Brian H H Lang1, Yu-Cho Woo2, Keith Wan-Hang Chiu3. 1. Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China. blang@hku.hk. 2. Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. 3. Department of Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the appearance of hyperechoic marks (HEMs) during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of benign thyroid nodules and nodule shrinkage at 6 months. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six patients who underwent HIFU for benign thyroid nodule were analysed. An independent person carefully examined the B-mode ultrasonography screen for the appearance of HEMs after each pulse. The proportion of HEMs (%) was calculated by: [(Number of pulses that resulted in HEMs) / (Total number of pulses given per treatment) × 100] while the nodule shrinkage was measured by volume reduction ratio (VRR) = [Baseline volume-volume at 6 months]/[Baseline volume] * 100. Treatment success was defined as VRR ≥ 50 %. RESULTS: Patients with HEMs (n=91) had significantly greater 6-month VRR than those without HEMs (n=45) (65.76 % vs. 36.76 %, p<0.001). By regression analysis, after adjusting for age and energy per pulse, smaller nodule volume at baseline (OR 1.143, 95 % CI 1.038-1.256, p=0.006) and appearance of HEMs (OR 275.44, 95 % CI 26.63-2848.98, p<0.001) were independent predictors for treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of HEMs during treatment was an independent determinant of treatment success following single-session HIFU ablation of benign thyroid nodule. KEY POINTS: • HIFU is a safe and effective treatment for benign thyroid nodules. • Lower BMI and greater applied power increase likelihood of hyperechoic marks. • The appearance of hyperechoic marks during HIFU affects subsequent treatment outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the appearance of hyperechoic marks (HEMs) during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of benign thyroid nodules and nodule shrinkage at 6 months. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six patients who underwent HIFU for benign thyroid nodule were analysed. An independent person carefully examined the B-mode ultrasonography screen for the appearance of HEMs after each pulse. The proportion of HEMs (%) was calculated by: [(Number of pulses that resulted in HEMs) / (Total number of pulses given per treatment) × 100] while the nodule shrinkage was measured by volume reduction ratio (VRR) = [Baseline volume-volume at 6 months]/[Baseline volume] * 100. Treatment success was defined as VRR ≥ 50 %. RESULTS:Patients with HEMs (n=91) had significantly greater 6-month VRR than those without HEMs (n=45) (65.76 % vs. 36.76 %, p<0.001). By regression analysis, after adjusting for age and energy per pulse, smaller nodule volume at baseline (OR 1.143, 95 % CI 1.038-1.256, p=0.006) and appearance of HEMs (OR 275.44, 95 % CI 26.63-2848.98, p<0.001) were independent predictors for treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of HEMs during treatment was an independent determinant of treatment success following single-session HIFU ablation of benign thyroid nodule. KEY POINTS: • HIFU is a safe and effective treatment for benign thyroid nodules. • Lower BMI and greater applied power increase likelihood of hyperechoic marks. • The appearance of hyperechoic marks during HIFU affects subsequent treatment outcome.
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Priscilla Lai; Christine Tarapacki; William T Tran; Ahmed El Kaffas; Justin Lee; Clinton Hupple; Sarah Iradji; Anoja Giles; Azza Al-Mahrouki; Gregory J Czarnota Journal: Oncoscience Date: 2016-03-24