Literature DB >> 29321270

Phenotypes can be robust and evolvable if mutations have non-local effects on sequence constraints.

Marcel Weiß1,2, Sebastian E Ahnert3,2.   

Abstract

The mapping between biological genotypes and phenotypes plays an important role in evolution, and understanding the properties of this mapping is crucial to determine the outcome of evolutionary processes. One of the most striking properties observed in several genotype-phenotype (GP) maps is the positive correlation between the robustness and evolvability of phenotypes. This implies that a phenotype can be strongly robust against mutations and at the same time evolvable to a diverse range of alternative phenotypes. Here, we examine the causes for this positive correlation by introducing two analytically tractable GP map models that follow the principles of real biological GP maps. The first model is based on gene-like GP maps, reflecting the way in which genetic sequences are organized into protein-coding genes, and the second one is based on the GP map of RNA secondary structure. For both models, we find that a positive correlation between phenotype robustness and evolvability only emerges if mutations at one sequence position can have non-local effects on the sequence constraints at another position. This highlights that non-local effects of mutations are closely related to the coexistence of robustness and evolvability in phenotypes, and are likely to be an important feature of many biological GP maps.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  evolution; evolvability; genotype–phenotype map; robustness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29321270      PMCID: PMC5805963          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  20 in total

1.  Self-assembly, modularity, and physical complexity.

Authors:  S E Ahnert; I G Johnston; T M A Fink; J P K Doye; A A Louis
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-08-27

2.  The structure of the genotype-phenotype map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA.

Authors:  Kamaludin Dingle; Steffen Schaper; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  P Schuster; W Fontana; P F Stadler; I L Hofacker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolutionary dynamics in a simple model of self-assembly.

Authors:  Iain G Johnston; Sebastian E Ahnert; Jonathan P K Doye; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-06-13

5.  Distribution of genotype network sizes in sequence-to-structure genotype-phenotype maps.

Authors:  Susanna Manrubia; José A Cuesta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Statistical geometry in sequence space: a method of quantitative comparative sequence analysis.

Authors:  M Eigen; R Winkler-Oswatitsch; A Dress
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Natural selection and the concept of a protein space.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Topological structure of the space of phenotypes: the case of RNA neutral networks.

Authors:  Jacobo Aguirre; Javier M Buldú; Michael Stich; Susanna C Manrubia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima.

Authors:  Steffen Schaper; Ard A Louis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolutionary plasticity and innovations in complex metabolic reaction networks.

Authors:  João F Matias Rodrigues; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

1.  Using small samples to estimate neutral component size and robustness in the genotype-phenotype map of RNA secondary structure.

Authors:  Marcel Weiß; Sebastian E Ahnert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The structure of genotype-phenotype maps makes fitness landscapes navigable.

Authors:  Sam F Greenbury; Ard A Louis; Sebastian E Ahnert
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 19.100

3.  Model genotype-phenotype mappings and the algorithmic structure of evolution.

Authors:  Daniel Nichol; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Alexander R A Anderson; Peter Jeavons
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Phenotype Bias Determines How Natural RNA Structures Occupy the Morphospace of All Possible Shapes.

Authors:  Kamaludin Dingle; Fatme Ghaddar; Petr Šulc; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  On the evolution and development of morphological complexity: A view from gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Pascal F Hagolani; Roland Zimm; Renske Vroomans; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.