Literature DB >> 31603581

Protein structure prediction assisted with sparse NMR data in CASP13.

Davide Sala1,2, Yuanpeng Janet Huang3,4, Casey A Cole5, David A Snyder6, Gaohua Liu3,7, Yojiro Ishida3,8, G V T Swapna3, Kelly P Brock9, Chris Sander10,11, Krzysztof Fidelis12, Andriy Kryshtafovych12, Masayori Inouye8, Roberto Tejero13, Homayoun Valafar5, Antonio Rosato1,2, Gaetano T Montelione3,4,8.   

Abstract

CASP13 has investigated the impact of sparse NMR data on the accuracy of protein structure prediction. NOESY and 15 N-1 H residual dipolar coupling data, typical of that obtained for 15 N,13 C-enriched, perdeuterated proteins up to about 40 kDa, were simulated for 11 CASP13 targets ranging in size from 80 to 326 residues. For several targets, two prediction groups generated models that are more accurate than those produced using baseline methods. Real NMR data collected for a de novo designed protein were also provided to predictors, including one data set in which only backbone resonance assignments were available. Some NMR-assisted prediction groups also did very well with these data. CASP13 also assessed whether incorporation of sparse NMR data improves the accuracy of protein structure prediction relative to nonassisted regular methods. In most cases, incorporation of sparse, noisy NMR data results in models with higher accuracy. The best NMR-assisted models were also compared with the best regular predictions of any CASP13 group for the same target. For six of 13 targets, the most accurate model provided by any NMR-assisted prediction group was more accurate than the most accurate model provided by any regular prediction group; however, for the remaining seven targets, one or more regular prediction method provided a more accurate model than even the best NMR-assisted model. These results suggest a novel approach for protein structure determination, in which advanced prediction methods are first used to generate structural models, and sparse NMR data is then used to validate and/or refine these models.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; contact prediction; protein modeling; residual dipolar coupling; simulated NMR spectra; sparse NMR data; structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31603581      PMCID: PMC7213643          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  71 in total

1.  How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation?

Authors:  G Marius Clore; Charles D Schwieters
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Protein NMR recall, precision, and F-measure scores (RPF scores): structure quality assessment measures based on information retrieval statistics.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Robert Powers; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  CASD-NMR: critical assessment of automated structure determination by NMR.

Authors:  Antonio Rosato; Anurag Bagaria; David Baker; Benjamin Bardiaux; Andrea Cavalli; Jurgen F Doreleijers; Andrea Giachetti; Paul Guerry; Peter Güntert; Torsten Herrmann; Yuanpeng J Huang; Hendrik R A Jonker; Binchen Mao; Thérèse E Malliavin; Gaetano T Montelione; Michael Nilges; Srivatsan Raman; Gijs van der Schot; Wim F Vranken; Geerten W Vuister; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Protein structure prediction using sparse NOE and RDC restraints with Rosetta in CASP13.

Authors:  Georg Kuenze; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-07-18

7.  Protein structure determination using metagenome sequence data.

Authors:  Sergey Ovchinnikov; Hahnbeom Park; Neha Varghese; Po-Ssu Huang; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; David E Kim; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Nikos C Kyrpides; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Accelerated Profile HMM Searches.

Authors:  Sean R Eddy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation.

Authors:  Debora S Marks; Lucy J Colwell; Robert Sheridan; Thomas A Hopf; Andrea Pagnani; Riccardo Zecchina; Chris Sander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Large-scale determination of previously unsolved protein structures using evolutionary information.

Authors:  Sergey Ovchinnikov; Lisa Kinch; Hahnbeom Park; Yuxing Liao; Jimin Pei; David E Kim; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Nick V Grishin; David Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  6 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-07

2.  AlphaFold Models of Small Proteins Rival the Accuracy of Solution NMR Structures.

Authors:  Roberto Tejero; Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Theresa A Ramelot; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Assessment of prediction methods for protein structures determined by NMR in CASP14: Impact of AlphaFold2.

Authors:  Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Ning Zhang; Beate Bersch; Krzysztof Fidelis; Masayori Inouye; Yojiro Ishida; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Naohiro Kobayashi; Yutaka Kuroda; Gaohua Liu; Andy LiWang; G V T Swapna; Nan Wu; Toshio Yamazaki; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  Conformational ensemble of the TNF-derived peptide solnatide in solution.

Authors:  Pau Martin-Malpartida; Silvia Arrastia-Casado; Josep Farrera-Sinfreu; Rudolf Lucas; Hendrik Fischer; Bernhard Fischer; Douglas C Eaton; Susan Tzotzos; Maria J Macias
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.155

5.  Simultaneous Assignment and Structure Determination of Proteins From Sparsely Labeled NMR Datasets.

Authors:  Arup Mondal; Alberto Perez
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-11-24

6.  Editorial: Computational approaches for interpreting experimental data and understanding protein structure, dynamics and function relationships.

Authors:  Kaifeng Hu; Woonghee Lee; Gaetano T Montelione; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Beat Vögeli
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.