Literature DB >> 29315628

Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.

Anna Barth1, Daniel Schneider1.   

Abstract

Visual working memory representations can be shielded from interference by selective attentional focusing using retroactive cues (retro-cues). However, it is not clear how many representations can be effectively cued and which neural mechanisms provide the protection from distractors. To address these questions, we manipulated the number of attended items by means of a retro-cue (one, two, or three items) and presented a distractor display during the retention of information in working memory. Analyses of the raw error and a mixture model revealed that a general performance benefit was only present when one item was retro-cued. Nevertheless, a protection of the item representations against subsequent interference occurred also after a two-item cue. ERPs revealed a modulation of the posterior negative slow wave following the retro-cues, reflecting the applied working memory resources dependent on the number of attended representations. Further, the distractor information was encoded into working memory only when the number of attended items was not changed by the retro-cues (neutral and three-item conditions), reflected by a P3b following the distractor display. These results suggest that more than one item can be effectively protected from perceptual interference. We propose that the protective effect of selective attention within working memory is based on both a reduction of the number of focused representations and the attentional refreshing of item context and features.
© 2018 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; P3; attention; cognitive control; retro-cue; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29315628     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  4 in total

Review 1.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: harmony but not uniformity.

Authors:  Sizhu Han; Yixuan Ku
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-09

4.  Measuring and Maximizing Undivided Attention in the Context of Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  You Chen; Julia Adler-Milstein; Christine A Sinsky
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.762

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.