Louise Thomsen Schmidt Arenholt1,2, Marianne Glavind-Kristensen3, Henrik Bøggild4,5, Karin Glavind6. 1. Center for Clinical Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Bispensgade 37, 9800, Hjørring, Denmark. ltsa@rn.dk. 2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark. ltsa@rn.dk. 3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 5. Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 6. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In the clinical evaluation of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), it is important to evaluate both objective and subjective presentations. The objective evaluation is done by gynecological examination, but the subjective presentation is more complex. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) is an important tool for subjective evaluation, and a Danish version was developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English version was translated into Danish in accordance with guidelines. Eight women underwent a semistructured interview showing no misunderstandings. Women with and without prolapse completed the questionnaire and underwent a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination. Three weeks later a retest was done. Women undergoing prolapse surgery completed the questionnaire 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety-four women with and 98 without prolapse were included; 52 underwent surgery. Retest response rate was 88-95%. Mean time between test and retest was 24.5 and 92.2 days, respectively. Missing data ranged between 0 and 1%. Test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.61-0.88) and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha 0.79-0.84). The questionnaire was excellent when distinguishing between women with and without prolapse (p < 0.001). Criterion validity (correlation between POP-Q stage and the questionnaire) was perfect (p < 0.001). Sensitivity to change was excellent for vaginal symptom score and quality of life (p < 0.001) but not for sexual matters (p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: The Danish version of ICIQ-VS was successfully translated and can be a valuable tool for prolapse research and daily evaluation of patients.
INTRODUCTION: In the clinical evaluation of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), it is important to evaluate both objective and subjective presentations. The objective evaluation is done by gynecological examination, but the subjective presentation is more complex. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) is an important tool for subjective evaluation, and a Danish version was developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English version was translated into Danish in accordance with guidelines. Eight women underwent a semistructured interview showing no misunderstandings. Women with and without prolapse completed the questionnaire and underwent a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination. Three weeks later a retest was done. Women undergoing prolapse surgery completed the questionnaire 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety-four women with and 98 without prolapse were included; 52 underwent surgery. Retest response rate was 88-95%. Mean time between test and retest was 24.5 and 92.2 days, respectively. Missing data ranged between 0 and 1%. Test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.61-0.88) and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha 0.79-0.84). The questionnaire was excellent when distinguishing between women with and without prolapse (p < 0.001). Criterion validity (correlation between POP-Q stage and the questionnaire) was perfect (p < 0.001). Sensitivity to change was excellent for vaginal symptom score and quality of life (p < 0.001) but not for sexual matters (p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: The Danish version of ICIQ-VS was successfully translated and can be a valuable tool for prolapse research and daily evaluation of patients.
Authors: Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lea Tami Suzuki Zuchelo; Italla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra; Adna Thaysa Marcial Da Silva; Jéssica Menezes Gomes; José Maria Soares Júnior; Edmund Chada Baracat; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2018-08-08