; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09-10

5.  Differences Between Flash Glucose Monitor and Fingerprick Measurements.

Authors:  Odd Martin Staal; Heidi Marie Umbach Hansen; Sverre Christian Christiansen; Anders Lyngvi Fougner; Sven Magnus Carlsen; Øyvind Stavdahl
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17

6.  Efficacy and safety of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Castellana; Claudia Parisi; Sergio Di Molfetta; Ludovico Di Gioia; Annalisa Natalicchio; Sebastio Perrini; Angelo Cignarelli; Luigi Laviola; Francesco Giorgino
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-06

7.  Comparison of the FreeStyle Libre Pro Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System and Point-of-Care Capillary Glucose Testing in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Alexandra L Migdal; Georgia M Davis; Maria A Urrutia; Bonnie Albury; Cesar Zambrano; Priyathama Vellanki; Francisco J Pasquel; Maya Fayfman; Limin Peng; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Glucose Profiles Assessed by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring System during the Perioperative Period of Metabolic Surgery.

Authors:  Kyuho Kim; Sung Hee Choi; Hak Chul Jang; Young Suk Park; Tae Jung Oh
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.893

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.