| Literature DB >> 29315271 |
An-Qi Lu1, Ming-Hua Chen2, Jie Gao3, Lu Wang4, Han-Yu Yang5, Lan Li6, Bo Zhang7, Hao-Ke He8, Su-Juan Wang9.
Abstract
Sanggenon X, an unusual tri-O-bridged Diels-Alder adduct, was isolated from Cortex Mori Radicis. Its structure was established by spectroscopic analysis, including NMR and HR-MS (High Resolution Mass Spectrometry). Sanggenon X contained three O-bridged rings, where the oxygenated bridgeheads were all quaternary carbons. Chemical methylation was carried out to deduce the linkages of the three O-bridges. The absolute configuration was determined by calculating the ECD (Electronic Circular Dichroism) using the TDDFT (Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory) method. Sanggenon X showed significant antioxidant activity against Fe2+-Cys-induced lipid peroxidation in rat liver microsomes, and was as effective as the positive control, curcumin.Entities:
Keywords: Cortex Mori Radicis; Diels-Alder adduct; Morus; antioxidation; calculated ECD
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29315271 PMCID: PMC6017575 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23010133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of sanggenon X (1).
NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1, 1a, and 1b in DMSO-d6 (J in Hz).
| Position | 1 | 1a | 1b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 115.2 | 118.2 | 118.4 | |||
| 2 | 156.0 | 156.8 | 158.4 | |||
| 3 | 6.30 s | 102.5 | 6.57 d (2.2) | 98.4 | 6.51 s c | 98.7 |
| 4 | 158.1 | 160.4 | 161.1 | |||
| 5 | 6.23 d (8.4) a | 107.1 | 6.54 dd (8.8, 2.2) | 105.6 | 6.50 d (8.4) c | 106.2 |
| 6 | 7.30 d (8.4) | 127.2 | 7.49 d (8.8) | 127.6 | 7.45 d (8.4) | 128.3 |
| α | 7.09 d (16.2) | 123.1 | 7.16 d (16.5) | 123.1 | 7.15 d (16.8) | 124.6 |
| β | 6.74 d (16.2) | 124.7 | 6.91 d (16.5) | 127.0 | 6.89 d (16.8) | 126.6 |
| 1′ | 139.3 | 139.3 | 141.8 | |||
| 2′ | 6.16 s | 105.7 | 6.42 s b | 101.1 | 6.56 s | 104.5 |
| 3′ | 154.2 | 157.7 | 155.7 | |||
| 4′ | 110.7 | 110.7 | 110.7 | |||
| 5′ | 159.2 | 157.8 | 161.8 | |||
| 6′ | 6.44 s | 98.8 | 6.41 s | 101.7 | 6.36 s | 100.1 |
| 1″ | 74.4 | 75.9 | 76.4 | |||
| 2″ | 109.1 | 193.6 | 148.0 | |||
| 3″ | 3.17 s | 47.3 | 127.7 | 122.4 | ||
| 4″ | 91.4 | 160.4 | 99.4 | |||
| 5″ | 2.66 brs | 36.6 | 3.84 t (3.0) | 33.7 | N.D. | 33.9 |
| 6″ | 2.51 d (13.8) * | 30.1 | 2.65 dd (13.3, 3.0) | 35.6 | 2.28 dd (13.5, 1.2) | 31.3 |
| 7″ | 1.61 s | 22.1 | 1.57 s | 22.7 | 1.57 s | 23.2 |
| 8″ | 194.9 | 193.0 | 202.1 | |||
| 9″ | 112.8 | 119.4 | 120.7 | |||
| 10″ | 166.2 | 159.7 | 159.6 | |||
| 11″ | 6.09 s | 97.6 | 6.39 d (1.9) | 97.5 | 6.62 d (2.1) | 99.0 |
| 12″ | 171.6 | 164.2 | 163.6 | |||
| 13″ | 6.48 d (8.7) | 111.4 | 6.33 dd (8.8, 1.9) | 105.3 | 6.50 dd (8.7, 2.1) c | 105.8 |
| 14″ | 7.44 d (8.7) | 125.7 | 7.04 d (8.8) | 131.3 | 7.24 d (8.7) | 131.5 |
| 15″ | 107.9 | 115.1 | 112.9 | |||
| 16″ | 154.6 | 153.8 | 154.9 | |||
| 17″ | 6.23 s a | 106.5 | 6.47 d (2.4) | 101.4 | 6.27 d (2.4) | 101.5 |
| 18″ | 157.7 | 160.2 | 160.0 | |||
| 19″ | 6.22 d (9.0) a | 101.9 | 6.43 dd (8.4, 2.4) b | 106.7 | 6.43 dd (8.4, 2.4) | 106.9 |
| 20″ | 6.51 d (9.0) | 133.3 | 6.97 d (8.4) | 129.5 | 7.12 d (8.4) | 133.0 |
a–c The signals overlapped with each other. * Half of this signal was overlapped by a solvent peak. Measured at 150 MHz † or 125 MHz ‡ for 13C.
Figure 2Key correlations of compounds 1, 1a, and 1b in HMBC and NOESY spectra.
Figure 3Methylation of compound 1.
Figure 4Experimental and calculated ECD (Electronic Circular Dichroism) of compound 1.
Figure 5Plausible biosynthetic pathway of compound 1.