Literature DB >> 29322351

From Pacemaker to Wearable: Techniques for ECG Detection Systems.

Ashish Kumar1, Rama Komaragiri1, Manjeet Kumar2.   

Abstract

With the alarming rise in the deaths due to cardiovascular diseases (CVD), present medical research scenario places notable importance on techniques and methods to detect CVDs. As adduced by world health organization, technological proceeds in the field of cardiac function assessment have become the nucleus and heart of all leading research studies in CVDs in which electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is the most functional and convenient tool used to test the range of heart-related irregularities. Most of the approaches present in the literature of ECG signal analysis consider noise removal, rhythm-based analysis, and heartbeat detection to improve the performance of a cardiac pacemaker. Advancements achieved in the field of ECG segments detection and beat classification have a limited evaluation and still require clinical approvals. In this paper, approaches on techniques to implement on-chip ECG detector for a cardiac pacemaker system are discussed. Moreover, different challenges regarding the ECG signal morphology analysis deriving from medical literature is extensively reviewed. It is found that robustness to noise, wavelet parameter choice, numerical efficiency, and detection performance are essential performance indicators required by a state-of-the-art ECG detector. Furthermore, many algorithms described in the existing literature are not verified using ECG data from the standard databases. Some ECG detection algorithms show very high detection performance with the total number of detected QRS complexes. However, the high detection performance of the algorithm is verified using only a few datasets. Finally, gaps in current advancements and testing are identified, and the primary challenge remains to be implementing bullseye test for morphology analysis evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosignal processor (BSP); Body sensor network (BSN); Discrete wavelet transform (DWT); ECG detector; Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29322351     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0886-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  49 in total

1.  A wavelet-based ECG delineator: evaluation on standard databases.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Martínez; Rute Almeida; Salvador Olmos; Ana Paula Rocha; Pablo Laguna
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  A computationally efficient QRS detection algorithm for wearable ECG sensors.

Authors:  Y Wang; C J Deepu; Y Lian
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

3.  Fast technique for noninvasive fetal ECG extraction.

Authors:  Ruben Martín-Clemente; Jose Luis Camargo-Olivares; Susana Hornillo-Mellado; Mar Elena; Isabel Roman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Combining algorithms in automatic detection of QRS complexes in ECG signals.

Authors:  Carsten Meyer; José Fernández Gavela; Matthew Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-07

5.  Fully-integrated heart rate variability monitoring system with an efficient memory.

Authors:  Xiaoyue Wang; Mingqi Chen; L Macchiarulo; O Boric-Lubecke
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006

6.  A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms.

Authors:  G M Friesen; T C Jannett; M A Jadallah; S L Yates; S R Quint; H T Nagle
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Development of an automated updated Selvester QRS scoring system using SWT-based QRS fractionation detection and classification.

Authors:  Valentina Bono; Evangelos B Mazomenos; Taihai Chen; James A Rosengarten; Amit Acharyya; Koushik Maharatna; John M Morgan; Nick Curzen
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.772

8.  Joint Feature Extraction and Classifier Design for ECG-Based Biometric Recognition.

Authors:  Sandeep Gutta; Qi Cheng
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.772

9.  An approach to QRS complex detection using mathematical morphology.

Authors:  P E Trahanias
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  A 0.83- μW QRS detection processor using quadratic spline wavelet transform for wireless ECG acquisition in 0.35- μm CMOS.

Authors:  Chio-In Ieong; Pui-In Mak; Chi-Pang Lam; Cheng Dong; Mang-I Vai; Peng-Un Mak; Sio-Hang Pun; Feng Wan; Rui P Martins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.833

View more
  6 in total

1.  Design of a Biorthogonal Wavelet Transform Based R-Peak Detection and Data Compression Scheme for Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker Systems.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Manjeet Kumar; Rama Komaragiri
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Advances in Soft and Dry Electrodes for Wearable Health Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Hyeonseok Kim; Eugene Kim; Chanyeong Choi; Woon-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.523

3.  Area efficient folded undecimator based ECG detector.

Authors:  A Uma; P Kalpana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Golden Standard or Obsolete Method? Review of ECG Applications in Clinical and Experimental Context.

Authors:  Tibor Stracina; Marina Ronzhina; Richard Redina; Marie Novakova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Reliable P wave detection in pathological ECG signals.

Authors:  Lucie Saclova; Andrea Nemcova; Radovan Smisek; Lukas Smital; Martin Vitek; Marina Ronzhina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A universal, high-performance ECG signal processing engine to reduce clinical burden.

Authors:  Austin Gibbs; Matthew Fitzpatrick; Mark Lilburn; Holly Easlea; Jonathan Francey; Rebecca Funston; Jordan Diven; Stacey Murray; Oliver G J Mitchell; Adrian Condon; Andrew R J Mitchell; Benjamin Sanchez; David Steinhaus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.485

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.