Literature DB >> 29322292

Bilateral symmetrical comparison of the proximal femur using 3D-CT models.

Filip C Dolatowski1,2, Max J Temmesfeld1,2, Claude Pierre-Jerome3, Arne Borthne1,3, Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Superimposed three-dimensional (3D)-models obtained from CT-images have been used to evaluate displacement of femoral neck fractures, but this method assumes symmetrical anatomy of normal femurs. The present study aimed to compare the spatial orientation of the left and right proximal femur, thus establishing if 3D models can be used as a reference standard for the evaluation of fracture displacement.
METHODS: We generated 3D-CT-models of 20 patients with no skeletal pathology of the proximal femurs. Three observers independently determined the positions of the fovea and the femoral head, and a vector intersecting the centre points of the fovea and the femoral head defined the rotation. Differences in positions and rotations were determined by superimposing the 3D-CT-models of both femurs.
RESULTS: The mean distance (95% CI) between positions of the left and right fovea was 3.1 mm (2.7-3.4) and between the left and right femoral head 2.8 mm (2.6-3.0). The minimal detectable change was 2.8 for the fovea and 2.3 for the femoral head, and the repeatability coefficients between 2.1-2.7 and 1.0-2.9, respectively. Mean difference in rotation of the femoral head was 6° (5.3-6.6) with a minimal detectable change of 8.8 and repeatability coefficients ranging from 5.8 to 10.0.
CONCLUSIONS: Distances between the left and right femoral heads were larger than what could be explained by measurement error alone, suggesting that there may be minor side-to-side differences. However, these differences are small, and 3D-CT-models can be used as a reference standard to evaluate displacement of femoral neck fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Femoral neck fracture; Proximal femur; Spatial orientation; Three-dimensional models

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29322292     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-018-1968-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  11 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Lateral X-ray for proximal femoral fractures - Is it really necessary?

Authors:  Osman Riaz; Sohail Nisar; Rizwan Arshad; Raees Vanker
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 3.  Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults.

Authors:  M J Parker; K Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

4.  Reunderstanding of garden type I femoral neck fractures by 3-dimensional reconstruction.

Authors:  Chang-Ling Du; Xin-Long Ma; Tao Zhang; Hua-Feng Zhang; Chen-Guang Wang; Feng Zhao; Jian-Xiong Ma; Xin Fu; Zhi-Jun Li
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  The influence of the hips position on measurements of posterior tilt in a valgus-impacted femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken; Filip C Dolatowski
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Internal fixation of garden I and II femoral neck fractures: posterior tilt did not influence the reoperation rate in 382 consecutive hips followed for a minimum of 5 years.

Authors:  Lasse J Lapidus; Anastasios Charalampidis; Johanna Rundgren; Anders Enocson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Lateral Radiograph of the Hip in Fracture Neck of Femur: Is it a Ritual?

Authors:  Dheerendra S Kumar; Shivarathre D Gubbi; Bari Abdul; Muddu Bisalahalli
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Frede Frihagen; Lars Nordsletten; Jan Erik Madsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-04

9.  A new measurement for posterior tilt predicts reoperation in undisplaced femoral neck fractures: 113 consecutive patients treated by internal fixation and followed for 1 year.

Authors:  Henrik Palm; Kasper Gosvig; Michael Krasheninnikoff; Steffen Jacobsen; Peter Gebuhr
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20° increased the risk of fixation failure in Garden-I and -II femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Filip C Dolatowski; Mina Adampour; Frede Frihagen; Knut Stavem; Stein Erik Utvåg; Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs Accurately Predict Displacement in Valgus-Impacted Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Max J Temmesfeld; Filip C Dolatowski; Arne Borthne; Stein Erik Utvåg; Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-02-27

2.  Risk modeling of femoral neck fracture based on geometric parameters of the proximal epiphysis.

Authors:  Anna D Shitova; Olga N Kovaleva; Anna V Olsufieva; Inchekhanum A Gadzhimuradova; Dmitry D Zubkov; Mikhail O Kniazev; Tatyana S Zharikova; Yury O Zharikov
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.