Literature DB >> 24591552

Patients lost to follow-up in acromegaly: results of the ACROSPECT study.

B Delemer1, Ph Chanson, L Foubert, F Borson-Chazot, O Chabre, A Tabarin, G Weryha, C Cortet-Rudelli, I Raingeard, Y Reznik, C Reines, S Bisot-Locard, F Castinetti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The complex management of acromegaly has transformed this disease into a chronic condition, with the risk of patients being lost to follow-up. The objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of acromegalic patients lost to follow-up in France and to determine the impact that abandoning follow-up has on the disease and its management.
DESIGN: ACROSPECT was a French national, multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study.
METHODS: Acromegalic patients were considered lost to follow-up if no new information had been entered in their hospital records during the previous 2 years. They were traced where possible, and data were collected by means of a recall visit or questionnaire.
RESULTS: In the study population, 21% of the 2392 acromegalic patients initially followed in 25 tertiary endocrinology centres were lost to follow-up. At their last follow-up visit, 30% were uncontrolled, 33% were receiving medical therapy and 53% had residual tumour. Of the 362 traced, 62 had died and 77% were receiving follow-up elsewhere; the leading reason for abandoning follow-up was that they had not been informed that it was necessary. Our analysis of the questionnaires suggests that they were not receiving optimal follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need to better inform acromegalic patients of the need for long-term follow-up, the absence of which could be detrimental to patients' health, and to develop shared care for what must now be regarded as a chronic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24591552     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-13-0924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  7 in total

1.  A multicenter, observational study of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN) in patients with acromegaly in the United States: 2-year experience from the SODA registry.

Authors:  Roberto Salvatori; Murray B Gordon; Whitney W Woodmansee; Adriana G Ioachimescu; Don W Carver; Beloo Mirakhur; David Cox; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Gender differences and temporal trends over two decades in acromegaly: a single center study in 112 patients.

Authors:  Adriana G Ioachimescu; Talin Handa; Neevi Goswami; Adlai L Pappy; Emir Veledar; Nelson M Oyesiku
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Communication practices and awareness of resources for acromegaly patients among endocrinologists.

Authors:  Susan Polanco-Briceno; Daniel Glass; Cindy Plunkett
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Long-term treatment outcomes of acromegaly patients presenting biochemically-uncontrolled at a tertiary pituitary center.

Authors:  John D Carmichael; Michael S Broder; Dasha Cherepanov; Eunice Chang; Adam Mamelak; Qayyim Said; Maureen P Neary; Vivien Bonert
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.763

5.  Increased Risk of Persistent Glucose Disorders After Control of Acromegaly.

Authors:  Claire Rochette; Thomas Graillon; Frederique Albarel; Isabelle Morange; Henry Dufour; Thierry Brue; Frederic Castinetti
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-11-24

Review 6.  Need for improved monitoring in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Julie M Silverstein
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.335

7.  Do We Need a Specific Guideline for Assessment and Improvement of Acromegaly Patients Adherence?

Authors:  Maria Kamusheva; Alexina Parvanova; Yanitsa Rusenova; Silvia Vandeva; Atanaska Elenkova
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.