Literature DB >> 29308447

Increased Risk of Persistent Glucose Disorders After Control of Acromegaly.

Claire Rochette1, Thomas Graillon2, Frederique Albarel1, Isabelle Morange1, Henry Dufour2, Thierry Brue1, Frederic Castinetti1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Combining surgery and medical treatments allows the control of growth hormone hypersecretion in 80% of cases. Our objective was to determine the rate of acromegaly comorbidities once hypersecretion of growth hormone is controlled.
METHODS: Our retrospective monocentric study was based on 130 patients followed on a regular basis, with acromegaly controlled by medical treatments or cured by surgery or radiation technique. Our main outcome measures were the prevalence of major metabolic complications of acromegaly (diabetes, hypertension, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides) at diagnosis and last follow-up in comparison with French epidemiological data.
RESULTS: As expected, controlling hypersecretion significantly improved the metabolic complications of acromegaly. However, the proportion of patients having at least one metabolic complication of acromegaly at last follow-up (mean, 72 months after remission) was 27% for altered glucose tolerance or diabetes, 39% for hypertension, 34.3% for hypercholesterolemia, and 13.3% for hypertriglyceridemia. Interestingly, our data showed that diabetes was the only comorbidity different with a higher prevalence in patients in remission versus a general population of a similar median age (21.6% vs 6.9%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up of glucose disorders needs to be maintained on a long-term basis in patients controlled for acromegaly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromegaly; diabetes; hypertension; pituitary adenoma; somatostatin; surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29308447      PMCID: PMC5740518          DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocr Soc        ISSN: 2472-1972


Acromegaly is a rare disease generally due to a growth hormone (GH)–secreting pituitary adenoma [1]. Although the prevalence is estimated to be between 40 and 70 cases per million, it is probably underestimated owing to the slow appearance of clinical signs [1]. The overall diagnosis delay is usually 5 to 10 years, which allows for the installation of a number of comorbidities. As a rule, these are already present at the time acromegaly is diagnosed. The longstanding increase of GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels is responsible for polymorphic metabolic complications. For instance, the increase of GH levels is responsible for insulin resistance in the liver and other peripheral tissues, leading to impaired glucose tolerance or overt diabetes mellitus [2, 3]. GH excess may also alter the lipid profile, with increased triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels [4, 5]. This metabolic profile, together with arterial hypertension, induces an increased overall risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in acromegalic patients [6]. Additionally, cardiovascular dysfunction may be linked to a specific cardiomyopathy with initial left ventricular hypertrophy, evolving to a dilated cardiomyopathy [1]. Of note, patients with acromegaly also frequently develop respiratory disorders such as sleep apnea, which may worsen the metabolic and cardiovascular complications [1, 7, 8]. Diagnosis and management of such complications are crucial, as acromegaly is progressively becoming a chronic disease, with <50% of all cases of acromegaly cured at last follow-up, but almost 80% to 90% controlled by multimodal treatments including antisecretory drugs [9, 10]. The comorbidities associated with acromegaly are known to lead to an impaired quality of life and an average 10-year reduction in life expectancy in untreated patients compared with the general population, mainly due to cardiovascular disease [11]. A still debated question is the persistence of such comorbidities on a long-term basis once the control of hypersecretion is obtained. The aim of our study was to try to give insights on this point, based on 130 patients with acromegaly in remission or controlled and followed in a single French center, in comparison with French epidemiological data.

