| Literature DB >> 29311980 |
Merih Cibis1,2, Tomas L Lindahl3, Tino Ebbers1,2, Lars O Karlsson4, Carl-Johan Carlhäll1,2,5.
Abstract
Background: Electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation is followed by a transiently impaired atrial mechanical function, termed atrial stunning. During atrial stunning, a retained risk of left atrial thrombus formation exists, which may be attributed to abnormal left atrial blood flow patterns. 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) enables blood flow assessment from the entire three-dimensional atrial volume throughout the cardiac cycle. We sought to investigate left atrial 4D blood flow patterns and hemostasis during left atrial stunning and after left atrial mechanical function was restored.Entities:
Keywords: 4D flow CMR; atrial fibrillation; atrial stunning; cardioversion; hemostasis; stasis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29311980 PMCID: PMC5732934 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1(A) PC-MRCA of a representative subject and the velocity distribution in a cross-section within the LA (corresponding to a 3-chamber long-axis view) during early diastole at Time-1. (B) Velocity waveform of a voxel (shown in black box in panel A) inside LA. The duration of stasis (Tstasis) is calculated as the longest continuous period with velocities below 15 cm/s normalized by the number of cardiac time frames.
Demographical and basic clinical data in all patients (n = 14).
| Age (years) | 65 ± 9 | ||
| Gender F/M | 1/13 | ||
| Weight (kg) | 95 ± 14 | ||
| Heart rate (bpm) | 61 ± 7 | 56 ± 8 | 0.01 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | |||
| Systolic | 137 ± 17 | 149 ± 20 | 0.06 |
| Diastolic | 88 ± 13 | 86 ± 12 | 0.38 |
| LV end diastolic volume (mL) | 186 ± 34 | 193 ± 38 | 0.28 |
| LV end systolic volume (mL) | 88 ± 23 | 76 ± 17 | 0.005 |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 53 ± 7 | 60 ± 5 | <0.001 |
| LA max/min size | 1.1± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 0.002 |
| LA ΔVolumemax (%) | 8 ± 4% | 22 ± 15 | 0.009 |
| Medication | |||
| Beta blockers | 14 | ||
| ACE-inhibitors or ARB | 9 | ||
| Calcium antagonist | 7 | ||
| Diuretics | 4 | ||
| Lipid-lowering drugs | 5 | ||
| Anticoagulant Warfarin/NOAC | 5/9 |
LV, left ventricle; LA, left atrium; ΔVolume.
Figure 2(A) Mean velocity (Vmean) and (B) peak velocity (Vpeak) (C) mean vorticity of LA (ωmean) and (D) near wall vorticity (ωwall) at early and late diastole during Time-1 and Time-2. ** Shows that p < 0.005.
Figure 3(A) The duration of stasis as a percentage of the cardiac cycle (Tstasis) and (B) the volume of stasis (Volumestasis) as a percentage of LA volume during Time-1 and Time-2. ** Shows that p < 0.005 and * shows that p < 0.05.
The markers of hemostasis at Time-1 and Time-2.
| TAT (μg/L) | 5.2 ± 3.3 | 3.3 ± 2.2 | 0.008 |
| Human sP-selectin/CD62P (ng/mL) | 23.3 ± 5.5 | 24.7 ± 4.8 | 0.57 |
| D-dimer (mg/L) | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 1.00 |
| vWF (IU/mL) | 1.24 ± 0.35 | 1.27 ± 0.40 | 0.69 |
Figure 4(A) The linear regression analysis between TAT and volume of stasis (Volumestasis) as a percentage of the LA volume at Time-1 (red) and Time-2 (black). (B) The linear regression analysis between TAT and duration of stasis (Tstasis) as a percentage of the cardiac cycle at Time-1 (red) and Time-2 (black).