| Literature DB >> 29310595 |
Leonar Arroyo1, Diana Marín2, Kees L M C Franken3, Tom H M Ottenhoff3, Luis F Barrera4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the most deadly infectious diseases. One-third to one-fourth of the human population is estimated to be infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) without showing clinical symptoms, a condition called latent TB infection (LTBI). Diagnosis of Mtb infection is based on the immune response to a mixture of mycobacterial antigens (PPD) or to Mtb specific ESAT-6/CFP10 antigens (IGRA), highly expressed during the initial phase of infection. However, the immune response to PPD and IGRA antigens has a low power to discriminate between LTBI and PTB. The T-cell response to a group of so-called latency (DosR-regulon-encoded) and Resuscitation Promoting (Rpf) antigens of Mtb has been proved to be significantly higher in LTBI compared to active TB across many populations, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers to differentiate latent from active TB.Entities:
Keywords: DosR; IFNγ biomarkers; Latency; Rpf; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29310595 PMCID: PMC5759254 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2929-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Comparison of the IFNγ levels in LTBI and PTB in response to RD-1 Esat6-Cfp10 (E6-C10), DosR and Rpf antigens. PBMCs (1 × 105) were cultured for 7 days, in the presence or absence of PPD, E6-C10 and the DosR and Rpf antigens. IFNγ levels in LTBI (orange circles) and PTB (blue circles) were determined by Luminex. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to calculate statistical differences between groups and p-values are shown in the graphs (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001)
Abilities of the IFNγ in response to PPD, E6-C10, DosR and Rpf antigens to discriminate between LTBI and PTB
| Antigens | PTB Median (IQR) | HHC-LTBI Median (IQR) | AUC (95% CI) | Cut-off (pg/ml) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DosR | |||||||
| Rv1737c | 70.7 (18.8–664.2) | 1742.0 (209.2–2528.0) | 0.0041 | 0.76 (0.60–0.92) | 1014.96 | 65.0 | 90.5 |
| Rv2029c | 233.4 (38.9–961.3) | 2421.0 (1182.0–4426.0) | 0.0003 | 0.82 (0.69–0.96) | 763.15 | 90.0 | 76.2 |
| Rv2628 | 452.3 (29.1–1363.0) | 2489.0 (281.0–7006.0) | 0.0173 | 0.72 (0.55–0.88) | 1569.41 | 65.0 | 81.0 |
| Rpf | |||||||
| Rv0867c | 121.8 (19.3–437.2) | 576.8 (181.0–1224.0) | 0.0091 | 0.74 (0.58–0.89) | 454.89 | 65.0 | 81.0 |
| Rv2389c | 15.5 (6.3–200.3) | 349.5 (74.72–932.6) | 0.0126 | 0.73 (0.57–0.89) | 28.36 | 85.0 | 61.9 |
| Control | |||||||
| E6-C10 | 56.5 (2.4–1027.0) | 2623.0 (461.0–6761.0) | 0.0006 | 0.80 (0.66–0.94) | 1070.36 | 75.0 | 81.0 |
| PPD | 2355.0 (401.3–3949.0) | 5453.0 (2137.0–18,874.0) | 0.0042 | 0.76 (0.60–0.91) | 4464.11 | 65.0 | 86.0 |
IQR Interquartile Range. AUC Area Under the ROC Curve. CI Confidence Interval
*p-value for the Mann-Whitney test
Fig. 2Multiple correspondence analysis for the IFNγ levels in response to RD-1 Esat6-Cfp10 (E6-C10), DosR and Rpf antigens in LTBI and PTB
Fig. 3Decision-tree diagram based on CHAID analysis, showing the antigens that better influence the prediction of being LTBI or PTB
Capacity of PPD, E6C10, DosR and Rpf antigens to discriminate between LTBI and PTB
| Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Bootstrapa | |||||
| SE | Sig. (bilateral) | CI (95%) | ||||
| Inferior | Superior | |||||
| Step 1 | PPD | 0.424 | 34.863b | 0.139b | −42.725 | 76.794 |
| E6C10 | 1.899 | 43.275b | 0.025b | −62.260 | 119.469 | |
| Rv1737c | 0.478 | 30.405b | 0.152b | −41.714 | 76.074 | |
| Rv2029c | 2.454 | 40.806b | 0.038b | −39.811 | 151.793 | |
| Rv2628 | 0.138 | 32.905b | 0.253b | −77.272 | 41.945 | |
| Rv0867c | 1.860 | 35.250b | 0.025b | −36.482 | 107.89 | |
| Rv2389c | −1.865 | 39.777b | 0.025b | −132.135 | 73.181 | |
| Constant | −2.354 | 31.571b | 0.127b | −95.683 | −0.056 | |
aBoostrap results based on 100 bootstrap samples, bBased on 78 samples; SE Standard Error, CI Confidence Interval, Sig Significance