| Literature DB >> 29312131 |
Chiara La Morgia1,2, Lidia Di Vito1, Valerio Carelli1,2, Michele Carbonelli1.
Abstract
Many neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), are characterized by loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as part of the neurodegenerative process. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies demonstrated variable degree of optic atrophy in these diseases. However, the pattern of degenerative changes affecting the optic nerve (ON) can be different. In particular, neurodegeneration is more evident for magnocellular RGCs in AD and multiple system atrophy with a pattern resembling glaucoma. Conversely, in PD and Huntington's disease, the parvocellular RGCs are more vulnerable. This latter pattern closely resembles that of mitochondrial optic neuropathies, possibly pointing to similar pathogenic mechanisms. In this review, the currently available evidences on OCT findings in these neurodegenerative disorders are summarized with particular emphasis on the different pattern of RGC loss. The ON degeneration could become a validated biomarker of the disease, which may turn useful to follow natural history and possibly assess therapeutic efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Huntington’s disease; Parkinson’s disease; glaucoma; multiple system atrophy; optic nerve; optical coherence tomography; retinal ganglion cells
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312131 PMCID: PMC5744067 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1(A) Distribution of retinal nerve fibers. Cross-sectional arrangement of axons, with deeper fibers originating from peripheral retina running closer to choroid occupying peripheral location in ONH, and superficial fibers originating nearer to the ONH occupy a more central portion of the nerve. (B) Arrangement of nerve fibers in the anterior visual pathway. In the pre-laminar, laminar, and proximal retro-laminar region of the ON, the axons from PMB are arranged temporally in the nerve but along the path to the LGN, they gradually shift centrally. ON, optic nerve; ONH, optic nerve head; PMB, papillomacular bundle; LGN, lateral geniculate nucleus.
OCT results in PD.
| OCT | No. of patients | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inzelberg et al. ( | Zeiss 3000 Stratus | 10 PD | ↓ avg; inf-temp RNFL thickness |
| Yavas et al. ( | Heidelberg Retinal Tomography | 44 PD | ↓ avg; nasal, sup and inf-nas, and inf-temp RNFL thickness |
| Altintas˛ et al. ( | Zeiss 3000 Stratus | 17 PD | ↓ avg; sup and nas RNFL thickness |
| Moschos et al. ( | Zeiss 3000 Stratus | 16 PD | ↓ inf and temp RNFL thickness |
| Garcia-Martin et al. ( | Cirrus and Spectralis | 75 PD | ↓ RNFL thickness in all four quadrants |
| Rohani et al. ( | Topcon 3D OCT | 27 PD | ↓ avg; all quadrants RNFL thickness |
| Kirbas et al. ( | Cirrus | 42 PD | ↓ avg; temp RNFL thickness |
| La Morgia et al. ( | Zeiss 3000 Stratus | 43 PD | ↓ temp RNFL thickness |
| Satue et al. ( | Cirrus and Spectralis | 100 PD | ↓ inf (Cirrus and Spectralis) RNFL thickness |
| Sen et al. ( | Not mentioned in the abstract | 35 PD | ↓ avg RNFL thickness |
| Satue et al. ( | Cirrus and Spectralis | 153 PD | ↓ avg (Cirrus and Spectralis); sup, inf, and temp (Cirrus); sup and inf (Spectralis) RNFL thickness |
| Garcia-Martin et al. ( | Cirrus and Spectralis | 46 PD | ↓ avg (Cirrus and Spectralis); sup, inf, and temp (Cirrus); sup and temp (Spectralis) RNFL thickness |
| Garcia-Martin et al. ( | Spectralis | 129 PD | ↓ avg; nas-inf, temp-inf, and temp-sup RNFL thickness |
| Jiménez et al. ( | Zeiss 3000 Stratus | 52 PD | ↓ avg; all four quadrants RNFL thickness |
| Bayhan et al. ( | SD-OCT (RTVue-100) | 20 PD | ↓ nas RNFL thickness |
| Sari et al. ( | SD-OCT | 54 PD | ↓ inf and temp RNFL thickness |
| Kaur et al. ( | SD-OCT | 20 PD | ↓ avg; sup and temp RNFL thickness |
| Eraslan et al. ( | SD-OCT (RTVue-100) | 25 PD | ↓ avg RNFL thickness |
| Pilat et al. ( | SD-OCT (Copernicus) | 25 PD | ↓ avg; all four quadrants RNFL thickness |
PD, Parkinson’s disease; avg, average; temp, temporal; sup, superior; inf, inferior; nas, nasal; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; SD, spectral domain; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
OCT results in AD.
| OCT | No. of patients | Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | MCI | HC | |||
| Pillai et al. ( | Cirrus 4000 HD | 21 | 20 | 34 | No significant differences |
| La Morgia et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 21 | 74 | ↓ avg; sup RNFL thickness | |
| Salobrar-Garcia et al. ( | OCT1000 Topcon | 23 | 28 | No significant differences | |
| Eraslan et al. ( | RTVue-100 | 18 | 20 | ↓ RNFL thickness and macular GCC thickness | |
| Günes˛ et al. ( | OPKO/OTI SD-OCT | 20 | 20 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness | |
| Liu et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 67 | 26 | 39 | ↓ avg; sup RNFL thickness |
| Oktem et al. ( | Cirrus HDOCT | 35 | 35 | 35 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness |
| Cheung et al. ( | Cirrus HDOCT | 100 | 41 | 123 | ↓ GC-IPL thickness in all macular sectors↓ Superior RNFL thickness |
| Gao et al. ( | Cirrus HDOCT | 25 | 26 | 21 | ↓ avg; sup RNFL thickness↓ Macular volume in AD and MCI |
| Bambo et al. ( | Cirrus HDOCT | 56 | 56 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness | |
| Larrosa et al. ( | Cirrus HDOCT | 151 | 61 | ↓ avg; sup and inf RNFL thickness | |
| Ascaso et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 18 | 21 | 41 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness↓ Macular volume in MCI vs HC |
| Polo et al. ( | Cirrus HDOCT | 70 | 70 | ↓ avg; sup and inf RNFL thickness | |
| Gharbiya et al. ( | Heidelberg Spectralis | 21 | 21 | No differences in RNFL thickness | |
| Kromer et al. ( | Heidelberg Spectralis | 22 | 22 | ↓ nas and sup sectors RNFL thickness | |
| Moreno-Ramos et al. ( | OCT1000 Topcon | 10 | 10 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness | |
| Marziani et al. ( | RTVue-100 | 21 | 21 | ↓ Macular RNFL and macular RNFL + GCL in all sectors | |
| Kirbas et al. ( | OCT1000 Topcon | 40 | 40 | ↓ avg; sup RNFL thickness | |
| Moschos et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 30 | 30 | ↓ avg; sup and inf RNFL thickness | |
| Kesler et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 30 | 24 | 24 | ↓ avg; sup (AD) and inf (MCI) RNFL thickness |
| Lu et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 22 | 22 | ↓ avg; sup and inf RNFL thickness | |
| Paquet et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 26 | 23 | 15 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness |
| Berisha et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 9 | 8 | ↓ RNFL thickness in the superior quadrant | |
| Iseri et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 14 | 15 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness↓ Macular volume | |
| Parisi et al. ( | Stratus OCT | 17 | 14 | ↓ avg RNFL thickness | |
AD, Alzheimer’s disease; avg, average; temp, temporal; sup, superior; inf, inferior; nas, nasal; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; GCC, ganglion cell complex; GCL, ganglion cell layer; OCT, optical coherence tomography; IPL, inner plexiform layer; MCI, mild cognitive impairment.