Pierre Delanaye1, Martin Flamant2, Laurence Dubourg3,4, Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot2, Sandrine Lemoine3, Etienne Cavalier5, Elke Schaeffner6, Natalie Ebert6, Hans Pottel7. 1. Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, University of Liège (CHU ULg), Liège, Belgium. 2. Department of Renal Physiology, DHU-FIRE, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, Inserm U1149, and Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France. 3. Néphrologie, Dialyse, Hypertension artérielle et Exploration fonctionnelle rénale, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. 4. Laboratory of Tissue Biology and Therapeutic Engineering, UMR 5305 CNRS, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France. 5. Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège (CHU ULg), Liège, Belgium. 6. Charité University Hospital, Institute of Public Health, Berlin, Germany. 7. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Abstract
Background: There are many different ways to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using various exogenous filtration markers, each having their own strengths and limitations. However, not only the marker, but also the methodology may vary in many ways, including the use of urinary or plasma clearance, and, in the case of plasma clearance, the number of time points used to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve, ranging from only one (Jacobsson method) to eight (or more) blood samples. Methods: We collected the results obtained from 5106 plasma clearances (iohexol or 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) using three to four time points, allowing GFR calculation using the slope-intercept method and the Bröchner-Mortensen correction. For each time point, the Jacobsson formula was applied to obtain the single-sample GFR. We used Bland-Altman plots to determine the accuracy of the Jacobsson method at each time point. Results: The single-sample method showed within 10% concordances with the multiple-sample method of 66.4%, 83.6%, 91.4% and 96.0% at the time points 120, 180, 240 and ≥300 min, respectively. Concordance was poorer at lower GFR levels, and this trend is in parallel with increasing age. Results were similar in males and females. Some discordance was found in the obese subjects. Conclusion: Single-sample GFR is highly concordant with a multiple-sample strategy, except in the low GFR range (<30 mL/min).
Background: There are many different ways to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using various exogenous filtration markers, each having their own strengths and limitations. However, not only the marker, but also the methodology may vary in many ways, including the use of urinary or plasma clearance, and, in the case of plasma clearance, the number of time points used to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve, ranging from only one (Jacobsson method) to eight (or more) blood samples. Methods: We collected the results obtained from 5106 plasma clearances (iohexol or 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) using three to four time points, allowing GFR calculation using the slope-intercept method and the Bröchner-Mortensen correction. For each time point, the Jacobsson formula was applied to obtain the single-sample GFR. We used Bland-Altman plots to determine the accuracy of the Jacobsson method at each time point. Results: The single-sample method showed within 10% concordances with the multiple-sample method of 66.4%, 83.6%, 91.4% and 96.0% at the time points 120, 180, 240 and ≥300 min, respectively. Concordance was poorer at lower GFR levels, and this trend is in parallel with increasing age. Results were similar in males and females. Some discordance was found in the obese subjects. Conclusion: Single-sample GFR is highly concordant with a multiple-sample strategy, except in the low GFR range (<30 mL/min).
Authors: Nori J L Smeets; Esther M M Teunissen; Kim van der Velden; Maurice J P van der Burgh; Demi E Linders; Elodie Teesselink; Dirk-Jan A R Moes; Camilla Tøndel; Rob Ter Heine; Arno van Heijst; Michiel F Schreuder; Saskia N de Wildt Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Thomas Stehlé; Khalil El Karoui; Mehdi Sakka; Ahmad Ismail; Marie Matignon; Philippe Grimbert; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Dominique Prié; Vincent Audard Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2019-07-21
Authors: Jonas Björk; Ulf Nyman; Marie Courbebaisse; Lionel Couzi; R Neil Dalton; Laurence Dubourg; Natalie Ebert; Björn O Eriksen; Francois Gaillard; Cyril Garrouste; Anders Grubb; Magnus Hansson; Lola Jacquemont; Ian Jones; Nassim Kamar; Edmund J Lamb; Christophe Legendre; Karin Littmann; Christophe Mariat; Toralf Melsom; Lionel Rostaing; Andrew D Rule; Elke Schaeffner; Per-Ola Sundin; Stephen Turner; Anna Åkesson; Pierre Delanaye; Hans Pottel Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2020-06-13
Authors: Pierre Delanaye; Laurence Dubourg; Martin Flamant; Eric Yayo; Justine B Bukabau; Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot; Sandrine Lemoine; Etienne Cavalier; Elke Schaeffner; Dagui Monnet; Ernest K Sumaili; Natalie Ebert; Hans Pottel Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2020-04-24
Authors: Pierre Delanaye; Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot; Thomas Stehlé; Laurence Dubourg; François Gaillard; Gunnar Sterner; Christine A White; Sandrine Lemoine; Vincent Audard; Dominique Prié; Etienne Cavalier; Marie Courbebaisse; Hans Pottel; Martin Flamant Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2021-03-31
Authors: Hans Pottel; Karolien Goffin; Liesbeth De Waele; Elena Levtchenko; Pierre Delanaye Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 1.889