1. Subjects and Methods

Data on patients followed regularly in the Department of Endocrinology, La Timone Hospital (Marseille, France) and then La Conception Hospital (Marseille, France) were retrieved through the last 15 years. The diagnosis of acromegaly was based on unsuppressed GH level after OGTT (>1.2 mUI/L) and increased IGF-1 value for age and sex. Patients were included at the first time they had both suppressed GH after OGTT (<1.2 mUI/L) or a mean of GH values (every 15 minutes during 2 hours) < 1 ng/mL (in patients with diabetes) and normal IGF-1 for age and sex (after surgery or radiation techniques, or normal IGF-1 while on medical treatments), and if they had at least one evaluation of the complications before and after hypersecretion control. Each patient gave informed consent for the collection and analysis of individual data. Recorded data at initial diagnosis included sex, age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), pituitary adenoma size (microadenoma or macroadenoma), GH and IGF-1, treatment modalities and time to obtain normal hormone levels, and pituitary deficiencies. The results of hormonal evaluations performed every 3 to 12 months during follow-up were also noted. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of acromegaly metabolic and cardiovascular complications at diagnosis of acromegaly, and after long-term remission. During follow-up, several complications were thus regularly evaluated and data were retrieved from medical files: (1) Metabolic complications included BMI, fasting blood glucose level and after OGTT, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting glucose level ≥1.26 g/L or ≥2 g/L after an OGTT. High fasting blood glucose level was defined as fasting glucose level between 1.1 and 1.26 g/L and impaired glucose tolerance as glucose level between 1.4 and 2 g/L after OGTT. At each time point, the modalities of treatments given to control blood glucose were also noted. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as fasting LDL ≥1.6 g/L, and hypertriglyceridemia as fasting triglyceride level ≥1.5 g/L. (2) Cardiovascular complications included high blood pressure levels and myocardial hypertrophy as determined by echocardiography. High blood pressure was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg. At each time point, the modalities of treatments given to control blood pressure were also noted. Myocardial hypertrophy was defined as a left ventricular wall thickness >13 mm. Data on myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular disease were also noted. As a comparison, we used the publicly available data of two large French epidemiological studies. The French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS) was designed to describe dietary intakes, nutritional status, and physical activity in the French population, including 3- to 17-year-old children and 18- to 74-year-old adults. In adults, health examinations that included anthropometry and blood pressure measurements and blood, urine, and hair samples were performed using standardized procedures that took place at either a French Social Security Health Examination Center or at the subject’s home (nurse visit). A total of 3115 adults were included in this study [12-14]. The Mona Lisa study was an epidemiological multicenter cross-sectional population-based study aimed at assessing the prevalence and treatments of cardiovascular risk factors. The data of a total of 4609 inhabitants randomly included from three French areas, aged 35 to 74 years, were analyzed in this study [15].

A. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data are presented as the median (minimum, maximum). Categorical data are summarized as the count and percentage in each category. Univariate comparisons between groups were made by a two-tailed Student unpaired t test or analysis of variance for continuous variables (variance equality was verified by the Levene test and Welch correction was applied when necessary). A two-tailed Pearson χ2 or Fisher’s exact test were used for comparison of qualitative data. Variables with a P value < 0.25 were selected for the multivariate analysis as well as interactions between covariates. Forward stepwise logistic regression analysis was used for multivariate studies, with selection based on likelihood ratio. The remaining covariates were considered significant when the P value was <0.05. All statistical tests were performed with XLSTAT version 2013.4.05 (Addinsoft, Paris, France).

2. Results

A. General Characteristics of the Population

Out of 218 patients’ files evaluated, 38 patients (17.5%) were not included, as they were still uncontrolled at last follow-up. Seven patients (3.2%) were not included, as they presented a mixed GH–adrenocorticotropic hormone or GH-thyrotropin adenoma, or McCune–Albright or Carney syndrome–associated acromegaly. At last follow-up, 173 patients (79.3%) were in remission: 43 of them were not included due to missing presurgical complications data. A total of 130 patients, 75 females (57.7%) and 55 males (42.3%), were thus included in this retrospective study. Remission was obtained by surgery in 73 patients (56.1%) and only by medical treatments in 34 patients (26.2%). Radiation therapy was performed in 23 patients (17.7%). Mean time to obtain remission was 18 ± 19 months. Mean follow-up after remission was 72 ± 58 months. A flowchart of the study is depicted in Fig. 1. General characteristics of this cohort are given in Table 1.
Figure 1.

Flowchart of the study. Glucose disorders, hypertension, triglycerides, LDL: percentage of patients with the complication at the diagnosis of acromegaly.

Table 1.

Initial Characteristics of the Population

Number of Patients130
Sex ratio (F/M)75/55 (57.7%/42.3%)
Microadenoma/macroadenoma30/100 (23%/77%)
Time to remission, mo (mean ± SD)18 ± 19
Time between remission and last follow up (mean±SD months)72 ± 58
Secretory characteristics
 Pure GH adenoma95
 Mixed GH-prolactin adenoma35
Pituitary deficiency at remission
 Adrenocorticotropic hormone7
 LH/follicle-stimulating hormone12
 Thyrotropin33

Note that data on initial pituitary evaluation could not be retrieved for 11 patients.

