Literature DB >> 29310581

Application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by avian influenza A (H7N9) viral pneumonia: national data from the Chinese multicentre collaboration.

Linna Huang1, Wei Zhang2, Yi Yang3, Wenjuan Wu4, Weihua Lu5, Han Xue6, Hongsheng Zhao7, Yunfu Wu8, Jia Shang9, Lihua Cai10, Long Liu11, Donglin Liu1, Yeming Wang1, Bin Cao12, Qingyuan Zhan13, Chen Wang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); Avian influenza A (H7N9); Complications; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29310581      PMCID: PMC5759204          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2903-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

Avian influenza A (H7N9) viral pneumonia can manifest with varying degrees of dyspnea and is associated with a mortality of ~30% [1]. In particular, 97% of patients develop rapidly progressive pneumonia and 71% progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The mortality of severe ARDS is as high as 62% [2]. Timely and effective respiratory support is particularly important to treat severe ARDS caused by avian influenza A (H7N9) pneumonia. However, severe ARDS induced by avian influenza A (H7N9) pneumonia might manifest as refractory hypoxaemia even with appropriate invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) support. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the ultimate respiratory support method and directly improves the oxygenation and ventilation of patients as well as enables implementation of the “lung protective ventilation strategy” [3]. ECMO was the breakthrough treatment for the severe avian influenza A (H1N1) outbreak of 2009 and reduced mortality from this outbreak [4-6]. Therefore, we believe that ECMO could also be effective for other types of severe viral pneumonia. Existing studies of ECMO treatment for avian influenza A (H7N9) pneumonia are primarily limited to case reports [7-9], and no study has systematically reviewed the efficacy or safety of ECMO to treat such diseases. Therefore, it is particularly important to understand the current application of ECMO for avian influenza A (H7N9) pneumonia-induced severe ARDS, investigate the application timing and management strategies of ECMO, and explore the possible reasons for treatment failure. Based on the current study, we expect to standardize the management of ECMO and provide a description of our experiences using ECMO to treat patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) pneumonia-induced severe ARDS.

Methods

Study population and data collection

Patients who had laboratory-confirmed avian influenza A (H7N9) virus-induced pneumonia were included in this study. Patients were admitted to 20 hospitals in 9 provinces of China between October 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017, and were reported to the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China. We included patients aged >14 ys who were supported by ECMO. Patients who were lacking key detailed records of parameters during ECMO, such as ventilator or laboratory findings, were excluded. The included patients were divided into 2 groups, namely, the “successfully weaned group” and “unsuccessfully weaned group”. The former refers to a group of patients whose condition improved and were weaned from ECMO for at least 48 h; the “unsuccessfully weaned group” refers to those who died or voluntarily discontinued treatment due to lack of improvement during ECMO support.

General conditions

The general conditions included age, gender, pregnancy status, underlying disease, time from onset to antiviral drug administration, vasoactive drug administration pre-ECMO, duration of IPPV pre-ECMO, whether rescue ventilation strategies (including lung recruitment maneuvre, prone-position ventilation, and high-frequency oscillation ventilation) were implemented pre-ECMO, disease severity score, total duration of ECMO and IPPV.

Conditions during ECMO

We collected the ECMO blood flow at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h on ECMO. Improvement in circulatory and respiratory physiological indicators were considered, as well as IPPV parameters at 6 h pre-ECMO and 24, 48, and 72 h on ECMO. Furthermore, anticoagulation indicators during ECMO, including the types of anticoagulant drugs and methods of use; the maximum and minimum values of the activated coagulation time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT); and the differences between the maximum and minimum ACT and APTT at 24, 48, and 72 h on ECMO were recorded. Finally, data regarding complications during ECMO therapy, including ECMO and IPPV-related complications and nosocomial infections, were collected.

Study definitions and design

Outcomes

The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of hospitalization.

Definition of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus infection

Three methods were used for a laboratory diagnosis, namely, the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), viral isolation, and serological testing for the avian influenza A (H7N9) virus using a modified haemagglutinin inhibition assay [10-12].

Definition of acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS)

We defined ARDS according to the Berlin definition in 2012 [13, 14].

