Literature DB >> 29311417

Theoretical and experimental comparison of proton and helium-beam radiography using silicon pixel detectors.

T Gehrke1, C Amato, S Berke, M Martišíková.   

Abstract

Ion-beam radiography (iRad) could potentially improve the quality control of ion-beam therapy. The main advantage of iRad is the possibility to directly measure the integrated stopping power. Until now there is no clinical implementation of iRad. Topics of ongoing research include developing dedicated detection systems to achieve the desired spatial resolution (SR) and investigating different ion types as imaging radiation. This work focuses on the theoretical and experimental comparison of proton (pRad) and helium-beam radiography (αRad). The experimental comparison was performed with an in-house developed detection system consisting of silicon pixel detectors. This system enables the measurement of energy deposition of single ions, their tracking, and the identification of the ion type, which is important for αRad due to secondary fragments. A 161 mm-thick PMMA phantom with an air gap of 1 mm placed at different depths was imaged with a 168 MeV u-1 proton/helium-ion beam at the Heidelberg ion-beam therapy center. The image quality in terms of SR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated. After validating MC simulations against experiments, pRad and αRad were compared to carbon-beam radiography (cRad) in simulations. The theoretical prediction that the CNR of pRad and αRad is equal at similar imaging doses was experimentally confirmed. The measured SR of αRad was 55% better compared to pRad. The simulated cRads showed the expected improvement in SR and the decreased CNR at the same dose compared to the αRads, however only at dose levels exceeding typical doses of diagnostic x-ray projections. For clinically applicable dose levels, the cRads suffered from an insufficient number of carbon ions per pixel (220 μm  ×  220 μm). In conclusion, it was theoretically and experimentally shown that αRad provides a better SR than pRad without any disadvantages concerning the CNR. Using carbon ions instead of helium ions leads to a better SR at the cost of higher doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29311417     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa60f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.

Authors:  L Volz; C-A Collins-Fekete; E Bär; S Brons; C Graeff; R P Johnson; A Runz; C Sarosiek; R W Schulte; J Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The impact of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium ion imaging.

Authors:  Lennart Volz; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Vladimir A Bashkirov; Stephan Brons; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Robert P Johnson; Reinhard W Schulte; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Helium ion beam imaging for image guided ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Martišíková; T Gehrke; S Berke; G Aricò; O Jäkel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.