| Literature DB >> 29320417 |
Mohammad T Azim1, Mazharul M Islam2.
Abstract
The present study investigates the effect of perceived social support (PSS) and perceived religious endorsement (PRE) on career commitment (CC) of Saudi nurses. The investigation also extends to the moderating role of different demographic and organizational factors in the extent of PSS, and career commitment these nurses report. Data required for meeting these study objectives were collected from male and female Saudi nurses through a structured questionnaire. Multiple regressions using Partial Least Squares based Structural Equation Model, Smart-PLS version 3.0, and independent sample t-test using SPSS version 22.0, were used to analyze data. The study findings reveal that both perceived social support and perceived religious endorsement are important antecedents of career commitment of Saudi nurses. However, private-sector nurses are found to exhibit a significantly higher level of career commitment compared to their public-sector counterparts. Nurses with greater educational attainment perceive higher level of social support and express greater career commitment than their less educated peers. These findings suggest that nursing as a profession should be more openly discussed in both secular and religious contexts, to ensure an adequate level of respect and compassion on behalf of the public. In particular, endorsement from the individual nurses' social networks is vital in maintaining their wellbeing and career commitment. Given the religious influence in all aspects of life in the Saudi society, the current practice of gender-based segregation in Saudi hospitals and clinics seems to be meaningful for sustaining the career commitment of the nurses.Entities:
Keywords: Saudi Arabia; career commitment; nurse; religious endorsement; social support
Year: 2018 PMID: 29320417 PMCID: PMC5791026 DOI: 10.3390/bs8010008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-328X
Sample descriptive.
| Gender | Age | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Below 30 years | Above 30 years | |
| 57 (39%) | 89 (61%) | 112 (77%) | 34 (23%) | |
| Experience | Marital Status | |||
| Below 5 Years | Above 5 Years | Single | Married | |
| 62 (42%) | 84 (58%) | 83 (57%) | 63 (43%) | |
| Education | Organization Type | |||
| Certificate | Diploma | BSc. | Public | Private |
| 17 (12%) | 79 (54%) | 50 (34%) | 119 (81%) | 27 (19%) |
| Scale Variables | Mean | Standard Deviation | ||
| Perceived Social Support (Significant Others) (PSSSO) | 4.07 | 0.65 | ||
| Perceived Social Support (Family) (PSSF) | 4.06 | 0.61 | ||
| Perceived Social Support (Friend) (PSSFR) | 3.92 | 0.59 | ||
| Overall Perceived Social Support (PSS) | 4.02 | 0.53 | ||
| Perceived Religious Endorsement (PRE) | 4.57 | 0.53 | ||
| Career Commitment (CC) | 3.98 | 0.75 | ||
Figure 1Factor loading of the model.
Measurement model indicators.
| Constructs | Cronbach’s Alpha | rho_A | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Social Support-Family (PSSF) | 0.740 | 0.768 | 0.841 | 0.575 | |
| Perceived Social Support-Friends (PSSFR) | 0.774 | 0.808 | 0.854 | 0.597 | |
| Perceived Social Support-Significant Others (PSSSO) | 0.828 | 0.836 | 0.886 | 0.662 | |
| Perceived Social Support (PSS) | 0.879 | 0.887 | 0.902 | 0.504 | |
| Perceived Religious Endorsement (PRE) | 0.794 | 0.804 | 0.880 | 0.710 | |
| Career Commitment (CC) | 0.908 | 0.915 | 0.927 | 0.646 | |
| Discriminant Validly (Fornell-Larcker Criterion) | |||||
| CC | PSSF | PRE | PSSFR | PSSSO | |
| CC | 0.804 | ||||
| PSSF | 0.470 | 0.759 | |||
| PRE | 0.326 | 0.347 | 0.843 | ||
| PSSFR | 0.380 | 0.552 | 0.304 | 0.773 | |
| PSSSO | 0.408 | 0.651 | 0.309 | 0.612 | 0.814 |
Collinearity, R2 and Q2.
| Factors | Collinearity (VIF) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | R2 | Q2 | |
| CC | 0.289 | 0168 | |
| PSS | 1.166 | ||
| PRE | 1.166 | ||
Figure 2Structural model with path coefficients and p-value. (** Indicates significant at 5% level).
Independent sample t-test for mean scores of respondents on perceived social support (PSS) and career commitment (CC).
| Scale | Gender | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (N = 57) | Female (N = 89) | F | T (sig.) | Conclusion | |
| PSS | 4.04 | 3.99 | 0.40 | 0.57 | No significant difference. |
| CC | 3.92 | 4.03 | 1.17 | 0.37 | No significant difference. |
| Organization Type | |||||
| Govt. (N = 119) | Private (N = 27) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 4.02 | 3.99 | 0.40 | 0.82 | No significant difference |
| CC | 3.91 | 4.33 | 2.53 | 0.01 | Significant difference at 0.01 level |
| Age | |||||
| Below 30 (N = 112) | Above 30 (N = 34) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 4.00 | 4.02 | 0.06 | 0.90 | No significant difference. |
| CC | 4.04 | 3.81 | 1.43 | 0.12 | No significant difference. |
| Experience | |||||
| Less than 5 Years (N = 62) | More than 5 Years (N = 84) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 4.02 | 4.01 | 0.23 | 0.92 | No significant difference. |
| CC | 4.10 | 3.90 | 2.30 | 0.12 | No significant difference. |
| Marital Status | |||||
| Single (N = 83) | Married (N = 63) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 4.00 | 4.03 | 0.09 | 0.69 | No significant difference. |
| CC | 4.05 | 3.90 | 0.21 | 0.21 | No significant difference. |
| Education | |||||
| Certifct. (N = 17) | Diploma (N = 79) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 3.75 | 4.04 | 0.20 | 0.05 | Significant difference at 0.05 level |
| CC | 3.66 | 3.99 | 0.01 | 0.10 | Significant difference at 0.10 |
| Certifct. (N = 17) | BSc. (N = 50) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 3.75 | 4.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | Significant difference at 0.05 level |
| CC | 3.66 | 4.09 | 0.00 | 0.04 | Significant difference at 0.05 level |
| Diploma (N = 79) | BSc. (N = 50) | F | T (sig.) | ||
| PSS | 4.04 | 4.06 | 0.10 | 0.79 | No significant difference. |
| CC | 3.99 | 4.09 | 0.02 | 0.49 | No significant difference. |