Abbreviations: M, male; F, female; SD, standard deviation.

Flowchart of the study. Glucose disorders, hypertension, triglycerides, LDL: percentage of patients with the complication at the diagnosis of acromegaly. Initial Characteristics of the Population Note that data on initial pituitary evaluation could not be retrieved for 11 patients. Abbreviations: M, male; F, female; SD, standard deviation.

B. Metabolic and Cardiovascular Comorbidities

In the whole cohort, three patients (2.3%) aged 58, 63, and 70 years at diagnosis, suffered from a myocardial infarction, and five (3.8%) aged 51, 52, 60, 61, and 63 years presented a stroke. Among these eight patients, three presented the cardiovascular event before remission (mean, 14.7 months) and five after remission (mean, 49.8 months). Overall, 40 patients (30.8%) could be considered at high cardiovascular risk at diagnosis as they presented at least two metabolic disorders; the rate (28.5%) was slightly decreased at last follow-up (P = 0.67). As shown in Table 2, there was no statistical difference between the metabolic profiles of patients who presented at least one pituitary deficiency vs patients with normal pituitary function at last follow-up.
Table 2.

Comparison of Metabolic Data in Patients With or Without Pituitary Deficiency

At Least One Pituitary DeficiencyNo Pituitary Deficiency
Glucose disorders40% (14/35)42.9% (33/77)
Hypertension33.3% (12/36)47.3% (35/74)
Hypercholesterolemia38.2% (13/34)37.1% (23/62)
Hypertriglyceridemia37.5% (12/32)22% (13/59)

No significant differences were observed.

Comparison of Metabolic Data in Patients With or Without Pituitary Deficiency No significant differences were observed.

B-1. Glucose disorders

At diagnosis, 24 of 112 patients (21.4%) had glucose intolerance or high fasting blood glucose level, and 23 (20.5%) had diabetes. Comparison between patients with or without normal blood glucose level found a significant difference in terms of age (48.1 ± 14.8 years vs 43.2 ± 13 years in both groups, respectively; P = 0.048), IGF-1 (3.6 ± 1.4-fold vs 3.1 ± 1-fold upper normal value, P = 0.045) but not in sex ratio (P = 0.86) or in BMI (26.9 ± 3.7 vs 26.7 ± 5.3, P = 0.86). Comparison of glucose status with French epidemiological data (Table 3, ENNS study, comparable mean age and sex ratio) showed a much higher prevalence of diabetes (20.5% vs 5.1%) in our cohort at diagnosis.
Table 3.

Comparison of Metabolic Data in Our Study and in the Two Main French Sets of Epidemiological Data

ENNS (2006)Current Study:DiagnosisMona Lisa (2007)Current Study:Last Follow-up
Mean age, y44 (18–74)45.7 (13–81)55 (35–74)51.8 (20–82)
Sex ratio, % female/male63/3758/4250/5058/42
Number of people/patients31151304609130
Overweight or obesity47.1%58%NANA
Hypertension31%42.7%49.9%39%
 Mean systolic blood pressure, mmHg ± SD124 ± 10131 ± 19134 ± 21123 ± 13
 Mean diastolic blood pressure, mmHg ± SD78 ± 977 ± 1281 ± 1174 ± 9
Hypercholesterolemia29.7%37.5%31.3%34.3%
 Mean LDL level, g/L ± SD1.27 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.351.2 ± 0.3
HypertriglyceridemiaNA27.5%22.3%13.3%
 Mean triglyceride level, g/L ± SD1.2 ± 0.71 ± 0.61 ± 0.6
Diabetes5.1%20.5%6.9%21.6%

Abbreviations: NA, not available; SD, standard deviation.

Comparison of Metabolic Data in Our Study and in the Two Main French Sets of Epidemiological Data Abbreviations: NA, not available; SD, standard deviation. At last follow-up, 4 of 74 patients (5.4%) had glucose intolerance or high fasting blood glucose level, and 16 of 74 (21.6%) had diabetes (P < 0.0001 vs diagnosis for all types of glucose disorders). Of note, 28.6% of the patients who presented persistent glucose disorders after remission needed to increase their dose of antidiabetic treatment during follow-up after remission. Comparison of glucose status with French epidemiological data (Table 3, Mona Lisa study, comparable mean age with the one of our cohort) showed a much higher prevalence of diabetes (21.6% vs 6.9%) in our cohort. Of note, at last follow-up, after excluding patients who had been controlled by radiation techniques, 41.2% of patients (7 of 17) who were controlled by somatostatin analogs had blood glucose disorders. In contrast, only 20.5% of patients (9 of 44) cured by surgery presented with glucose disorders (P = 0.23).