Definitions of pneumonia and severe pneumonia

Pneumonia was diagnosed as an acute illness with fever, cough, or dyspnea/tachypnea, and at least one new focal chest sign that was supported by a finding of lung shadowing on a chest radiograph and without other non-infectious causes. The primary criteria for severe pneumonia were as follows: <1 > need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) and <2 > need for vasoactive drugs after the active fluid resuscitation due to septic shock. The secondary criteria were as follows: <1 > respiratory rate ≥ 30 times/min; <2 > PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 250 mmHg; <3 > multiple lobe infiltration; <4 > disturbances of consciousness, disorientation, or both; <5 > blood urea nitrogen ≥ 7.14 mmol/L; and <6 > systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg that required active fluid resuscitation. Patients who met one primary criterion or at least three secondary criteria were diagnosed as having severe pneumonia [15].

Definitions of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)

The criteria for the diagnosis of VAP are in accordance with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [16] and included the following: <1 > two or more sequential chest x-rays or CT scans with a suggestive image of pneumonia for patients with underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease, or one definitive chest x-ray or CT scan in patients without underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease; <2 > a fever greater than 38 °C and/or leukocytosis greater than or equal to 12,000 WBC/mm3 or leukopenia less than or equal to 4000 WBC/mm3; and <3 > at least one of the following:  new onset of purulent sputum or change in the characteristics of the sputum; cough, dyspnea, or tachycardia;  auscultatory findings, such as rales, bronchial breath sounds, ronchi, or wheezing; or  worsening gas exchange (e.g., oxygen desaturation or increased oxygen requirements or increased ventilation demand). For all included patients, we first described the general conditions, ECMO model and parameters, IPPV parameters, the changes in circulation and respiratory physiological indicators from pre-ECMO to on ECMO status, anticoagulation on ECMO, and complications during ECMO therapy in all included patients. Then, we compared patients who were successfully or unsuccessfully weaned from ECMO with regard to above items.

Statistical analysis

All of the analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software. Normally distributed continuous variables are expressed as the means ± SD and were compared using the t-test or chi-square test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables are expressed as medians and quartiles and were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were compared using the x2 test. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

A total of 473 patients were diagnosed with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus-related pneumonia. Patients were admitted to 20 hospitals in 9 provinces of China between October 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017, and were reported to the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China. The medical records of 216 patients were available, and 36 patients were reported to be supported by ECMO. One of the 36 patients lacked IPPV and ECMO parameters pre-ECMO and on ECMO and was eliminated as a participant; therefore, 35 patients were ultimately selected (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flowchart. A flowchart illustrating the enrolment of patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus-induced pneumonia who were reported to the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China; patients were admitted to 20 hospitals in 9 provinces of China between October 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017

Flowchart. A flowchart illustrating the enrolment of patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus-induced pneumonia who were reported to the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China; patients were admitted to 20 hospitals in 9 provinces of China between October 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017

General conditions and outcomes

Data from 35 patients (65.7% males), with an average age of 57 ± 1 years, were analysed. There was no patient under the age of 16. A total of 22 patients had underlying diseases, 8 patients were treated with steroids and immunosuppressive agents within 1 month of admission to the hospital, and 1 patient was pregnant. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 9 ± 3 points, and the Murray score was 3.6 ± 0.4 points. The time from onset to antiviral drug administration was approximately 9 ± 5 d, and the time from onset to ECMO support was approximately 10 ± 3 d. High-dose vasoactive drugs [17] were needed to maintain blood pressure in 20 patients (57.1%). The duration of IPPV pre-ECMO was approximately 5 ± 1 d. Rescue ventilation strategies, including the recruitment manoeuvre (RM), prone-position ventilation (PP) and high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), were needed for 23 patients (65.7%) pre-ECMO. The total durations of IPPV and ECMO were approximately 20 ± 8 d and 8 d (5–13 d), respectively. Of the 35 patients, 14 (40%) were successfully weaned from ECMO, and the other 21 patients died due to an uncontrolled haemorrhage (5 patients), septic shock (6 patients due to progressive lung infection, 3 patients due to bloodstream infection), heart failure (2 patients) and discontinuation of treatment because of no improvement (5 patients). One of 14 patients showed an aggregated lung infection after weaning and eventually died due to septic shock. The in-hospital mortality was 63%. The length of ICU stay was 27 ± 14 d, and the total length of hospitalization was 31 ± 14 d (Table 1).
Table 1

