Literature DB >> 23746022

Reunderstanding of garden type I femoral neck fractures by 3-dimensional reconstruction.

Chang-Ling Du1, Xin-Long Ma, Tao Zhang, Hua-Feng Zhang, Chen-Guang Wang, Feng Zhao, Jian-Xiong Ma, Xin Fu, Zhi-Jun Li.   

Abstract

Garden type I fractures include incomplete fractures and impacted fractures. With advances in scientific technology and medical treatment, certain deficiencies of the Garden classification have become apparent. The authors hypothesized that the incidence of incomplete femoral neck fractures was low and that impacted femoral neck fractures were not undisplaced and stable fractures. A new method was developed to precisely measure the spatial displacement of the femoral head in impacted femoral neck fractures. Between 2008 and 2011, nine hundred sixty-six patients with femoral neck fractures were treated, 48 of whom had Garden type I fractures, as seen on anteroposterior radiographs. Seven fractures were classified as incomplete on radiographs; however, after 3-dimensional reconstruction, 3 were classified as incomplete and 4 as complete fractures. Furthermore, the remaining 41 Garden I fractures that were classified as impacted on radiographs showed large spatial displacement on 3-dimensional reconstruction. The average rotational displacement of the femoral head was 19.29°±10.51°, and the average displacements of the femoral head center and the lowest point of the fovea capitis were 8.76±4.45 and 14.39±8.08 mm, respectively. This study showed that the incidence of incomplete femoral neck fractures was low. Impacted femoral neck fractures showed variable degrees of displacement and were not undisplaced, stable fractures. Garden classification for impacted femoral neck fractures has certain limitations. Impacted femoral neck fractures should be differentiated from Garden type I fractures so clinicians can select appropriate treatments for these fractures. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746022     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130523-31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Bilateral symmetrical comparison of the proximal femur using 3D-CT models.

Authors:  Filip C Dolatowski; Max J Temmesfeld; Claude Pierre-Jerome; Arne Borthne; Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Classifications in Brief: Garden Classification of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Jillian M Kazley; Samik Banerjee; Mostafa M Abousayed; Andrew J Rosenbaum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A special superior cortex compressive fracture of femoral neck: Two case reports.

Authors:  Hang Xian; Hang Zhang; Kejian Lian; Dasheng Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Challenging the dogma to "always operate" acute hip fractures: a proof-of-concept pilot study for nonoperative management of undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Vinas-Rios; Jan-Henning Wölm; Richard Martin Sellei; Andreas Ladenburger
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Modeling of the Spatial Displacement, Extent and Rotational Orientation of Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Xin Fu; Gui-Jun Xu; Zhi-Jun Li; Chang-Ling Du; Zhe Han; Tao Zhang; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Correlation Between Residual Displacement and Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Cannulated Screw Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Gui-Jun Xu; Zhe Han; Xuan Jiang; Cheng-Bao Zhang; Qiang Dong; Jian-Xiong Ma; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.