B-2. Blood pressure levels and left ventricular hypertrophy

At diagnosis, 47 of 110 patients (42.7%) had hypertension. Comparison between patients with and without hypertension did not find any significant difference in terms of sex ratio (P = 0.37), IGF-1 (3.1 ± 1.2-fold vs 3.3 ± 1.1-fold upper normal value, P = 0.36) or BMI (26.8 ± 5.9 vs 26.8 ± 3.9, P = 0.96). Patients with hypertension were significantly older (mean, 53.5 ± 12.4 vs 41.2 ± 13 years, P < 0.001). Of note, 23% presented left ventricular hypertrophy and 55% of them had hypertension. Comparison of hypertension status with French epidemiological data (Table 3, ENNS study) showed a higher prevalence of hypertension (42.7% vs 31%) in our cohort at diagnosis. At last follow-up, 27 of 69 (39%) presented hypertension (P = 0.003 vs diagnosis). Interestingly, therapeutic intensification was necessary in 15% of them during follow-up after remission. Of note, 17% had left ventricular hypertrophy and 73% of them had hypertension (P < 0.001 for diagnosis vs remission). Comparison of hypertension status with French epidemiological data (Table 3, Mona Lisa study) showed a lower prevalence (39% vs 49.9%) in our cohort than in the general population (note that sex ratio in the Mona Lisa study included a higher percentage of males (50% vs 42% in our cohort).

B-3. Cholesterol

At diagnosis, 36 of 96 patients (37.5%) had high LDL level. Sex ratio (P = 0.82), IGF-1 (2.9 ± 1.1-fold vs 3.4 ± 1.3-fold upper normal value, P = 0.1), and BMI (27.7 ± 5.6 vs 26.4 ± 4.2, P = 0.25) were not significantly different between patients with or without hypercholesterolemia. Patients with high LDL cholesterol were significantly older (50.8 ± 13.9 years vs 43.7 ± 13.7 years, P = 0.009). At last follow-up, 23 of 67 patients (34.3%) had a high cholesterol level (P = 0.003 vs diagnosis). Comparison with French epidemiological data showed a higher prevalence at diagnosis (37.5% vs 18.8%), but a similar prevalence at last follow-up (34.3% vs 31%) in our cohort (Table 3).

B-4. Triglycerides

At diagnosis, 25 of 91 patients (27.5%) had high triglyceride levels. IGF-1 (3.7 ± 1.3-fold vs 3.1 ± 1.2-fold upper normal value, P = 0.03) and BMI (30.4 ± 5.9 vs 25.9 ± 3.8, P = 0.0001) were significantly increased in comparison with normotriglyceridemic patients. Age (49 ±15.9 years vs 44.9 ± 13.6 years, P = 0.13) and sex ratio (P = 0.66) were not significantly different. At last follow-up, 9 of 60 patients (15%) had hypertriglyceridemia (P = 0.0027 vs diagnosis, P = 0.58 vs remission). Comparison with French epidemiological data showed a lower prevalence at last follow-up (13.3% vs 22.3%) in our cohort (which included more females than in the general population) (Table 3). Of note, among 72 patients with optimal lipid profile at last follow-up, 10 (13.9%) were on medications for dyslipidemia.