General conditions and outcomes of patients with ECMO therapy

VariableTotal (n = 35)Successfully weaned group (n = 14)Unsuccessfully weaned group (n = 21)P value
Gender, number (%)
 Male23(65.7)9(64.3)14(66.7)1.00
Age, years, mean ± SD57 ± 151 ± 1060 ± 120.02*
Underlying Diseases, number (%)
 Hypertension19(54.3)7(50)12(57.1)0.74
 Diabetes13(37.1)1(7.1)12(57.1)< 0.01*
 Cerebrovascular disease5(14.3)3(21.4)2(9.5)0.37
 History of steroid and immunosuppressant within 1 month8(22.9)4(28.6)4(19.0)0.69
Pregnancy, number (%)1(2.9)0(0.0)1(47.6)1.00
Onset to NAI9 ± 57 ± 311 ± 60.04*
Onset to ECMO10 ± 310 ± 310 ± 30.97
Organ support pre-ECMO
 High-dose vasoactive drugsa, number (%)20(57.1)6(42.9)14(63.6)0.31
 Rescue ventilation strategiesb, number (%)23(65.7)6(43.9)17(81.0)0.03*
 Duration of IPPV, days, mean ± SD5 ± 12 ± 16 ± 4< 0.01*
SOFA Score9 ± 37 ± 210 ± 40.02*
Murray Score3.6 ± 0.43.6 ± 0.53.6 ± 0.40.95
PaO2/FiO2 pre-ECMO, mmHg, mean ± SD78 ± 2389 ± 2471 ± 200.04*
Duration of ECMO, days, median (IQR)8(5–13)10(7–13)7(3–16)0.48
Total Duration of IPPV, days, mean ± SD20 ± 823 ± 1318 ± 150.36
Clinical outcomes
 Mortality, number (%)22 (63)1 (7.1)21 (100)< 0.01*
 Length of stay in ICU, days, mean ± SD27 ± 1433 ± 1224 ± 140.081
 Length of hospitalization, days, mean ± SD31 ± 1439 ± 1027 ± 140.010*

Note: ahigh-dose vasoactive drugs [17] infer to: noradrenaline > 0.5 μg/kg/min or dopamine > 20 μg/kg/min; brescue ventilation strategies includes recruitment maneuver (RM), prone position ventilation (PP) and high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)

NAI neuraminidase inhibitors, IPPV invasive positive pressure ventilation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, SOFA score sequential organ failure score, ICU intensive care unit

We made comparison between successfully weaned and unsuccessfully weaned group using t-test, x2 test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and P values <0.05 were considered significant, marked as *

General conditions and outcomes of patients with ECMO therapy Note: ahigh-dose vasoactive drugs [17] infer to: noradrenaline > 0.5 μg/kg/min or dopamine > 20 μg/kg/min; brescue ventilation strategies includes recruitment maneuver (RM), prone position ventilation (PP) and high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) NAI neuraminidase inhibitors, IPPV invasive positive pressure ventilation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, SOFA score sequential organ failure score, ICU intensive care unit We made comparison between successfully weaned and unsuccessfully weaned group using t-test, x2 test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and P values <0.05 were considered significant, marked as *

Conditions during ECMO

ECMO mode and information concerning the equipment

Of the 35 patients, 33 were treated using the veno-venous ECMO (V-V ECMO) model. A total of 2 patients with severe cardiac insufficiency and cardiogenic shock were treated using the venous-arterial ECMO (V-A ECMO) model. The ECMO equipment was mainly provided by MAQUET (Shanghai) Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. and SORIN (Shanghai) Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. The pump from SORIN was the Stockert Centrifugal Pump System (SCP/SCPC), and the oxygenator was the D905 EOS ECMO. The pump from MAQUET was the ROTAFLOW, and the oxygenator was the QUADROX PLS.

ECMO management

Changes in IPPV parameters and physiological indicators in patients on ECMO

The ventilator parameters, including FiO2, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pplat, and VT, were significantly decreased in patients on ECMO. The vital signs, which included the heart rate, respiratory rate, and SpO2, and the arterial blood gas analysis (ABG), which included the pH, PaCO2, and PaO2 levels, were improved in patients after ECMO support (Table 2).
Table 2

