Literature DB >> 29314176

Improved diagnostic stratification of digitised Barrett's oesophagus biopsies by p53 immunohistochemical staining.

Myrtle J van der Wel1,2, Lucas C Duits2, Roos E Pouw2, Cornelis A Seldenrijk3, G J A Offerhaus4, Mike Visser5, Fiebo J Ten Kate4, Katharina Biermann6, Lodewijk A A Brosens4, Michael Doukas6, Clement Huysentruyt7, Arend Karrenbeld8, Gursah Kats-Ugurlu8, Jaap S van der Laan9, G Ineke van Lijnschoten7, Freek C P Moll10, Ariadne H A G Ooms11, Hans van der Valk11, Jan G Tijssen12, Jacques J Bergman2, Sybren L Meijer1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Interobserver agreement for dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is low, and guidelines advise expert review of dysplastic cases. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the homogeneity within a group of dedicated gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty-single haematoxylin and eosin (HE) slide referral BO cases [20 low-grade dysplasia (LGD); 20 high-grade dysplasia (HGD); and 20 non-dysplastic BO reference cases] were digitalised and independently assessed twice in random order by 10 dedicated GI pathologists. After a 'wash-out' period, cases were reassessed with the addition of a corresponding p53 IHC slide. Outcomes were: (i) proportion of 'indefinite for dysplasia' (IND) diagnoses; (ii) interobserver agreement; and (iii) diagnostic accuracy as compared with a consensus 'gold standard' diagnosis defined at an earlier stage by five core expert BO pathologists after their assessment of this case set. Addition of p53 IHC decreased the mean proportion of IND diagnoses from 10 of 60 to eight of 60 (P = 0.071). Mean interobserver agreement increased significantly from 0.45 to 0.57 (P = 0.0021). The mean diagnostic accuracy increased significantly from 72% to 82% (P = 0.0072) after p53 IHC addition.
CONCLUSION: Addition of p53 IHC significantly improves the histological assessment of BO biopsies, even within a group of dedicated GI pathologists. It decreases the proportion of IND diagnoses, and increases interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy. This justifies the use of accessory p53 IHC within our upcoming national digital review panel for BO biopsy cases.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's oesophagus; interobserver agreement; low-grade dysplasia; p53 immunohistochemistry; review panel; whole-slide imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29314176     DOI: 10.1111/his.13462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Killcoyne; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Novel Pathologic Factors for Risk Stratification of Gastric "Indefinite for Dysplasia" Lesions.

Authors:  Kwangil Yim; Jung Ha Shin; Jinyoung Yoo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  A personalized and dynamic risk estimation model: The new paradigm in Barrett's esophagus surveillance.

Authors:  Carlijn A M Roumans; Manon C W Spaander; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Katharina Biermann; Marco J Bruno; Ewout W Steyerberg; Dimitris Rizopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Evolutionary dynamics in Barrett oesophagus: implications for surveillance, risk stratification and therapy.

Authors:  Melissa Schmidt; Richard J Hackett; Ann-Marie Baker; Stuart A C McDonald; Michael Quante; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Adherence to pre-set benchmark quality criteria to qualify as expert assessor of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus biopsies - towards digital review of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  M J van der Wel; E Klaver; L C Duits; R E Pouw; C A Seldenrijk; Gja Offerhaus; M Visser; Fjw Ten Kate; K Biermann; Laa Brosens; M Doukas; C Huysentruyt; A Karrenbeld; G Kats-Ugurlu; J S van der Laan; G van Lijnschoten; Fcp Moll; Ahag Ooms; J G Tijssen; Jjghm Bergman; S L Meijer
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Inflammatory bowel disease- and Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia: the old, the new, and the persistent struggles.

Authors:  Dipti M Karamchandani; Qin Zhang; Xiao-Yan Liao; Jing-Hong Xu; Xiu-Li Liu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-08-13

7.  The risk of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus indefinite for dysplasia: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Richard Phillips; Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Nastazja D Pilonis; Maria O'Donovan; Tarek Sawas; David A Katzka; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Molecular characterization of Barrett's esophagus at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Georg A Busslinger; Buys de Barbanson; Rurika Oka; Bas L A Weusten; Michiel de Maat; Richard van Hillegersberg; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Ruben van Boxtel; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Hans Clevers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Maximilien Barret; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 10.  Neoplastic and pre-neoplastic lesions of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  Federica Grillo; Luca Mastracci; Luca Saragoni; Alessandro Vanoli; Francesco Limarzi; Irene Gullo; Jacopo Ferro; Michele Paudice; Paola Parente; Matteo Fassan
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.