3. Discussion

Acromegaly increases the risk of long-term diabetes whatever the final GH status. In our series, glucose disorder was indeed the only comorbidity that was more prevalent in patients in remission than in the general population. Whereas Carmichael et al. [16] had already shown that the risk of diabetes was higher in biochemically uncontrolled patients compared with their controlled counterparts, our data show that the risk of diabetes is higher in controlled or cured patients compared with the general population. Given the potential impact of the medical treatments of acromegaly on glucose metabolism, it is crucial for endocrinologists to better know the spontaneous outcome of diabetes in patients with acromegaly. Interestingly, although not significant, the rate of glucose disorders seemed higher in patients controlled with medical treatments than in patients cured by surgery (41.2% vs 20.5%, respectively; P = 0.23). Diabetes is one of the major comorbidities reported in patients with acromegaly: the association of the glycemic effects of insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and increased gluconeogenesis leads to the development of diabetes in subjects usually lean or mildly overweight (mean BMI, 26.5 kg/m2 in our study) [17, 18]. At diagnosis, our prevalence data of glucose disorders is close to the ones reported by Dal et al. [19] (fourfold increased risk) and Dreval et al. [20] (3.5-fold increased risk) with a 4.5-fold increased risk compared with the French population. The rate of diabetes was even higher in the 38 patients with uncontrolled acromegaly at last follow-up, not included in the study (eightfold increased risk). Fieffe et al. [21] had previously reported based on the French Acromegaly registry that 22.3% of 519 patients with acromegaly had diabetes at diagnosis, and that this glycemic status was correlated with age, BMI, and hypertension, but not with the level of GH and IGF-1. These results are in contrast with ours, as the glycemic status of our patients was correlated with age and IGF-1, but not BMI. Contradictory data were also reported for IGF-1 as a predictor of glycemic status [2, 3, 22]. Based on 148 patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly, Alexopoulou et al. [23] had shown that a family history of diabetes and IGF-1 was associated with hyperglycemia, whereas BMI and IGF-1 were associated with insulin resistance. This discrepancy probably suggests that other modifying factors modulate the overall risk of diabetes in patients with acromegaly. More interestingly, our data show that the increased risk of glucose disorders persists in patients with acromegaly despite long-term remission (mean, 72 months) when the prevalence data are compared with those of a population of a comparable age and from the same geographical area. Jonas et al. [24] had reported in 57 patients with acromegaly that at the last visit, >58% of patients had glucose disorders (in comparison with 50% at diagnosis), but the study included patients who were not controlled for acromegaly. Kinoshita et al. [25] had previously shown that the persistence of glucose disorders was due to an altered β-cell function at the time of diagnosis, concordant with the fact that older patients at diagnosis were at higher risk of persistent diabetes, as shown in our study. Glucose disorders should thus be monitored closely on a long-term basis after the control of GH hypersecretion. Patients with controlled acromegaly remain at high cardiovascular risk factor. Apart from the glycemic status, dyslipidemia (34% and 13% of high cholesterol and triglyceride levels, respectively, at last follow-up) and hypertension (39% with hypertension at last follow-up) are indeed present in a large proportion of patients with controlled acromegaly, even if these comorbidities do not seem to be more prevalent than in the general population after long-term remission. Interestingly, our prevalence data were quite different from the ones reported by Petrossians et al. [26] in their large study on >3000 patients: they reported 27.5% diabetes (vs 20.5% in our study) and 28.8% (vs 42.7% in our study) hypertension. These differences could not be explained by the age at diagnosis (45.2 years vs 45.7 years), the sex ratio (54.5% vs 57.7% females), or the rate of macroadenoma (72% vs 77%) in the Liège Acromegaly Survey study vs ours, respectively. Differences could thus be explained by other factors of the metabolic profile (BMI for instance) or environmental factors that were not specifically evaluated in both studies. One fourth to one third of patients therefore still present cardiovascular risk factors despite remission of GH hypersecretion. Interestingly, the rate of patients with more than two cardiovascular risk factors is increased compared with the general population: 28.5% vs 20% in our study at last follow-up and in the Mona Lisa study, respectively. Of note, the prevalence of myocardial infarction was similar in our study and French epidemiological data (~2%), whereas the prevalence of stroke was much higher in our patients (3.8% vs 0.6%). Concordant with our results, dos Santos Silva et al. [27] had shown that patients with acromegaly were at low risk of coronary artery disease despite the high prevalence of metabolic abnormalities, whatever the phase (active or controlled) of the disease. This low number, in contrast to the data reported by Holdaway et al. [6], in which out of 72 patients, 50% of deaths were related to cardiovascular diseases and 8% to strokes, is probably explained by the fact that we only focused on controlled patients and not on the whole cohort of patients with acromegaly. To conclude, although acromegaly has progressively become a chronic disease, the way patients should still be followed after cure or once control of hypersecretion is obtained has not been specifically evaluated in international guidelines. As the risk of recurrence can be considered very low, the major remaining issue is the extent to which complications might reverse. Our study clearly shows that despite a prolonged follow-up after remission, some of these complications will persist, emphasizing the need for a specific and regular follow-up of patients at high cardiovascular risk profile. The final prevalence of comorbidities does not seem higher than in the general population, except for glucose disorders, the main parameter that should be closely followed on a long-term basis after remission. This is a highly relevant issue, as about a fourth of the patients have been found to be lost to follow-up after control of hypersecretion [28].
  28 in total

1.  Assessment of sleep apnea syndrome in treated acromegalic patients and correlation of its severity with clinical and laboratory parameters.