Parameters on ECMO, IPPV parameters and physiological indicators pre and on ECMO

Variable6 h pre-ECMO24 h on ECMO48 h on ECMO72 h on ECMOP value
Blood flow (L/min)3.84 ± 0.874.48 ± 0.774.18 ± 1.000.023*
IPPV parameters
 FiO294 (55–100)50 (40–80)45 (40–60)46 (40–50)<0.001*
 PEEP (cmH2O)14 ± 412 ± 511 ± 311 ± 20.022*
 VT (ml)439 ± 61285 ± 94317 ± 103308 ± 128<0.001*
 Pplat (cmH2O)29 ± 823 ± 623 ± 524 ± 70.004*
Physiological indicators
 Heart Rate (/min)103 ± 2790 ± 2485 ± 2290 ± 250.025*
 MAP (mmHg)84 ± 1587 ± 1581 ± 2194 ± 170.057
 Respiratory Rate (/min)31 ± 719 ± 616 ± 616 ± 6<0.001*
 pH7.33 ± 0.107.42 ± 0.107.39 ± 0.107.43 ± 0.100.006*
 PaCO2 (mmHg)52.4 ± 16.634.1 ± 9.838.3 ± 10.538.2 ± 7.8<0.001*
 PaO2 (mmHg)56.3 ± 20.990.0 ± 35.994.8 ± 45.7104.4 ± 57.5<0.001*
 Lactate (mmol/L)2.8 ± 1.93.1 ± 3.74.0 ± 4.82.9 ± 2.70.625

Note: ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, IPPV invasive positive pressure ventilation, FiO fraction of inspiration, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, VT tidal volume, P plateau pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, SpO fingertip pulse oxygen saturation, PaCO partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, PaO partial pressure of arterial oxygen

*P < 0.05

Parameters on ECMO, IPPV parameters and physiological indicators pre and on ECMO Note: ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, IPPV invasive positive pressure ventilation, FiO fraction of inspiration, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, VT tidal volume, P plateau pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, SpO fingertip pulse oxygen saturation, PaCO partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, PaO partial pressure of arterial oxygen *P < 0.05

Monitoring of anticoagulation

All 35 patients received a continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation. However, heparin was discontinued for 2 patients with cerebral haemorrhage and 3 with active gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The ACT was 144 ± 61 to 220 ± 66 s at 24 h, 16 ± 37 to 234 ± 37 s at 48 h, and 147 ± 26 to 221 ± 40 s at 72 h on ECMO. The APTT was 58 ± 23 to 84 ± 28 s and 53 ± 15 to 75 ± 23 s at 48 and 72 h on ECMO, respectively.

Complications during ECMO therapy

In this study, the rates of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, cerebral haemorrhage, brain death, renal insufficiency, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hyperglycaemia, and ECMO oxygenator thrombosis were higher compared to the relevant data from the ECLS Registry Report [18, 19]. New cases of VAP developed in 21 patients during ECMO, with an incidence rate of 60%. New cases of barotrauma occurred in 3 patients, accounting for 8.6% of cases. In addition, 6 patients had a urinary infection, with an incidence rate of 17.1%, and 10 patients had a catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI), with an incidence rate of 28.6% (Table 3).
Table 3

Complications During ECMO

ComplicationsOur study (%)ECLS Registry Report (%) [18, 19]
ECMO Mechanical Complications
 Oxygenator failure0.018
 Oxygenator thrombosis14.312
 Other sites thrombosis2.97.7
Hemorrhage45.7
 Gastrointestinal hemorrhage28.64.6
 Cerebral hemorrhage8.64–8
 Other site hemorrhage31.4
Organ Failure
 Brain death8.63.8
 Cerebral infarction2.9
 Epilepsy2.9
 Renal insufficiency48.633.5
 Heart failure62.961.8
 Arrhythmia with unstable hemodynamics5.718.2
 Cardiac arrest11.49.8
 Liver failure25.7
 DIC8.63.8
 Hemolysis2.97.1
 Severe thrombocytopenia11.4
Nosocomial Infection
 CRBSI28.621.2
 Bacteremia of other sources5.7
 VAP60.0
 Urinary infections17.1
Barotrauma8.6
Metabolic
 Hyperbilirubinemia4 (11.4)7.3
 Hyperglycemia17 (48.6)18.2

Note: DIC disseminated intravascular coagulation, CRBSI catheter related bloodstream infection, VAP ventilator associated pneumonia; severe thrombocytopenia refers to thrombocyte less than 20*10^9/L; hyperglycemia refers to blood glucose more than 13.3 mmol/L

Complications During ECMO Note: DIC disseminated intravascular coagulation, CRBSI catheter related bloodstream infection, VAP ventilator associated pneumonia; severe thrombocytopenia refers to thrombocyte less than 20*10^9/L; hyperglycemia refers to blood glucose more than 13.3 mmol/L

