| Literature DB >> 29310581 |
Linna Huang1, Wei Zhang2, Yi Yang3, Wenjuan Wu4, Weihua Lu5, Han Xue6, Hongsheng Zhao7, Yunfu Wu8, Jia Shang9, Lihua Cai10, Long Liu11, Donglin Liu1, Yeming Wang1, Bin Cao12, Qingyuan Zhan13, Chen Wang1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); Avian influenza A (H7N9); Complications; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); Mortality
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29310581 PMCID: PMC5759204 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2903-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Flowchart. A flowchart illustrating the enrolment of patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus-induced pneumonia who were reported to the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China; patients were admitted to 20 hospitals in 9 provinces of China between October 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017
General conditions and outcomes of patients with ECMO therapy
| Variable | Total ( | Successfully weaned group ( | Unsuccessfully weaned group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, number (%) | ||||
| Male | 23(65.7) | 9(64.3) | 14(66.7) | 1.00 |
| Age, years, mean ± SD | 57 ± 1 | 51 ± 10 | 60 ± 12 | 0.02* |
| Underlying Diseases, number (%) | ||||
| Hypertension | 19(54.3) | 7(50) | 12(57.1) | 0.74 |
| Diabetes | 13(37.1) | 1(7.1) | 12(57.1) | < 0.01* |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 5(14.3) | 3(21.4) | 2(9.5) | 0.37 |
| History of steroid and immunosuppressant within 1 month | 8(22.9) | 4(28.6) | 4(19.0) | 0.69 |
| Pregnancy, number (%) | 1(2.9) | 0(0.0) | 1(47.6) | 1.00 |
| Onset to NAI | 9 ± 5 | 7 ± 3 | 11 ± 6 | 0.04* |
| Onset to ECMO | 10 ± 3 | 10 ± 3 | 10 ± 3 | 0.97 |
| Organ support pre-ECMO | ||||
| High-dose vasoactive drugsa, number (%) | 20(57.1) | 6(42.9) | 14(63.6) | 0.31 |
| Rescue ventilation strategiesb, number (%) | 23(65.7) | 6(43.9) | 17(81.0) | 0.03* |
| Duration of IPPV, days, mean ± SD | 5 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 6 ± 4 | < 0.01* |
| SOFA Score | 9 ± 3 | 7 ± 2 | 10 ± 4 | 0.02* |
| Murray Score | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 0.95 |
| PaO2/FiO2 pre-ECMO, mmHg, mean ± SD | 78 ± 23 | 89 ± 24 | 71 ± 20 | 0.04* |
| Duration of ECMO, days, median (IQR) | 8(5–13) | 10(7–13) | 7(3–16) | 0.48 |
| Total Duration of IPPV, days, mean ± SD | 20 ± 8 | 23 ± 13 | 18 ± 15 | 0.36 |
| Clinical outcomes | ||||
| Mortality, number (%) | 22 (63) | 1 (7.1) | 21 (100) | < 0.01* |
| Length of stay in ICU, days, mean ± SD | 27 ± 14 | 33 ± 12 | 24 ± 14 | 0.081 |
| Length of hospitalization, days, mean ± SD | 31 ± 14 | 39 ± 10 | 27 ± 14 | 0.010* |
Note: ahigh-dose vasoactive drugs [17] infer to: noradrenaline > 0.5 μg/kg/min or dopamine > 20 μg/kg/min; brescue ventilation strategies includes recruitment maneuver (RM), prone position ventilation (PP) and high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)
NAI neuraminidase inhibitors, IPPV invasive positive pressure ventilation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, SOFA score sequential organ failure score, ICU intensive care unit
We made comparison between successfully weaned and unsuccessfully weaned group using t-test, x2 test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and P values <0.05 were considered significant, marked as *
Parameters on ECMO, IPPV parameters and physiological indicators pre and on ECMO
| Variable | 6 h pre-ECMO | 24 h on ECMO | 48 h on ECMO | 72 h on ECMO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood flow (L/min) | – | 3.84 ± 0.87 | 4.48 ± 0.77 | 4.18 ± 1.00 | 0.023* |
| IPPV parameters | |||||
| FiO2 | 94 (55–100) | 50 (40–80) | 45 (40–60) | 46 (40–50) | <0.001* |
| PEEP (cmH2O) | 14 ± 4 | 12 ± 5 | 11 ± 3 | 11 ± 2 | 0.022* |
| VT (ml) | 439 ± 61 | 285 ± 94 | 317 ± 103 | 308 ± 128 | <0.001* |
| Pplat (cmH2O) | 29 ± 8 | 23 ± 6 | 23 ± 5 | 24 ± 7 | 0.004* |
| Physiological indicators | |||||
