| Literature DB >> 29317880 |
Saeed Sadooghian1, Hossein Mahmoudvand2, Mohammad Ali Mohammadi1, Naser Nazari Sarcheshmeh3, Amir Tavakoli Kareshk1, Hossein Kamiabi1, Naser Zia-Ali1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of IgM and IgG anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies and the associated risk factors among healthy blood donors in Khorasan Razavi Province, northeast of Iran from Nov 2014 to May 2015.Entities:
Keywords: Blood transfusion; IgG antibody; IgM antibody; Iran; Nested-PCR; Toxoplasmosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29317880 PMCID: PMC5756305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Parasitol ISSN: 1735-7020 Impact factor: 1.012
Demographic characteristics and T. gondii sero-prevalence among healthy blood donors in Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran
| Male | 461 (93.9) | (37.3) | (2.4) |
| Female | 30 (6.1) | (40) | 16.7 |
| 18–30 | 161 (32.8) | 36 | 0 |
| 30–40 | 170 (34.6) | 39.4 | 0.58 |
| 40–50 | 116 (23.6) | 34.5 | 4.3 |
| 50–60 | 42(8.6) | 42.8 | 23.8 |
| >60yrs | 2 (4) | 0.5 | 0 |
| Urban | 421 (85.5) | 38.2 | 2.9 |
| Rural | 70 (14.3) | 32.9 | 5.7 |
| Less than diploma | 200 (40.7) | 29.5 | 4.5 |
| Diploma and above | 291 (59.3) | 43 | 2.4 |
| A | 150 (30.5) | 35.3 | 4 |
| B | 150 (30.5) | 33.3 | 3.3 |
| AB | 46 (9.4) | 39.1 | 2.2 |
| O | 145 (29.5) | 43.4 | 2.8 |
| No | 478 (97.4) | 37.7 | 3.1 |
| Yes | 13 (2.6) | 308 | 7.7 |
| No | 443 (90.2) | 37.7 | 2.9 |
| Yes | 48 (9.8) | 35.4 | 6.3 |
| No | 346 (70.5) | 38.2 | 3.5 |
| Yes | 145 (29.5) | 35.9 | 2.8 |
| No | 478 (97.4) | 37.4 | 3.3 |
| Yes | 13 (2.6) | 38.5 | 0 |
Univariate (crude OR) logistic regression analysis of the potential factors associated with T. gondii IgG seroprevalence among healthy blood donors in Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran
| Male | 1 | - |
| Female | 1.5 (0.7, 3.1) | 0.29 |
| 18–30 | - | - |
| 30–40 | - | - |
| 40–50 | - | - |
| 50–60 | - | - |
| >60 | 1.6 | 0.001 |
| Urban | 1 | 0.64 |
| Rural | 1.13 (0.675, 1.9) | |
| Less than diploma | 1 | - |
| Diploma and above | 1.5 (1.15, 2.3) | 0.14 |
| A | 1 | - |
| B | 0.97 (0.16, 1.5) | 0.91 |
| AB | 0.59 (0.29, 1.21) | 0.15 |
| O | 0.84 (0.52, 1.34) | 0.46 |
| No | 1 | - |
| Yes | 1.44 (0.47, 4.36) | 0.51 |
| 1 | - | |
| No | 2.1 (1.14, 3.88) | 0.018 |
| Yes | ||
| No | 1 | - |
| Yes | 1.16 (0.78, 1.73) | 0.45 |
| No | 1 | - |
| Yes | 1.27 (0.65, 2.46) | 0.49 |
| No | 1 | - |
| Yes | 0.49 (0.13,1.81) | 0.29 |
Fig. 1:B1-nested PCR analysis of T. gondii DNA (531 bp). Lane 1–16:IgM-positive blood samples; C-: negative control (D.W); C+: positive control (T.gondii RH strain); ntc: negative test control (T.gondii negative sample); (ladder (100 bp)
Fig. 2:RE-nested PCR analysis of T. gondii DNA (164bp). Lane 1–16:IgM-positive blood samples; nc: negative control (D.W); pc: positive control (T.gondii RH strain); ladder (100 bp)