Comparison between the patients successfully and unsuccessfully weaned from ECMO

Group 1 contained 14 patients who were successfully weaned from ECMO, and group 2 included 21 patients who were unsuccessfully weaned from ECMO. Compared with patients successfully weaned from ECMO, the unsuccessfully weaned group had a higher mortality (100% vs. 7.1%, respectively, P < 0.01), and was older (60 ± 12 years vs. 51 ± 10 years, respectively, P = 0.02), and more likely to have diabetes mellitus (57.1% vs. 7.1%, respectively, P < 0.01), had more frequent severe conditions (SOFA: 10 ± 4 points vs. 7 ± 2 points, respectively, P < 0.01) pre-ECMO. Meanwhile, they had a longer duration of IPPV (6 ± 4 d vs. 2 ± 1 d, respectively, P < 0.01), had lower PaO2/FiO2 levels (71.4 ± 20.0 mmHg vs. 89.3 ± 24.2 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.05), and higher rate of rescue ventilation strategies (81% vs. 43.9%, respectively, P < 0.05) before ECMO support. No significant differences were found in the total duration of IPPV, total duration of ECMO, length of ICU stay and length of hospitalization between the two groups (Table 1).

Blood flow in patients on ECMO

ECMO blood flow did not significantly differ between the two groups during the initiation of ECMO support. However, in the successfully weaned group vs. the unsuccessfully weaned group, a significant decrease in blood flow correlated with an increase in the duration of support, which was 3.65 ± 0.70 L/min vs. 4.57 ± 1.02 L/min, respectively, (P < 0.05) at 72 h on ECMO and 3.65 ± 0.86 L/min vs. 4.62 ± 0.90 L/min, respectively, (P < 0.01) at 96 h on ECMO (Additional files 1 and 2).

IPPV parameters in patients on ECMO

In the successfully weaned group compared to the unsuccessfully weaned group, FiO2 was 46 ± 13% vs. 74 ± 25%, respectively, (P < 0.01) at 48 h and 45 ± 11% vs. 78 ± 24%, respectively, (P < 0.01) at 72 h on ECMO; monitored Pplat was 21 ± 3 cmH2O vs. 25 ± 5 cmH2O, respectively, (P < 0.05) at 48 h, and 19 ± 4 cmH2O vs. 29 ± 6 cmH2O, respectively, (P < 0.01) at 72 h on ECMO; and monitored VT was 246 ± 93 ml vs. 343 ± 96 ml, respectively, (P < 0.05) at 48 h, and 236 ± 113 ml vs. 356 ± 116 ml, respectively, (P < 0.05) at 72 h on ECMO; all of the differences were statistically significant (Fig. 2, Additional file 1).
Fig. 2

Comparison of IPPV parameters and ABGs between two groups of patients on ECMO. For the successfully weaned group compared to the unsuccessfully weaned group, FiO2 was 46 ± 13% vs. 74 ± 25%, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.01) and 45 ± 11% vs. 78 ± 24%, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.01). The monitored Pplat was 21 ± 3 cmH2O vs. 25 ± 5 cmH2O, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.05) and 19 ± 4 cmH2O vs. 29 ± 6 cmH2O, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.01). The monitored VT was 246 ± 93 ml vs. 343 ± 96 ml, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.05) and 236 ± 113 ml vs. 356 ± 116 ml, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.05) after ECMO support. However, there were no differences in PEEP during ECMO between the two groups. Patients who were in the unsuccessfully weaned group compared to patients in the successfully weaned group had severe acidosis (pH: 7.29 ± 0.14 vs. 7.40 ± 0.05, respectively, (P < 0.01), a higher PaCO2 (57.0 ± 16.7 mmHg vs. 43.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, respectively, (P < 0.05), and a higher lactate concentration (3.6 ± 2.1 mmol/L vs. 1.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, respectively (P < 0.05), pre-ECMO. The pH and PaCO2 did not significantly differ between the two groups during ECMO therapy, while patients who eventually weaned successfully from ECMO had a gradual ascending tendency in PaO2 at 48 and 72 h on ECMO and a sustained low level of lactate after ECMO therapy

