Literature DB >> 29314274

Small angle X-ray scattering and cross-linking for data assisted protein structure prediction in CASP 12 with prospects for improved accuracy.

Tadeusz L Ogorzalek1, Greg L Hura1, Adam Belsom2, Kathryn H Burnett1, Andriy Kryshtafovych3, John A Tainer1,4, Juri Rappsilber2,5, Susan E Tsutakawa1, Krzysztof Fidelis3.   

Abstract

Experimental data offers empowering constraints for structure prediction. These constraints can be used to filter equivalently scored models or more powerfully within optimization functions toward prediction. In CASP12, Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) and Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry (CLMS) data, measured on an exemplary set of novel fold targets, were provided to the CASP community of protein structure predictors. As solution-based techniques, SAXS and CLMS can efficiently measure states of the full-length sequence in its native solution conformation and assembly. However, this experimental data did not substantially improve prediction accuracy judged by fits to crystallographic models. One issue, beyond intrinsic limitations of the algorithms, was a disconnect between crystal structures and solution-based measurements. Our analyses show that many targets had substantial percentages of disordered regions (up to 40%) or were multimeric or both. Thus, solution measurements of flexibility and assembly support variations that may confound prediction algorithms trained on crystallographic data and expecting globular fully-folded monomeric proteins. Here, we consider the CLMS and SAXS data collected, the information in these solution measurements, and the challenges in incorporating them into computational prediction. As improvement opportunities were only partly realized in CASP12, we provide guidance on how data from the full-length biological unit and the solution state can better aid prediction of the folded monomer or subunit. We furthermore describe strategic integrations of solution measurements with computational prediction programs with the aim of substantially improving foundational knowledge and the accuracy of computational algorithms for biologically-relevant structure predictions for proteins in solution.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SAS; SAXS; assembly; combined methods; crystallography; disorder; experimental restraints; flexibility; modeling; prediction accuracy; protein folding; solution scattering; solution structure; unfolded regions; unstructured regions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29314274      PMCID: PMC6003418          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  54 in total

Review 1.  Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometry: An Integrated Technology to Understand the Structure and Function of Molecular Machines.

Authors:  Alexander Leitner; Marco Faini; Florian Stengel; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

3.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The protein folding problem.

Authors:  Ken A Dill; S Banu Ozkan; M Scott Shell; Thomas R Weikl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 5.  What Combined Measurements From Structures and Imaging Tell Us About DNA Damage Responses.

Authors:  Chris A Brosey; Zamal Ahmed; Susan P Lees-Miller; John A Tainer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  FoXS: a web server for rapid computation and fitting of SAXS profiles.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Michal Hammel; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Software for the high-throughput collection of SAXS data using an enhanced Blu-Ice/DCS control system.

Authors:  Scott Classen; Ivan Rodic; James Holton; Greg L Hura; Michal Hammel; John A Tainer
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.616

8.  Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips.

Authors:  Juri Rappsilber; Matthias Mann; Yasushi Ishihama
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 9.  The diverse and expanding role of mass spectrometry in structural and molecular biology.

Authors:  Philip Lössl; Michiel van de Waterbeemd; Albert Jr Heck
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Blind testing cross-linking/mass spectrometry under the auspices of the 11th critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP11).

Authors:  Adam Belsom; Michael Schneider; Lutz Fischer; Mahmoud Mabrouk; Kolja Stahl; Oliver Brock; Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2016-12-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  Assessment of chemical-crosslink-assisted protein structure modeling in CASP13.

Authors:  J Eduardo Fajardo; Rojan Shrestha; Nelson Gil; Adam Belsom; Silvia N Crivelli; Cezary Czaplewski; Krzysztof Fidelis; Sergei Grudinin; Mikhail Karasikov; Agnieszka S Karczyńska; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Alexander Leitner; Adam Liwo; Emilia A Lubecka; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Guillaume Pagès; Juri Rappsilber; Adam K Sieradzan; Celina Sikorska; Esben Trabjerg; Andras Fiser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-07

3.  Protein structure prediction assisted with sparse NMR data in CASP13.

Authors:  Davide Sala; Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Casey A Cole; David A Snyder; Gaohua Liu; Yojiro Ishida; G V T Swapna; Kelly P Brock; Chris Sander; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Masayori Inouye; Roberto Tejero; Homayoun Valafar; Antonio Rosato; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-12

4.  Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Dmytro Guzenko; Aleix Lafita; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Jose M Duarte
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-27

5.  Small angle X-ray scattering-assisted protein structure prediction in CASP13 and emergence of solution structure differences.

Authors:  Greg L Hura; Curtis D Hodge; Daniel Rosenberg; Dmytro Guzenko; Jose M Duarte; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Sergei Grudinin; Andriy Kryshtafovych; John A Tainer; Krzysztof Fidelis; Susan E Tsutakawa
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-16

6.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIII.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-23

7.  SAXSDom: Modeling multidomain protein structures using small-angle X-ray scattering data.

Authors:  Jie Hou; Badri Adhikari; John J Tanner; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-12-27

8.  An integrated workflow for crosslinking mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marta L Mendes; Lutz Fischer; Zhuo A Chen; Marta Barbon; Francis J O'Reilly; Sven H Giese; Michael Bohlke-Schneider; Adam Belsom; Therese Dau; Colin W Combe; Martin Graham; Markus R Eisele; Wolfgang Baumeister; Christian Speck; Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.429

Review 9.  Evolving SAXS versatility: solution X-ray scattering for macromolecular architecture, functional landscapes, and integrative structural biology.

Authors:  Chris A Brosey; John A Tainer
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Improved Consensus-Fragment Selection in Template-Assisted Prediction of Protein Structures with the UNRES Force Field in CASP13.

Authors:  Agnieszka S Karczyńska; Karolina Ziȩba; Urszula Uciechowska; Magdalena A Mozolewska; Paweł Krupa; Emilia A Lubecka; Agnieszka G Lipska; Celina Sikorska; Sergey A Samsonov; Adam K Sieradzan; Artur Giełdoń; Adam Liwo; Rafał Ślusarz; Magdalena Ślusarz; Jooyoung Lee; Keehyoung Joo; Cezary Czaplewski
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.956

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.