Tom E Nightingale1,2, Ashraf S Gorgey1,2. 1. Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA. 2. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of existing basal metabolic rate (BMR) prediction equations in men with chronic (>1 yr) spinal cord injury (SCI). The primary aim is to develop new SCI population-specific BMR prediction models, based on anthropometric, body composition, and/or demographic variables that are strongly associated with BMR. METHODS: Thirty men with chronic SCI (paraplegic, n = 21, tetraplegic, n = 9) 35 ± 11 yr old (mean ± SD) participated in this cross-sectional study. Criterion BMR values were measured by indirect calorimetry. Body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and anthropometric measurements (circumferences and diameters) were also taken. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to develop new SCI-specific BMR prediction models. Criterion BMR values were compared with values estimated from six existing and four developed prediction equations. RESULTS: Existing equations that use information on stature, weight, and/or age significantly (P < 0.001) overpredicted measured BMR by a mean of 14%-17% (187-234 kcal·d). Equations that used fat-free mass (FFM) accurately predicted BMR. The development of new SCI-specific prediction models demonstrated that the addition of anthropometric variables (weight, height, and calf circumference) to FFM (model 3; r = 0.77), explained 8% more of the variance in BMR than FFM alone (model 1; r = 0.69). Using anthropometric variables, without FFM, explained less of the variance in BMR (model 4; r = 0.57). However, all the developed prediction models demonstrated acceptable mean absolute error ≤6%. CONCLUSION: BMR can be more accurately estimated when dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived FFM is incorporated into prediction equations. Using anthropometric measurements provides a promising alternative to improve the prediction of BMR, beyond that achieved by existing equations in persons with SCI.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of existing basal metabolic rate (BMR) prediction equations in men with chronic (>1 yr) spinal cord injury (SCI). The primary aim is to develop new SCI population-specific BMR prediction models, based on anthropometric, body composition, and/or demographic variables that are strongly associated with BMR. METHODS: Thirty men with chronic SCI (paraplegic, n = 21, tetraplegic, n = 9) 35 ± 11 yr old (mean ± SD) participated in this cross-sectional study. Criterion BMR values were measured by indirect calorimetry. Body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and anthropometric measurements (circumferences and diameters) were also taken. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to develop new SCI-specific BMR prediction models. Criterion BMR values were compared with values estimated from six existing and four developed prediction equations. RESULTS: Existing equations that use information on stature, weight, and/or age significantly (P < 0.001) overpredicted measured BMR by a mean of 14%-17% (187-234 kcal·d). Equations that used fat-free mass (FFM) accurately predicted BMR. The development of new SCI-specific prediction models demonstrated that the addition of anthropometric variables (weight, height, and calf circumference) to FFM (model 3; r = 0.77), explained 8% more of the variance in BMR than FFM alone (model 1; r = 0.69). Using anthropometric variables, without FFM, explained less of the variance in BMR (model 4; r = 0.57). However, all the developed prediction models demonstrated acceptable mean absolute error ≤6%. CONCLUSION: BMR can be more accurately estimated when dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived FFM is incorporated into prediction equations. Using anthropometric measurements provides a promising alternative to improve the prediction of BMR, beyond that achieved by existing equations in persons with SCI.
Authors: Gary J Farkas; Alicia Sneij; David W McMillan; Eduard Tiozzo; Mark S Nash; David R Gater Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 4.125
Authors: Werner L Popp; Sophie Schneider; Jessica Bär; Philipp Bösch; Christina M Spengler; Roger Gassert; Armin Curt Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Laura C O'Brien; Zachary A Graham; Qun Chen; Edward J Lesnefsky; Christopher Cardozo; Ashraf S Gorgey Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 2.772