Literature DB >> 29320316

Translabial US and Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor: Normal Anatomy and Dysfunction.

Luciana P Chamié1, Duarte Miguel Ferreira Rodrigues Ribeiro1, Angela H M Caiado1, Gisele Warmbrand1, Paulo C Serafini1.   

Abstract

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common condition that typically affects women older than 50 years and decreases the quality of life. Weakening of support structures can involve all three pelvic compartments and cause a combination of symptoms, including constipation, urinary and fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation, pelvic pain, perineal bulging, and sexual dysfunction. The causes of PFD are complex and multifactorial; however, vaginal delivery is considered a major predisposing factor. Physical examination alone is limited in the evaluation of PFD; it frequently leads to an underestimation of the involved compartments. Imaging has an important role in the clinical evaluation, yielding invaluable information for patient counseling and surgical planning. Three- and four-dimensional translabial ultrasonography (US) is a relatively new imaging modality with high accuracy in the evaluation of PFD such as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and puborectalis avulsion. Evaluation of mesh implants is another important indication for this modality. Dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvic floor is a well-established modality for pelvic floor evaluation, with high-resolution images yielding detailed anatomic information and dynamic sequences yielding functional data. Specific protocols and dedicated image interpretation are required with both of these imaging methods. In this article, the authors review the normal anatomy of the female pelvic floor by using a practical approach, discuss the roles of translabial US and MR imaging in the investigation of PFD, describe the most appropriate imaging protocols, and illustrate the most common imaging findings of PFD in the anterior, middle, and posterior compartments of the pelvis. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29320316     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  7 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Use of Dynamic MRI of the Pelvic Floor in the Assessment of Anterior Compartment Disorders.

Authors:  Ayushi P Gupta; Prerna Raj Pandya; My-Linh Nguyen; Tola Fashokun; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Effects of Different Delivery Modes on Pelvic Floor Function in Parturients 6-8 Weeks after Delivery Using Transperineal Four-Dimensional Ultrasound.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Qirong Wang; Xuemei Zhao; Xia Wang; Wenji Zhou; Liqing Kang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Pelvic floor assessment using magnetic resonance imaging after vaginal delivery and elective caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Beibei Zhou; Hongbo Zhang; Jianpeng Yuan; Chao Bu; Weijian Lai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Deep learning-based pelvic levator hiatus segmentation from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Zeping Huang; Enze Qu; Yishuang Meng; Man Zhang; Qiuwen Wei; Xianghui Bai; Xinling Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance defecography findings of dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Nuray Haliloglu; Ayse Erden
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-20

7.  The Engagement of the Pelvic Floor Muscles to the Urethra, Does Variation in Point of Action Exist?

Authors:  Frank-Jan van Geen; Henriëtte M Y de Jong; Tom P V M de Jong; Keetje L de Mooij
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.