| Literature DB >> 29320426 |
Yamei Liu1,2, Caili Hou3, Tifeng Jiao4,5, Jingwen Song6,7, Xu Zhang8, Ruirui Xing9,10, Jingxin Zhou11, Lexin Zhang12, Qiuming Peng13.
Abstract
The design and self-assembly of graphene oxide (GO)-based composite membranes have attracted enormous attention due to their wide application in nanomaterial and environmental fields. In this work, we have successfully developed a strategy to fabricate new composite membranes based on poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(acrylic acid)/carboxyl-functionalized graphene oxide modified with silver nanoparticles (PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs), which were prepared via thermal treatment and the electrospinning technique. Due to the strong π-π forces and strong electrostatic interactions of GO-COOH sheets, the prepared composite membranes and their lager surface areas were modified by scores of AgNPs, which demonstrated that a high-efficiency photocatalyst removed the organic dyes from the aqueous solutions. The prepared PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite membranes showed a remarkable photocatalytic capacity in the catalytic degradation of the methylene blue dye solutions. Most importantly, the whole process was easy, mild, and eco-friendly. Additionally, the as-prepared membranes could be repeatedly used after the catalytic reaction.Entities:
Keywords: composite membranes; dyes degradation; electrospinning; graphene oxide; photocatalyst; wastewater treatment
Year: 2018 PMID: 29320426 PMCID: PMC5791122 DOI: 10.3390/nano8010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the fabrication of PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposites by electrospinning and thermal treatment.
Figure 2SEM images of the prepared PVA/PAA/GO-COOH nanocomposite by electrospinning and thermal treatment (a); and next modified with Ag nanoparticles at 1 h (b,c); Picture (d) indicates the EDXS taken on the Ag nanoparticles shown in (c). The Al and Au peaks originate from the aluminum foil substrate and coated Au particles.
Figure 3TEM images of the prepared PVA/PAA/GO-COOH nanocomposite (a); the obtained Ag nanoparticles at 5 min (b) and 1 h (c); and PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite at a modified time of 1 h (d).
Figure 4X-ray diffraction patterns (a) and TG curves (b) of the prepared GO-COOH solid, PVA/PAA/GO-COOH nanocomposite, and PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite at modified time of 1 h.
Figure 5Raman spectroscopy (a) and D/G ratios (b) of different samples.
Figure 6Survey XPS spectra of both samples (A): a, PVA/PAA/GO-COOH nanocomposite; b, PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite at modified time of 1 h; (B) Ag3d deconvolution of XPS peaks in spectra b.
Figure 7Photocatalytic kinetics curves of as-prepared PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite on MB (a,b) and RhB (c,d) at 298 K.
Kinetic parameters of PVA/PAA/GO-COOH nanocomposite and PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite for RhB and MB degradations and removal at 298 K (experimental data from Figure 7).
| PVA/PAA/GO-COOH | 2.64 | 0.9981 | 0.0442 | 3.43 | 0.9976 | 0.0125 |
| PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs | 2.71 | 0.9972 | 0.1445 | 2.90 | 0.9996 | 0.1072 |
| PVA/PAA/GO-COOH | 27.19 | 0.9989 | 0.01405 | 36.97 | 0.9932 | 2.07 × 10−4 |
| PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs | 26.01 | 0.9945 | 0.07784 | 26.36 | 0.9988 | 1.20 × 10−2 |
Figure 8Relative photocatalytic capacity and regeneration studies of as-prepared PVA/PAA/GO-COOH@AgNPs nanocomposite towards MB at room temperature for different consecutive cycles.