PURPOSE: To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. The following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility. RESULTS: A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. Of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus(CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans(18%), and Staphylococcus aureus(13%). The antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%. CONCLUSION: Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. Of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published.
PURPOSE: To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. The following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility. RESULTS: A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. Of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus(CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans(18%), and Staphylococcus aureus(13%). The antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%. CONCLUSION: Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. Of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published.
Authors: D Y Kunimoto; T Das; S Sharma; S Jalali; A B Majji; U Gopinathan; S Athmanathan; T N Rao Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Michelle C Callegan; Michael Engelbert; David W Parke; Bradley D Jett; Michael S Gilmore Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: N Okhravi; P Adamson; N Carroll; A Dunlop; M M Matheson; H M Towler; S Lightman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: P Goldschmidt; S Degorge; D Benallaoua; E Basli; L Batellier; S Boutboul; C Allouch; V Borderie; L Laroche; C Chaumeil Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Jonathan I Huz; Krishna Mukkamala; Ivelisse Rodriguez Pagan; David Ritterband; Mahendra Shah; Ronald C Gentile; Michael Engelbert Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 3.117