Authors:  L Vannucci; P Luciani; E Gagliardi; S Paiano; R Duranti; G Forti; A Peri
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Systemic hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance are independently correlated to the severity of the acromegalic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  A Colao; R Baldelli; P Marzullo; E Ferretti; D Ferone; P Gargiulo; M Petretta; G Tamburrano; G Lombardi; A Liuzzi
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Metabolic syndrome and socioeconomic status in France: The French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS, 2006-2007).

Authors:  M Vernay; B Salanave; C de Peretti; C Druet; A Malon; V Deschamps; S Hercberg; K Castetbon
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  A first national prevalence estimate of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes in France in 18- to 74-year-old individuals: the French Nutrition and Health Survey 2006/2007.

Authors:  C Bonaldi; M Vernay; C Roudier; B Salanave; A Oleko; A Malon; K Castetbon; A Fagot-Campagna
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Outcome of multimodal therapy in operated acromegalic patients, a study in 115 patients.

Authors:  Frédérique Albarel; Frédéric Castinetti; Isabelle Morange; Bernard Conte-Devolx; Jean Gaudart; Henry Dufour; Thierry Brue
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Factors influencing mortality in acromegaly.

Authors:  Ian M Holdaway; Raja C Rajasoorya; Greg D Gamble
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Acromegaly incidence, prevalence, complications and long-term prognosis: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jakob Dal; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Marianne Andersen; Lars Ø Kristensen; Peter Laurberg; Lars Pedersen; Olaf M Dekkers; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Jens Otto L Jørgensen
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.664

8.  Emerging trends in the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly in Canada.

Authors:  Sophie Vallette; Shereen Ezzat; Constance Chik; Ehud Ur; Syed Ali Imran; Stan Van Uum; Juan Rivera; Gudrun Caspar-Bell; Omar Serri
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.478

9.  Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database.

Authors:  Patrick Petrossians; Adrian F Daly; Emil Natchev; Luigi Maione; Karin Blijdorp; Mona Sahnoun-Fathallah; Renata Auriemma; Alpha M Diallo; Anna-Lena Hulting; Diego Ferone; Vaclav Hana; Silvia Filipponi; Caroline Sievers; Claudia Nogueira; Carmen Fajardo-Montañana; Davide Carvalho; Vaclav Hana; Günter K Stalla; Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Réa; Brigitte Delemer; Annamaria Colao; Thierry Brue; Sebastian J C M M Neggers; Sabina Zacharieva; Philippe Chanson; Albert Beckers
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  The association between biochemical control and cardiovascular risk factors in acromegaly.

Authors:  John D Carmichael; Michael S Broder; Dasha Cherepanov; Eunice Chang; Adam Mamelak; Qayyim Said; Maureen P Neary; Vivien Bonert
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.763

View more
  3 in total

1.  Changes in metabolic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors after therapeutic control of acromegaly vary with the treatment modality. Data from the Bicêtre cohort, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Claire Briet; Mirela Diana Ilie; Emmanuelle Kuhn; Luigi Maione; Sylvie Brailly-Tabard; Sylvie Salenave; Bertrand Cariou; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Myokines in Acromegaly: An Altered Irisin Profile.

Authors:  Łukasz Mizera; Jowita Halupczok-Żyła; Katarzyna Kolačkov; Agnieszka Zembska; Jędrzej Grzegrzółka; Diana Jędrzejuk; Marek Bolanowski; Jacek Daroszewski
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 3.  Diabetes Secondary to Acromegaly: Physiopathology, Clinical Features and Effects of Treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Ferraù; Adriana Albani; Alessandro Ciresi; Carla Giordano; Salvatore Cannavò
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.555

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.