Literature DB >> 29318458

Diagnostic performance of blood culture bottles for vitreous culture compared to conventional microbiological cultures in patients with suspected endophthalmitis.

Jan Kehrmann1, Valerie Chapot2, Jan Buer2, Philipp Rating3, Norbert Bornfeld3, Joerg Steinmann4,5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of blood culture bottles in comparison to conventional microbiological culture techniques in detecting causative microorganisms of endophthalmitis and to determine their anti-infective susceptibility profiles. All consecutive cases with clinically suspected endophthalmitis in a university-based ophthalmology department between January 2009 and December 2016 were analysed in this retrospective comparative case series. Samples from 247 patients with suspected endophthalmitis underwent microbiological diagnostic work-up. All three culture methods were performed from 140 vitreous specimens. Vitreous fluid specimens were inoculated in blood culture bottles, aerobic and anaerobic broth solutions, and on solid media. Anti-infective susceptibility profiles were evaluated by semi-automated methods and/or gradient diffusion methods. Microorganisms were grown in 82 of 140 specimens for which all methods were performed (59%). Microorganisms were more frequently grown from blood culture bottles (55%) compared to broth solution (45%, p = 0.007) and solid media (33%, p < 0.0001). Considerable differences in the performance among culture media were detected for fungal pathogens. All grown fungi were detected by blood culture bottles (11 of 11, 100%). Broth solution recovered 64% and solid media 46% of grown fungi. No Gram-positive bacterium was resistant to vancomycin and all Gram-negative pathogens except for one isolate were susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins. In suspected endophthalmitis patients, blood culture bottles have a higher overall pathogen detection rate from vitreous fluid compared to conventional microbiological media, especially for fungi. The initial intravitreal antibiotic therapy with vancomycin plus third-generation cephalosporins appears to be an appropriate treatment approach for bacterial endophthalmitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29318458     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3182-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  24 in total

1.  Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates: part I. Postoperative endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis Research Group.

Authors:  D Y Kunimoto; T Das; S Sharma; S Jalali; A B Majji; U Gopinathan; S Athmanathan; T N Rao
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Emergence of azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis in HSCT recipients in Germany.

Authors:  J Steinmann; A Hamprecht; M J G T Vehreschild; O A Cornely; D Buchheidt; B Spiess; M Koldehoff; J Buer; J F Meis; P-M Rath
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Blood culture and conventional media for vitreous culture in infectious endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Yosanan Yospaiboon; Sarawuth Saree; Sirichai Pasadhika
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2005-05

4.  Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis: causative organisms, management strategies, and visual acuity outcomes.

Authors:  Ahila Lingappan; Charles C Wykoff; Thomas A Albini; Darlene Miller; Avinash Pathengay; Janet L Davis; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Broth culture yield vs traditional approach in the work-up of endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Assaf Kratz; Jaime Levy; Nadav Belfair; Orly Weinstein; Itamar Klemperer; Tova Lifshitz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis.

Authors:  G B Melo; P J M Bispo; M C Z Yu; A C C Pignatari; A L Höfling-Lima
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Blood culture bottles are superior to conventional media for vitreous culture.

Authors:  Patsuda Thariya; Yosanan Yospaiboon; Suthasinee Sinawat; Thuss Sanguansak; Chavakij Bhoomibunchoo; Wipada Laovirojjanakul
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  The use of blood culture bottles in endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Ilker Eser; Ziya Kapran; Tugrul Altan; Hakan Eren; Omer Faruk Yilmaz
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Causative Microorganisms of Infectious Endophthalmitis: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Fang Duan; Kaili Wu; Jingyu Liao; Yongxin Zheng; Zhaohui Yuan; Junlian Tan; Xiaofeng Lin
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Comparison of methods for identifying causative bacterial microorganisms in presumed acute endophthalmitis: conventional culture, blood culture, and PCR.

Authors:  Pear Pongsachareonnont; Worawalun Honglertnapakul; Tanittha Chatsuwan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of pediatric blood culture bottles for acute postoperative endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Tatiana Tanaka; Bruno Fortaleza de Aquino Ferreira; Luiza Manhezi Shin de Oliveira; Juliana Mika Kato; Thais Sabato Romano Di Gioia; Flavia Rossi; Yoshitaka Nakashima; Sergio Luis Gianotti Pimentel; Joyce Hisae Yamamoto; Joao Nobrega de Almeida Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 2.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Diagnosis of Ocular Infections.

Authors:  Sixto M Leal; Kyle G Rodino; W Craig Fowler; Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 50.129

Review 3.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update.

Authors:  Ciprian Danielescu; Horia Tudor Stanca; Raluca-Eugenia Iorga; Diana-Maria Darabus; Vasile Potop
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.