| Literature DB >> 29317649 |
Erminia Fardone1,2, Benoît Pouyatos3, Elke Bräuer-Krisch1, Stefan Bartzsch4,5, Hervè Mathieu3, Herwig Requardt1, Domenico Bucci6, Giacomo Barbone7, Paola Coan7,8, Giuseppe Battaglia6, Geraldine Le Duc1, Alberto Bravin1, Pantaleo Romanelli9.
Abstract
Synchrotron-generated microplanar beams (microbeams) provide the most stereo-selective irradiation modality known today. This novel irradiation modality has been shown to control seizures originating from eloquent cortex causing no neurological deficit in experimental animals. To test the hypothesis that application of microbeams in the hippocampus, the most common source of refractory seizures, is safe and does not induce severe side effects, we used microbeams to induce transections to the hippocampus of healthy rats. An array of parallel microbeams carrying an incident dose of 600 Gy was delivered to the rat hippocampus. Immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated γ-H2AX showed cell death along the microbeam irradiation paths in rats 48 hours after irradiation. No evident behavioral or neurological deficits were observed during the 3-month period of observation. MR imaging showed no signs of radio-induced edema or radionecrosis 3 months after irradiation. Histological analysis showed a very well preserved hippocampal cytoarchitecture and confirmed the presence of clear-cut microscopic transections across the hippocampus. These data support the use of synchrotron-generated microbeams as a novel tool to slice the hippocampus of living rats in a minimally invasive way, providing (i) a novel experimental model to study hippocampal function and (ii) a new treatment tool for patients affected by refractory epilepsy induced by mesial temporal sclerosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29317649 PMCID: PMC5760574 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18000-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Microbeam dosimetry and schematic representation of irradiation geometry. (A) Plot of the lateral dose profile in water. (B) Sagittal section of the Paxinos and Watson’s rat brain atlas[30] showing the geometry of microbeam irradiation. Coronal section of the left hippocampus irradiation is shown in (C). The irradiation of the right hippocampus is specular to (C). Arrays of 75 μm thick microbeams (9 beams, center-to-center spacing: 400 μm) were delivered perpendicular to the dorsal hippocampus (from −3 mm to −5 mm posterior to the bregma) using an atlas-based image guided X-ray setup.
Figure 2Coronal and axial views of the rat showing peak dose (A), valley dose (B) and peak to valley dose ratios (PVDR) (C). Doses are normalized such that the peak dose at 3 mm depth in a homogeneous water phantom would be 600 Gy. The microbeam field contains 9 parallel 75 µm wide and 2 mm high microbeams with a center-to-center spacing of 400 µm. The peak dose is between 520 and 590 Gy in the brain, depending on the distance from the beam entrance; the valley dose ranges between 6.4 and 6.8 Gy. The PVDR measures between 80 and 87. The figures overlay Hounsfield units of a computed tomography image acquired at the ESRF at 35 keV (in gray) and doses using the color scale on the right.
Figure 3Microbeams induce early cell death. Immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated γ-H2AX-positive cells (in red) and Ki67-positive cells (in green) in the rat dorsal hippocampus 48 hours after microbeam irradiation (A). Magnification of the square in A (B). Ki67-positive cells are visible within and between the microbeam path (C). Higher magnification of C (D).
Figure 4MRI does not show any sign of radionecrosis or radio-induced edema. Representative T1-weighted post-contrast (A) and T2-weighted (B) MRI performed 3 months after irradiation of the left dorsal hippocampus are shown. Blue lines indicate the irradiation zone in the left dorsal hippocampus. Note the absence of any sign of brain damage induced by the microbeams (peak dose: 600 Gy). Quantification of left and right dorsal hippocampal volumes in control unirradiated rats and in irradiated rats. Values were calculated directly from the DICOM images and are the means ± SD (n = 2–4). Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA (p = 0.992, irradiation x brain area) (C).
Figure 5Histological analysis of rat hippocampus 3 months after microbeam-induced transections. Clear-cut transections through the hippocampus are visible with no evident collateral damage (A). Overlay of the histology over the equivalent slice taken from the Paxinos and Watson rat brain atlas. The hippocampal architecture is very well preserved (B). The square in the dentate gyrus in (A) is highlighted at higher magnification in (C). Note that the hippocampal layers near to the transections are not affected.