Literature DB >> 29311149

Estimating Barriers to Gene Flow from Distorted Isolation-by-Distance Patterns.

Harald Ringbauer1, Alexander Kolesnikov2, David L Field3, Nicholas H Barton2.   

Abstract

In continuous populations with local migration, nearby pairs of individuals have on average more similar genotypes than geographically well-separated pairs. A barrier to gene flow distorts this classical pattern of isolation by distance. Genetic similarity is decreased for sample pairs on different sides of the barrier and increased for pairs on the same side near the barrier. Here, we introduce an inference scheme that uses this signal to detect and estimate the strength of a linear barrier to gene flow in two dimensions. We use a diffusion approximation to model the effects of a barrier on the geographic spread of ancestry backward in time. This approach allows us to calculate the chance of recent coalescence and probability of identity by descent. We introduce an inference scheme that fits these theoretical results to the geographic covariance structure of bialleleic genetic markers. It can estimate the strength of the barrier as well as several demographic parameters. We investigate the power of our inference scheme to detect barriers by applying it to a wide range of simulated data. We also showcase an example application to an Antirrhinum majus (snapdragon) flower-color hybrid zone, where we do not detect any signal of a strong genome-wide barrier to gene flow.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers to gene flow; demographic inference; identity by descent; isolation by distance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29311149      PMCID: PMC5844333          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  The influence of spatial inhomogeneities on neutral models of geographical variation IV. Discontinuities in the population density and migration rate.

Authors:  B P Ayati; T F Dupont; T Nagylaki
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 2.  Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?

Authors:  F Rousset
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The genetical bandwidth mapping: a spatial and graphical representation of population genetic structure based on the Wombling method.

Authors:  A Cercueil; O François; S Manel
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Differential systematics.

Authors:  W H WOMBLE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1951-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The trouble with isolation by distance.

Authors:  Patrick G Meirmans
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  A computer program to simulate multilocus genotype data with spatially autocorrelated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Gilles Guillot; Filipe Santos
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Exploring diffusion across permeable barriers at high gradients. I. Narrow pulse approximation.

Authors:  Denis S Grebenkov; Dang Van Nguyen; Jing-Rebecca Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Disentangling the effects of geographic and ecological isolation on genetic differentiation.

Authors:  Gideon S Bradburd; Peter L Ralph; Graham M Coop
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Deconstructing isolation-by-distance: The genomic consequences of limited dispersal.

Authors:  Stepfanie M Aguillon; John W Fitzpatrick; Reed Bowman; Stephan J Schoech; Andrew G Clark; Graham Coop; Nancy Chen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of fine-scale population structure on the distribution of heterozygosity in a long-term study of Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  Parvathy Surendranadh; Louise Arathoon; Carina A Baskett; David L Field; Melinda Pickup; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Fast and flexible estimation of effective migration surfaces.

Authors:  Joseph Marcus; Wooseok Ha; Rina Foygel Barber; John Novembre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Inferring Continuous and Discrete Population Genetic Structure Across Space.

Authors:  Gideon S Bradburd; Graham M Coop; Peter L Ralph
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Testing the Effect of Mountain Ranges as a Physical Barrier to Current Gene Flow and Environmentally Dependent Adaptive Divergence in Cunninghamia konishii (Cupressaceae).

Authors:  Yi-Shao Li; Kai-Ming Shih; Chung-Te Chang; Jeng-Der Chung; Shih-Ying Hwang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Detecting geospatial patterns of Plasmodium falciparum parasite migration in Cambodia using optimized estimated effective migration surfaces.

Authors:  Yao Li; Amol C Shetty; Chanthap Lon; Michele Spring; David L Saunders; Mark M Fukuda; Tran Tinh Hien; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; Rick M Fairhurst; Arjen M Dondorp; Christopher V Plowe; Timothy D O'Connor; Shannon Takala-Harrison; Kathleen Stewart
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  Genetic Landscapes Reveal How Human Genetic Diversity Aligns with Geography.

Authors:  Benjamin M Peter; Desislava Petkova; John Novembre
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Detecting steps in spatial genetic data: Which diversity measures are best?

Authors:  Alexander T Sentinella; Angela T Moles; Jason G Bragg; Maurizio Rossetto; William B Sherwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can secondary contact following range expansion be distinguished from barriers to gene flow?

Authors:  Johanna Bertl; Harald Ringbauer; Michael G B Blum
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Potential adaptive divergence between subspecies and populations of snapdragon plants inferred from QST -FST comparisons.

Authors:  Sara Marin; Anaïs Gibert; Juliette Archambeau; Vincent Bonhomme; Mylène Lascoste; Benoit Pujol
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 6.185

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.