Literature DB >> 19347841

Role of electrospun fibre diameter and corresponding specific surface area (SSA) on cell attachment.

Ming Chen1, Prabir K Patra, Michael L Lovett, David L Kaplan, Sankha Bhowmick.   

Abstract

In order to develop scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications, it is important to develop an understanding of the kinetics of cell attachment as a function of scaffold geometry. In the present study, we investigated how the specific surface area of electrospun scaffolds affected cell attachment and spreading. Number of cells attached to the scaffold was measured by the relative intensity of a metabolic dye (MTS) and cell spreading was analysed for individual cells by measuring the area of projected F-actin cytoskeleton. We varied the fibre diameter to obtain a specific surface area distribution in the range 2.24-18.79 microm(-1). In addition, we had one case where the scaffolds had beads in them and therefore had non-uniform fibres. For each of these different geometries, we varied the cell-seeding density (0.5-1 x 10(5)) and the serum concentration (0-12%) over the first 8 h in an electrospun polycaprolactone NIH 3T3 fibroblast system. Cells on beaded scaffolds showed the lowest attachment and almost no F-actin spreading in all experiments indicating uniform fibre diameter is essential for electrospun scaffolds. For the uniform fibre scaffolds, cell attachment was a function of scaffold specific surface area (SSA) (18.79-2.24 microm(-1)) and followed two distinct trends: when scaffold SSA was < 7.13 microm(-1), cell adhesion rate remained largely unchanged; however, for SSA > 7.13 microm(-1) there was a significant increase in cellular attachment rate with increasing SSA. This indicated that nanofibrous scaffolds increased cellular adhesion compared to microfibrous scaffolds. This phenomenon is true for serum concentrations of 7.5% and higher. For 5% and lower serum concentration, cell attachment is low and higher SSA fails to make a significant improvement in cell attachment. When cell attachment was investigated at a single-cell level by measuring the projected actin area, a similar trend was noted where the effect of higher SSA led to higher projected area for cells at 8 h. These results indicate that uniform electrospun scaffolds with SSA provide a faster cell attachment compared to lower SSA and beaded scaffolds. These results indicate that continuous electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds may be a good substrate for rapid tissue regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19347841     DOI: 10.1002/term.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  11 in total

1.  Modeling tissue growth within nonwoven scaffolds pores.

Authors:  Sharon L Edwards; Jeffrey S Church; David L J Alexander; Stephen J Russell; Eileen Ingham; John A M Ramshaw; Jerome A Werkmeister
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  A method to integrate patterned electrospun fibers with microfluidic systems to generate complex microenvironments for cell culture applications.

Authors:  Patric Wallin; Carl Zandén; Björn Carlberg; Nina Hellström Erkenstam; Johan Liu; Julie Gold
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Fibrous hyaluronic acid hydrogels that direct MSC chondrogenesis through mechanical and adhesive cues.

Authors:  Iris L Kim; Sudhir Khetan; Brendon M Baker; Christopher S Chen; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Effective Modulation of CNS Inhibitory Microenvironment using Bioinspired Hybrid-Nanoscaffold-Based Therapeutic Interventions.

Authors:  Letao Yang; Brian M Conley; Susana R Cerqueira; Thanapat Pongkulapa; Shenqiang Wang; Jae K Lee; Ki-Bum Lee
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Self-Assembled AgNP-Containing Nanocomposites Constructed by Electrospinning as Efficient Dye Photocatalyst Materials for Wastewater Treatment.

Authors:  Yamei Liu; Caili Hou; Tifeng Jiao; Jingwen Song; Xu Zhang; Ruirui Xing; Jingxin Zhou; Lexin Zhang; Qiuming Peng
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Chemical Composition and Porosity Characteristics of Various Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Cements.

Authors:  Seok Woo Chang
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.778

7.  Dual-layer aligned-random nanofibrous scaffolds for improving gradient microstructure of tendon-to-bone healing in a rabbit extra-articular model.

Authors:  Jiangyu Cai; Juan Wang; Kaiqiang Ye; Dandan Li; Chengchong Ai; Dandan Sheng; Wenhe Jin; Xingwang Liu; Yunlong Zhi; Jia Jiang; Jun Chen; Xiumei Mo; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-06-18

8.  Hierarchical AuNPs-Loaded Fe₃O₄/Polymers Nanocomposites Constructed by Electrospinning with Enhanced and Magnetically Recyclable Catalytic Capacities.

Authors:  Rong Guo; Tifeng Jiao; Ruirui Xing; Yan Chen; Wanchun Guo; Jingxin Zhou; Lexin Zhang; Qiuming Peng
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 9.  In vivo Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Calcium Silicate-Based Bioceramics in Endodontics.

Authors:  Wencheng Song; Wei Sun; Lili Chen; Zhenglin Yuan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  Oxygen Plasma Treated-Electrospun Polyhydroxyalkanoate Scaffolds for Hydrophilicity Improvement and Cell Adhesion.

Authors:  Asiyah Esmail; João R Pereira; Patrícia Zoio; Sara Silvestre; Ugur Deneb Menda; Chantal Sevrin; Christian Grandfils; Elvira Fortunato; Maria A M Reis; Célia Henriques; Abel Oliva; Filomena Freitas
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.