| Heart Rate (/min) | 103 ± 27 | 90 ± 24 | 85 ± 22 | 90 ± 25 | 0.025* |
| MAP (mmHg) | 84 ± 15 | 87 ± 15 | 81 ± 21 | 94 ± 17 | 0.057 |
| Respiratory Rate (/min) | 31 ± 7 | 19 ± 6 | 16 ± 6 | 16 ± 6 | <0.001* |
| pH | 7.33 ± 0.10 | 7.42 ± 0.10 | 7.39 ± 0.10 | 7.43 ± 0.10 | 0.006* |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 52.4 ± 16.6 | 34.1 ± 9.8 | 38.3 ± 10.5 | 38.2 ± 7.8 | <0.001* |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 56.3 ± 20.9 | 90.0 ± 35.9 | 94.8 ± 45.7 | 104.4 ± 57.5 | <0.001* |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 2.8 ± 1.9 | 3.1 ± 3.7 | 4.0 ± 4.8 | 2.9 ± 2.7 | 0.625 |
Note: ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, IPPV invasive positive pressure ventilation, FiO fraction of inspiration, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, VT tidal volume, P plateau pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, SpO fingertip pulse oxygen saturation, PaCO partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, PaO partial pressure of arterial oxygen
*P < 0.05
Complications During ECMO
| Complications | Our study (%) | ECLS Registry Report (%) [ |
|---|---|---|
| ECMO Mechanical Complications | ||
| Oxygenator failure | 0.0 | 18 |
| Oxygenator thrombosis | 14.3 | 12 |
| Other sites thrombosis | 2.9 | 7.7 |
| Hemorrhage | 45.7 | – |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage | 28.6 | 4.6 |
| Cerebral hemorrhage | 8.6 | 4–8 |
| Other site hemorrhage | 31.4 | – |
| Organ Failure | ||
| Brain death | 8.6 | 3.8 |
| Cerebral infarction | 2.9 | – |
| Epilepsy | 2.9 | – |
| Renal insufficiency | 48.6 | 33.5 |
| Heart failure | 62.9 | 61.8 |
| Arrhythmia with unstable hemodynamics | 5.7 | 18.2 |
| Cardiac arrest | 11.4 | 9.8 |
| Liver failure | 25.7 | – |
| DIC | 8.6 | 3.8 |
| Hemolysis | 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Severe thrombocytopenia | 11.4 | – |
| Nosocomial Infection | ||
| CRBSI | 28.6 | 21.2 |
| Bacteremia of other sources | 5.7 | – |
| VAP | 60.0 | – |
| Urinary infections | 17.1 | – |
| Barotrauma | 8.6 | – |
| Metabolic | ||
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 4 (11.4) | 7.3 |
| Hyperglycemia | 17 (48.6) | 18.2 |
Note: DIC disseminated intravascular coagulation, CRBSI catheter related bloodstream infection, VAP ventilator associated pneumonia; severe thrombocytopenia refers to thrombocyte less than 20*10^9/L; hyperglycemia refers to blood glucose more than 13.3 mmol/L
Fig. 2Comparison of IPPV parameters and ABGs between two groups of patients on ECMO. For the successfully weaned group compared to the unsuccessfully weaned group, FiO2 was 46 ± 13% vs. 74 ± 25%, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.01) and 45 ± 11% vs. 78 ± 24%, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.01). The monitored Pplat was 21 ± 3 cmH2O vs. 25 ± 5 cmH2O, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.05) and 19 ± 4 cmH2O vs. 29 ± 6 cmH2O, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.01). The monitored VT was 246 ± 93 ml vs. 343 ± 96 ml, respectively, at 48 h (P < 0.05) and 236 ± 113 ml vs. 356 ± 116 ml, respectively, at 72 h (P < 0.05) after ECMO support. However, there were no differences in PEEP during ECMO between the two groups. Patients who were in the unsuccessfully weaned group compared to patients in the successfully weaned group had severe acidosis (pH: 7.29 ± 0.14 vs. 7.40 ± 0.05, respectively, (P < 0.01), a higher PaCO2 (57.0 ± 16.7 mmHg vs. 43.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, respectively, (P < 0.05), and a higher lactate concentration (3.6 ± 2.1 mmol/L vs. 1.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, respectively (P < 0.05), pre-ECMO. The pH and PaCO2 did not significantly differ between the two groups during ECMO therapy, while patients who eventually weaned successfully from ECMO had a gradual ascending tendency in PaO2 at 48 and 72 h on ECMO and a sustained low level of lactate after ECMO therapy