| Literature DB >> 29321886 |
Per Holm Nygaard1, Line Tau Strand2, Arne Oddvar Stuanes2.
Abstract
Stand dynamics and the gap initiation prior to gap formation are not well-understood because of its long-term nature and the scarcity of late-successional stands. Reconstruction of such disturbance is normally based on historical records and dendroecological methods. We investigated gap initiation and formation at the fine-scale stand level in the old-growth reserve of Karlshaugen in Norway. Given its long-term conservation history, and thorough mapping in permanent marked plots with spatially referenced trees, it provides an opportunity to present stand development before, during, and after gap formation. Late-successional decline in biomass was recorded after more than 50 years of close to steady state. Gaps in the canopy were mainly created by large old trees that had been killed by spruce bark beetles. Snapping by wind was the main reason for treefall. Long-term dominance ofEntities:
Keywords: biomass decline; gap initiation; late‐successional dynamics; long‐term permanent plots; nutrients
Year: 2017 PMID: 29321886 PMCID: PMC5756830 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1The location of the nature reserve in Norway. The old map from 1930 showing the grid plots (green dots), the stand polygon (green), the gap polygon (red), the fire polygon (purple), and demarking line for selection cutting (brown) and ditching (blue)
Figure 7Frequency distribution of height of the gap‐maker trees recorded within the 1,161 m2 gap area
Figure 5The “Donald” shaped gap area with nine living trees still standing inside the gap area and 10 dead standing trees (green) at the gap margin
Figure 2Part of the gap area photographed before and after gap formation. The double top tree in the middle (red) of the photograph is the same tree. The tree close to the right‐hand edge of the picture is snapped, but the dry twig on the stem and on the snag can be seen on all photos. Note the dominance of Vaccinium myrtillus at all point of time
The volume and number of living and dead spruce, pine, and birch trees (DBH > 2 cm) based on the grid plots from the stand for each registration. In addition, aboveground biomass for spruce and downed coarse woody debris for 2013 is presented. Standard deviations are in parentheses
| 1930 | 1978 | 1997 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norway spruce | ||||
| Volume of living trees (m3/ha) | 287 (139) | 294 (199) | 207 (153) | 205 (94) |
| Number of living trees (per ha) | 1,200 (219) | 933 (432) | 700 (374) | 733 (301) |
| Volume of dead trees (m3/ha) | 5 (7) | 28 (65) | 96 (141) | 99 (126) |
| Number of dead trees (per ha) | 200 (178) | 267 (301) | 367 (344) | 433 (344) |
| Scots pine | ||||
| Volume of living trees (m3/ha) | 10 (23) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of living trees (per ha) | 33 (81) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Volume of dead trees (m3/ha) | 4 (8) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of dead trees (per ha) | 67 (103) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Birch | ||||
| Volume of living trees (m3/ha) | 66 (103) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of living trees (per ha) | 33 (82) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Volume of dead trees (m3/ha) | 1 (2) | 3 (7) | 0 | 0 |
| Number of dead trees (per ha) | 33 (82) | 33 (82) | 0 | 0 |
| Aboveground biomass trees (t/ha) | 179 | 178 | 123 | 122 |
| Downed coarse woody debris (m3/ha) | — | — | — | 106 (133) |
—, Not analyzed.
Figure 3Diameter class (cm) distributions for all living Norway spruce stems in the stand at the four separate inventories
Figure 4Boxplots of DBH of dead and live trees on the grid plots in the stand at each point of time. The box encloses the middle 50% of observations. Median is represented as a vertical line inside the box and +display the mean. The upper whisker is drawn from upper quartile to the largest observation, while the lower whisker is drawn from the lower quartile to the smallest observation
Figure 6Frequency distribution of stem diameter (DBH) of the gap‐maker trees recorded within the 1,161 m2 gap area
Figure 8DBH and age at breast height for dominating Scots pine and dominating Norway spruce within the reserve. Triangles show DBH and age at breast height for codominant Norway spruce within the stand
Figure 9Tree‐ring widths of trees close to the gap edge (red) increased in 1996 compared to those from trees at a distance more than 20 m away from the gap edge (blue)
Figure 10Height versus total age of suppressed advanced growth of Norway spruce collected from the fire polygon, green lines showing 95% confidence limits
Soil properties surrounding each lysimeter site divided according to nongap area and gap area
|
| Tot‐C (g/100 g) | Tot‐N (g/100 g) | NO3–N (μg/kg) | NH4–N (mg/kg) | CN ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| ||
| Nongap | 8 | 49.54 | 2.03 | 1.73 | 0.27 | 180.9 | 63.56 | 5.32 | 4.40 | 29 | 5 |
| Gap | 8 | 50.96 | 1.13 | 1.86 | 0.26 | 215.1 | 47.23 | 5.55 | 3.04 | 28 | 4 |
Significant differences (α 0.05).
Comparisons between soil water extracted from nongap area and gap area, average of seven sampling occasions distributed throughout the growing season
|
| DOC (mg/L) | DON (mg/L) | NO3–N (mg/L) | NH4–N (mg/L) | DOCN ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| ||
| Nongap | 8 | 42.13 | 31.75 | 0.56 | 0.23 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 0.056 | 0.062 | 60 | 10 |
| Gap | 8 | 48.57 | 16.62 | 0.69 | 0.22 | 0.012 | 0.003 | 0.149 | 0.220 | 73 | 13 |
After mean values indicate significant differences (α 0.05).
Properties of soil water samples extracted by macro–rhizon–lysimeters from the upper 10 cm of the soil in different distances from two decomposing stems in the gap area, at six different occasions during the growing season
| Distance from stem |
| DOC (mg/L) | DON (mg/L) | NO3–N (mg/L) | NH4–N (mg/L) | DOCN ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| ||
| Directly under | 2 | 92.6 | 61.4 | 0.67 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 75 | ||
| 10 cm to each side | 4 | 48.7 | 16.8 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 22 | 77 |
| 90 cm to each side | 4 | 53.5 | 22.8 | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 70 | 12 |
Comparisons between PRS‐probes in nongap area and gap area, PRS(tm)‐probe supply rate given as μg/10 cm2 over 110 days
| Forest |
| μg/10 cm2 over 110 days | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO3–N | NH4–N | Ca | Mg | K | |||||||
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| ||
| Nongap | 8 | 6.8 | 2.7 | 9.1 | 2.3 | 349.7 | 70.7 | 183.5 | 60.1 | 692.5a | 264.2 |
| Gap | 14 | 10.6 | 7.7 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 770.3 | 330.4 | 267.1 | 94.1 | 124.2b | 90.5 |
After mean values indicate significant differences (α 0.05).