Comparison of IPPV parameters and ABGs between two groups of patients on ECMO. For the successfully weaned group compared to the unsuccessfully weaned group, FiO2 was 46 ± 13% vs. 74 ± 25%, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.01) and 45 ± 11% vs. 78 ± 24%, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.01). The monitored Pplat was 21 ± 3 cmH2O vs. 25 ± 5 cmH2O, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.05) and 19 ± 4 cmH2O vs. 29 ± 6 cmH2O, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.01). The monitored VT was 246 ± 93 ml vs. 343 ± 96 ml, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.05) and 236 ± 113 ml vs. 356 ± 116 ml, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.05) after ECMO support. However, there were no differences in PEEP during ECMO between the two groups. Patients who were in the unsuccessfully weaned group compared to patients in the successfully weaned group had severe acidosis (pH: 7.29 ± 0.14 vs. 7.40 ± 0.05, respectively, (P < 0.01), a higher PaCO2 (57.0 ± 16.7 mmHg vs. 43.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, respectively, (P < 0.05), and a higher lactate concentration (3.6 ± 2.1 mmol/L vs. 1.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, respectively (P < 0.05), pre-ECMO. The pH and PaCO2 did not significantly differ between the two groups during ECMO therapy, while patients who eventually weaned successfully from ECMO had a gradual ascending tendency in PaO2 at 48 and 72 h on ECMO and a sustained low level of lactate after ECMO therapy

Improvement in circulatory and respiratory physiological indicators on ECMO

The vital signs were improved but did not significantly differ between the two groups pre-ECMO and during ECMO support (Additional file 3). Patients who were unsuccessfully weaned from ECMO compared to patients who were successfully weaned from ECMO had severe acidosis (pH: 7.29 ± 0.14 vs. 7.40 ± 0.05, respectively, (P < 0.01), a higher PaCO2 (57.0 ± 16.7 mmHg vs. 43.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, respectively, (P < 0.05), and a higher lactate concentration (3.6 ± 2.1 mmol/L vs. 1.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, P < 0.05) pre-ECMO. pH and PaCO2 did not differ significantly between the two groups during ECMO support, while patients who were eventually successfully weaned from ECMO had a gradual ascending tendency of PaO2 at 48 and 72 h on ECMO and a sustained low level of lactate (Fig. 2, Additional file 1).

Changes in anticoagulation on ECMO

During the early stage of ECMO (24 and 48 h), the successful weaning group showed smaller differences between the ACTmax and ACTmin than the unsuccessful weaning group, which was 48 ± 20 s vs. 104 ± 35 s at 24 h (P < 0.05) and 40 ± 25 s vs. 98 ± 40 s at 48 h (P < 0.01). However, this trend was not found with regard to the difference between the maximum and minimum APTT.

Complications during ECMO

There were no differences between the two groups in mechanical complications associated with ECMO, VAP and barotrauma. The successfully weaned group compared to the unsuccessfully weaned group had a lower haemorrhage rate (28.6% vs. 77.3%, respectively, P < 0.01), lower rate of renal insufficiency (21.4% vs. 63.6%, respectively, P < 0.05), lower rate of liver failure (0% vs. 40.9%, respectively, P < 0.01) and lower heart failure rate (35.7% vs. 77.3%, respectively, P < 0.05).

