Literature DB >> 29320888

Comparative studies with EPR and MRI on the in vivo tissue redox status estimation using redox-sensitive nitroxyl probes: influence of the choice of the region of interest.

Ken-Ichiro Matsumoto1, James B Mitchell2, Murali C Krishna2.   

Abstract

In vivo decay rates of a nitroxyl contrast agent were estimated by a MR redox imaging (MRRI) technique and compared with the decay rates obtained by the electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPRS) and imaging (EPRI). MRRI is a dynamic imaging technique employing T1-weighted pulse sequence, which can visualise a nitroxyl-induced enhancement of signal intensity by T1-weighted contrast. EPR techniques can directly measure the paramagnetic nitroxyl radical. Both the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumour-bearing and normal legs of a female C3H mouse were scanned by T1-weighted SPGR sequence at 4.7 T with the nitroxyl radical, carbamoyl-proxyl (CmP), as the contrast agent. Similarly, the time course of CmP in normal muscle and tumour tissues was obtained using a 700-MHz EPR spectrometer with a surface coil. The time course imaging of CmP was also performed by 300 MHz CW EPR imager. EPRS and EPRI gave slower decay rates of CmP compared to the MRRI. Relatively slow decay rate at peripheral region of the tumour tissues, which was found in the image obtained by MRRI, may contribute to the slower decay rates observed by EPRS and/or the EPRI measurements. To reliably determine the tissue redox status from the reduction rates of nitroxyls such as CmP, heterogenic structure in the tumour tissue must be considered. The high spatial and temporal resolution of T1-weighted MRI and the T1-enhancing capabilities of nitroxyls support the use of this method to map tissue redox status which can be a useful biomarker to guide appropriate treatments based on the tumour microenvironment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electron paramagnetic resonance; magnetic resonance functional imaging; nitroxide radical; redox mapping; redox sensitive contrast agent; tumour physiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29320888      PMCID: PMC6333207          DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2018.1427235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Res        ISSN: 1029-2470


  7 in total

1.  Effects of oxygen challenging to tissue redox and pO2 status.

Authors:  Ken-Ichiro Matsumoto; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Development of a fast-scan EPR imaging system for highly accelerated free radical imaging.

Authors:  Alexandre Samouilov; Rizwan Ahmad; James Boslett; Xiaoping Liu; Sergey Petryakov; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Development of an L-band resonator optimized for fast scan EPR imaging of the mouse head.

Authors:  Alexandre Samouilov; Denis Komarov; Sergey Petryakov; Arkadiy Iosilevich; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Enhancing the Efficacy of Metal-Free MRI Contrast Agents via Conjugating Nitroxides onto PEGylated Cross-Linked Poly(Carboxylate Ester).

Authors:  Shiwei Guo; Xiaoming Wang; Yan Dai; Xinghang Dai; Zhiqian Li; Qiang Luo; Xiuli Zheng; Zhongwei Gu; Hu Zhang; Qiyong Gong; Kui Luo
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 5.  EPR Everywhere.

Authors:  Joshua R Biller; Joseph E McPeak
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 0.831

6.  In vivo visualization of redox status by high-resolution whole body magnetic resonance imaging using nitroxide radicals.

Authors:  Tetsuro Uchida; Hitoshi Togashi; Yoshinori Kuroda; Kazuyuki Haga; Mitsuaki Sadahiro; Takamasa Kayama
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.114

7.  Redox-Sensitive Mapping of a Mouse Tumor Model Using Sparse Projection Sampling of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Kota Kimura; Nami Iguchi; Hitomi Nakano; Hironobu Yasui; Shingo Matsumoto; Osamu Inanami; Hiroshi Hirata
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 8.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.