| Literature DB >> 29312426 |
Marta Marmiroli1, Francesca Mussi1, Davide Imperiale1, Giacomo Lencioni1, Nelson Marmiroli1.
Abstract
The toxic element arsenic interacts with the beneficial element silicon at many levels of the plant metabolism. The ability of the tomato plant to take up and translocate As into its fruit has risen concerns that it could facilitate the entry of this element into the human food chain above the admitted level. Here, the fruit of two contrasting tomato cultivars, Aragon and Gladis, were evaluated following exposures of either 48 h or 14 days to As-contaminated irrigation water, with or without supplementary Si. The focus was on selected biochemical stress response indicators to dissect metabolic fruit reprogramming induced by As and Si. A multivariate statistical approach was utilized to establish the relationship between tissue As and Si concentrations and selected biochemical aspects of the stress response mechanisms to identify a set of relevant stress response descriptors. This resulted in the recognition of strong cultivar and temporal effects on metabolic and biochemical stress parameters following the treatments. In this paper the metabolic changes in H2O2 content, lipid peroxidation, lycopene and carotenoids content, ascorbate and GSH redox state, total phenolics, ABTS and DPPH radicals inhibition were in favor of an oxidative stress. The significance of some of these parameters as reliable arsenic exposition biomarkers is discussed in the context of the limited knowledge on the As-induced stress response mechanisms at the level of the ripening fruit which presents a distinctive molecular background dissimilar from roots and shoots.Entities:
Keywords: Solanum lycopersicum L.; arsenic stress; multivariate analysis; oxidative stress; ripening
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312426 PMCID: PMC5744081 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Multivariate analysis of variance analysis of fruits from tomato cultivars Aragon and Gladis.
| IV main effect and interactions | Test statistic | Exact value | H. df | E. df | Signif. | Effect size η | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Wilks’s Λ | 0.007 | 265.981 | 11.000 | 21.000 | ∗∗∗ | 99.3 |
| Pillai’s V | 0.993 | 265.981 | 11.000 | 21.000 | ∗∗∗ | 99.3 | |
| Treatment | Wilks’s Λ | 0.001 | 62.080 | 22.000 | 42.000 | ∗∗∗ | 97.0 |
| Pillai’s V | 1.924 | 50.668 | 22.000 | 44.000 | ∗∗∗ | 96.2 | |
| Time | Wilks’s Λ | 0.000 | 253.134 | 22.000 | 42.000 | ∗∗∗ | 99.3 |
| Pillai’s V | 1.983 | 236.519 | 22.000 | 44.000 | ∗∗∗ | 99.2 | |
| Cultivar ∗ Treatment | Wilks’s Λ | 0.002 | 39.706 | 22.000 | 42.000 | ∗∗∗ | 95.4 |
| Pillai’s V | 1.898 | 37.264 | 22.000 | 44.000 | ∗∗∗ | 94.9 | |
| Cultivar ∗ Time | Wilks’s Λ | 0.003 | 34.482 | 22.000 | 42.000 | ∗∗∗ | 94.8 |
| Pillai’s V | 1.465 | 5.477 | 22.000 | 44.000 | ∗∗∗ | 73.3 | |
| Treatment ∗ Time | Wilks’s Λ | 0.000 | 40.881 | 44.000 | 82.295 | ∗∗∗ | 95.0 |
| Pillai’s V | 3.662 | 23.666 | 44.000 | 96.000 | ∗∗∗ | 91.6 | |
| Cultivar ∗ Treatment ∗ Time | Wilks’s Λ | 0.000 | 31.376 | 44.000 | 82.295 | ∗∗∗ | 93.6 |
| Pillai’s V | 3.644 | 22.341 | 44.000 | 96.000 | ∗∗∗ | 91.1 | |