Discussion

This study was the first to systematically and comprehensively discuss as well as elaborate on the current application of the efficacy and safety of ECMO in patients with H7N9 pneumonia-related ARDS. A few studies [17, 20, 21, 22] have shown that the mortality of pH1N1-induced ARDS was reduced to 21–61% following ECMO treatment. Presently, no studies with large samples have investigated the mortality of H7N9-induced ARDS, while the in-hospital mortality was as high as 63% in our study. Late initiation of ECMO, inappropriate IPPV settings during ECMO, and more ECMO complications might explain the relatively high mortality. Moreover, as a multicentre collaboration study, the experiences of ECMO varied among the centres (Additional file 4), which might be another reason for the high mortality. According to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) data [23, 24], ECMO is indicated when death risk exceeds 80%, i.e., when PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg on FiO2 > 90% and the Murray score is 3–4. Our patients met the indications for ECMO support. The duration of MV for more than 7 days pre-ECMO is an important prognostic factor for death [25]. For patients in the successfully weaned group, the duration of IPPV pre-ECMO was 5 ± 1 d; however, the duration was even longer among patients in the unsuccessfully weaned group (6 ± 4 d). Moreover, rescue ventilation strategies were implemented for most patients before ECMO, which partially delayed the timing of ECMO. In comparison, ECMO was initiated at 2 h (1–5 h) after IPPV among patients with pH1N1 in Australia and New Zealand in 2009 [5], which was significantly shorter than that in our cases. Therefore, we emphasized early implementation of ECMO in our patients. The principle of IPPV during ECMO is the “lung rest strategy” [26]. The REVA registry study examined 123 patients with pH1N1-induced ARDS [6] and showed that the high Pplat (29 cmH2O) on day 1 of ECMO was related to high mortality. In our study, the pre-ECMO Pplat level was high (29 ± 8 cmH2O). High Pplat can lead to overdistension of the alveoli and cause lung volutrauma. The shear force between the overdistended and collapsed alveoli further aggregates VILI [27], which ultimately increases mortality. Although the Pplat values decreased to different degrees after ECMO, the Pplat of the unsuccessfully weaned group was significantly higher at 48 and 72 h during ECMO. The principle of low VT was similar in that we found a lower VT during ECMO in the successfully weaned group. A retrospective observational study of 168 patients with severe ARDS [28] showed that a high PEEP level within 3 d of being on ECMO was related to decreased mortality. Although no difference was observed in the PEEP levels between the two groups, we speculated that the down-regulation of PEEP during ECMO might have further aggravated the occurrence of collapse-induced injury, which led to atelectasis and sputum discharge obstacles. Therefore, the IPPV parameters, including high Pplat and VT levels and low PEEP settings, might have been unreasonable in our study; lung rest or the maintenance of open alveoli was not achieved. The incidence of an ECMO oxygenator thrombus, haemorrhage, and organ failure in our study was high, which suggests that some problems existed in the anticoagulation management and organ supportive treatment of ECMO. We found that the unsuccessfully weaned group had larger fluctuations in ACT (the difference between ACTmax and ACTmin were larger) during the early stage of anticoagulation. This effect might suggest relatively unstable anticoagulation and a higher risk of haemorrhage. Moreover, the incidence rate of VAP during ECMO was as high as 60% and was partially attributed to the long course of H7N9 pneumonia and the prolonged duration of IPPV. Therefore, intensification of airway management was extremely necessary. Our study had limitations. The nature of the study required the collection of data at multiple consecutive time points to evaluate the efficacy of ECMO. As a retrospective study with some missing data, we were unable to successfully collect data at 6 h pre-ECMO and 24, 48, and 72 h post-ECMO. Additionally, the number of subjects was too small to perform a multiple regression analysis to explore the risk factors for unsuccessful weaning from ECMO.

Conclusions

ECMO is effective at improving oxygenation and ventilation of patients with avian influenza A (H7N9)-induced severe ARDS. Early initiation of ECMO with appropriate IPPV settings and anticoagulation strategies are necessary to reduce complications. Blood flow during ECMO, changes in IPPV parameters and physiological indicators pre-ECMO and during ECMO. (DOCX 107 kb) Blood flow during ECMO between the two groups. In the successfully weaned group vs. the unsuccessfully weaned group, a significant decrease in ECMO blood flow correlated with an increase in the duration of support, which was 3.65 ± 0.70 L/min vs. 4.57 ± 1.02 L/min, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.05) and 3.65 ± 0.86 L/min vs. 4.62 ± 0.90 L/min, respectively, at 96 h (P < 0.01). (TIFF 185 kb) Changes in vital signs pre-ECMO and during ECMO between the two groups. Vital signs were improved and did not significantly differ between the two groups during ECMO. (TIFF 204 kb) ECMO Cases Per Year for Each Hospital. (DOCX 60 kb)
  26 in total

1.  Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: One size does not fit all.

Authors:  Katherine J Deans; Peter C Minneci; Xizhong Cui; Steven M Banks; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Extracorporeal support for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Simon J Finney
Journal:  Eur Respir Rev       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Is Extracorporeal Circulation the Future of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management?

Authors:  Alain Combes; Antonio Pesenti; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pandemic influenza A(H1N1)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study and propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Tài Pham; Alain Combes; Hadrien Rozé; Sylvie Chevret; Alain Mercat; Antoine Roch; Bruno Mourvillier; Claire Ara-Somohano; Olivier Bastien; Elie Zogheib; Marc Clavel; Adrien Constan; Jean-Christophe Marie Richard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew Davies; Daryl Jones; Michael Bailey; John Beca; Rinaldo Bellomo; Nikki Blackwell; Paul Forrest; David Gattas; Emily Granger; Robert Herkes; Andrew Jackson; Shay McGuinness; Priya Nair; Vincent Pellegrino; Ville Pettilä; Brian Plunkett; Roger Pye; Paul Torzillo; Steve Webb; Michael Wilson; Marc Ziegenfuss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material.

