| Literature DB >> 29311439 |
Eman A Salem1, Sabah M Ebrahem2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Work stress among nurses has increased in recent years due to the demands of clinical nursing.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; ERI; MDA; Nurses; Work Stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29311439 PMCID: PMC5886886 DOI: 10.1539/joh.17-0186-OA
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Health ISSN: 1341-9145 Impact factor: 2.708
ERI and overcommitment in relation to characteristics of the studied participants
| Characteristics | Total(n=204) No (%) | ERI | Overcommitment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1(n=56) No (%) | >1(n=148) No (%) | *P value | Low(n=140) No (%) | High(n=64) No (%) | *P value | ||
| *p value for χ2 test | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 20-30 | 112 (54.9) | 24 (42.9) | 88 (59.5) | <0.001 | 76 (54.3) | 36 (56.2) | 0.846 |
| >30-40 | 76 (37.3) | 32 (57.1) | 44 (29.7) | 52 (37.1) | 24 (37.5) | ||
| >40 | 16 (7.8) | 0 | 16 (10.8) | 12 (8.6) | 4 (6.2) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Females | 192 (94.1) | 56 (100.0) | 136 (94.1) | 0.028 | 132 (94.3) | 60 (93.8) | 0.880 |
| Males | 12 (5.9) | 0 | 12 (8.1) | 8 (5.7) | 4 (6.2) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Secondary school | 76 (37.3) | 20 (35.7) | 56 (37.8) | 0.313 | 52 (37.1) | 24 (37.5) | 0.630 |
| University | 72 (35.3) | 24 (42.9) | 48 (32.4) | 52 (37.1) | 20 (31.2) | ||
| Technical Institute of nursing | 56 (27.5) | 12 (21.4) | 44 (29.7) | 36 (25.7) | 20 (31.2) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Single | 188 (92.2) | 8 (14.3) | 8 (5.4) | 0.035 | 12 (8.6) | 4 (6.2) | 0.567 |
| Married | 16 (7.8) | 48 (85.7) | 140 (94.6) | 128 (91.4) | 60 (93.8) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Nurse | 136 (66.7) | 32 (57.1) | 104 (70.3) | 0.076 | 88 (66.7) | 48 (75.0) | 0.088 |
| Supervisor | 68 (33.3) | 24 (42.9) | 44 (29.7) | 68 (33.3) | 16 (25.0) | ||
|
| |||||||
| ICUs | 76 (37.3) | 12 (21.4) | 64 (43.2) | <0.001 | 56 (40.0) | 20 (31.2) | <0.001 |
| Operating rooms | 60 (29.4) | 12 (21.4) | 48 (32.4) | 20 (14.3) | 40 (62.5) | ||
| Other departments | 68 (33.4) | 32 (57.2) | 36 (24.4) | 60 (42.9) | 4 (6.2) | ||
|
| |||||||
| < 5 | 72 (35.3) | 20 (35.7) | 52 (35.1) | 0.026 | 48 (34.3) | 24 (37.5) | 0.427 |
| 5-10 | 36 (17.6) | 16 (28.6) | 20 (13.5) | 28 (20.0) | 8 (12.5) | ||
| >10 | 96 (47.1) | 20 (35.7) | 76 (51.4) | 64 (45.7) | 32 (50.0) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Day shift | 68 (33.3) | 20 (35.7) | 48 (32.4) | 0.657 | 48 (34.3) | 20 (31.2) | 0.670 |
| Rotating shift | 136 (66.7) | 36 (64.3) | 100 (67.6) | 92 (65.7) | 44 (68.8) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.59±0.33 | 0.52±0.21 | 0.62±0.36 | 0.014** | 0.57±0.34 | 0.64±0.30 | 0.440** |
|
| |||||||
| Mean ± SD | 3.20±2.21 | 3.10±1.75 | 3.23±2.36 | 0.691** | 2.12±1.41 | 3.60±2.32 | <0.001** |
Fig. 1.Correlation between E/R ratio with total antioxidant levels in the studied participants
rho= 0.01 P=0.866
Binary logistic regression analysis for covariates of ERI in the studied participants
| OR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted for age, gender, education levels, job titles, years of experience and shift work OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. | ||
|
| ||
| 20-30 | 1.34 (0.84-2.14) | 0.607 |
| >30-40 | 0.91 (0.53-1.67) | 0.998 |
| >40 | 1.00 (reference) | |
|
| ||
| Females | 0.88 (0.55-1.42) | 0.995 |
| Males | 1.00 (reference) | |
|
| ||
| Secondary school | 0.31 (0.070-1.370) | 0.123 |
| University | 0.94 (0.097-3.036) | 0.956 |
| Technical Institute of nursing | 1.00 (reference) | |
|
| ||
| Single | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Married | 8.09 (1.645-39.782) | 0.031 |
|
| ||
| Nurse | 1.84 (0.195-2.357) | 0.595 |
| Supervisor | 1.00 (reference) | |
|
| ||
| Other departments | 1.00 (reference) | |
| ICUs | 13.34 (3.821-46.589) | <0.001 |
| Operating rooms | 37.27 (8.172-169.967) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
| < 5 | 1.00 (reference) | |
| 5-10 | 1.29 (0.244-6.790) | 0.767 |
| >10 | 1.17 (0.638-2.115) | 0.997 |
|
| ||
| Day shift | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Rotating shift | 0.82 (0.274-2.440) | 0.718 |
MDA levels in relation to characteristics of the studied participants
| Characteristics | MDA levels (umol/ | Test of significance | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 20-30 | 2.76 ±1.87 | Kruskall-Wallis test=9.36 | 0.009 |
| >30-40 | 3.88 ±2.64 | ||
| >40 | 3.06 ±0.92 | ||
|
| |||
| Females | 3.09 ±2.13 | Mann-Whitney test=1.50 | 0.133 |
| Males | 7.78 ±2.90 | ||
|
| |||
| Secondary school | 3.47±2.71 | Kruskall-Wallis test=0.121 | 0.941 |
| University | 3.01±1.96 | ||
| Technical Institute of nursing | 3.10±1.79 | ||
|
| |||
| Single | 3.47 ±1.44 | Mann-Whitney test=1.43 | 0.153 |
| Married | 3.18 ±2.27 | ||
|
| |||
| Nurse | 3.26 ±2.36 | Mann-Whitney test=0.11 | 0.912 |
| Supervisor | 3.07 ±1.88 | ||
|
| |||
| ICUs | 3.03 ±1.47 | Kruskall-Wallis test=10.24 | 0.006 |
| Operating rooms Other | 4.23 ±3.18 | ||
| departments | 2.59 ±1.64 | ||
|
| |||
| < 5 | 2.98 ±1.99 | Kruskall-Wallis test=1.12 | 0.570 |
| 5-10 | 2.97 ±1.94 | ||
| >10 | 3.47 ±2.46 | ||
|
| |||
| Day shift | 3.30 ±2.45 | Mann-Whitney test=0.20 | 0.843 |
| Rotating shift | 3.15 ±2.09 |
Fig. 2.Correlation between MDA levels and E/R ratios in the studied participants with ERI.
rho= 0.350 P=< 0.001