Authors:  Niall D Ferguson; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Massimo Antonelli; Antonio Anzueto; Richard Beale; Laurent Brochard; Roy Brower; Andrés Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Andrew Rhodes; Arthur S Slutsky; Jean-Louis Vincent; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  ARDS associated with pneumonia caused by avian influenza A H7N9 virus treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Xiao Tang; Hangyong He; Bing Sun; Jun Wan; Chengjun Ban; Chunyan Zhang; Shuqin Wang; Jingen Xia; Jie Li; Yingmei Liu; Bin Cao; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  A PREGNANT WOMAN WITH AVIAN INFLUENZA A (H7N9) VIRUS PNEUMONIA AND ARDS MANAGED WITH EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION.

Authors:  Guyi Wang; Yanyan Zhou; Subo Gong; Haiyun Dong; Guobao Wu; Xudong Xiang; Jianjun Tang
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.267

9.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Extracorporeal lung support for patients who had severe respiratory failure secondary to influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection in Canada.

Authors:  Darren H Freed; Dietrich Henzler; Chris W White; Robert Fowler; Ryan Zarychanski; Jamie Hutchison; Rakesh C Arora; Rizwan A Manji; Jean-Francois Legare; Tanya Drews; Stasa Veroukis; Murray Kesselman; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  9 in total

1.  COVID-19 outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure vs historical cohort of non-COVID-19 viral infections.

Authors:  Sagar B Dave; Ronald Rabinowitz; Aakash Shah; Ali Tabatabai; Samuel M Galvagno; Michael A Mazzeffi; Raymond Rector; David J Kaczorowski; Thomas M Scalea; Jay Menaker
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 1.581

2.  Indwelling Central Venous Catheters Drive Bloodstream Infection During Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Authors:  Adwaiy Manerikar; Satoshi Watanabe; Viswajit Kandula; Azad Karim; Sanket Thakkar; Mark Saine; Samuel S Kim; Rafael Garza-Castillon; David D Odell; Ankit Bharat; Chitaru Kurihara
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.826

3.  Viral infection in community acquired pneumonia patients with fever: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Ru-Jia Tao; Xiao-Li Luo; Wen Xu; Bei Mao; Ruo-Xuan Dai; Cheng-Wei Li; Li Yu; Fen Gu; Shuo Liang; Hai-Wen Lu; Ke-Bin Chen; Jiu-Wu Bai; Xiao-Bin Ji; Shu-Yi Gu; Xiao-Li Sun; Fa-Hui Dai; Ping Jiang; Wei-Jun Cao; Jin-Fu Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  MELD Score Predicts Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Satoshi Watanabe; Chitaru Kurihara; Adwaiy Manerikar; Sanket Thakkar; Mark Saine; Ankit Bharat
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.826

5.  Glucocorticoid treatment of suspected organizing pneumonia after H7N9 infection: A case report.

Authors:  Huijiao Liu; Jianwei Li; Miaolian Chen; Jiahao Su
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  First successful treatment of a COVID-19 pregnant woman with severe ARDS by combining early mechanical ventilation and ECMO.

Authors:  Liusheng Hou; Mingxing Li; Kai Guo; Weijia Wang; Binfei Li; Jianwei Li; Yong Yuan
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Influenza A: Retrospective Review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Comparing H1N1 With Other Subtypes.

Authors:  Erika R O'Neil; Huiming Lin; Meng Li; Lara Shekerdemian; Joseph E Tonna; Ryan P Barbaro; Jayvee R Abella; Peter Rycus; Graeme MacLaren; Marc M Anders; Peta M A Alexander
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-12-09

8.  Outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Chitaru Kurihara; Adwaiy Manerikar; Catherine Aiyuan Gao; Satoshi Watanabe; Viswajit Kandula; Alexandra Klonis; Vanessa Hoppner; Azad Karim; Mark Saine; David D Odell; Kalvin Lung; Rafael Garza-Castillon; Samuel S Kim; James McCauley Walter; Richard G Wunderink; G R Scott Budinger; Ankit Bharat
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.663

Review 9.  Controversial treatments: An updated understanding of the coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Cantong Zhang; Shaoying Huang; Fengping Zheng; Yong Dai
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 20.693

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.