| Literature DB >> 29308200 |
John Hong1, Bo Hou1, Jongchul Lim2, Sangyeon Pak1, Byung-Sung Kim1, Yuljae Cho1, Juwon Lee1, Young-Woo Lee1, Paul Giraud1, Sanghyo Lee1, Jong Bae Park3, Stephen M Morris1, Henry J Snaith2, Jung Inn Sohn1, SeungNam Cha1, Jong Min Kim4.
Abstract
Colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) are extremely promising as photovoltaic materials. In particular, the tunability of their electronic band gap and cost effective synthetic procedures allow for the versatile fabrication of solar energy harvesting cells, resulting in optimal device performance. However, one of the main challenges in developing high performance quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs) is the improvement of the photo-generated charge transport and collection, which is mainly hindered by imperfect surface functionalization, such as the presence of surface electronic trap sites and the initial bulky surface ligands. Therefore, for these reasons, finding effective methods to efficiently decorate the surface of the as-prepared CQDs with new short molecular length chemical structures so as to enhance the performance of QDSCs is highly desirable. Here, we suggest employing hybrid halide ions along with the shortest heterocyclic molecule as a robust passivation structure to eliminate surface trap sites while decreasing the charge trapping dynamics and increasing the charge extraction efficiency in CQD active layers. This hybrid ligand treatment shows a better coordination with Pb atoms within the crystal, resulting in low trap sites and a near perfect removal of the pristine initial bulky ligands, thereby achieving better conductivity and film structure. Compared to halide ion-only treated cells, solar cells fabricated through this hybrid passivation method show an increase in the power conversion efficiency from 5.3% for the halide ion-treated cells to 6.8% for the hybrid-treated solar cells.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 29308200 PMCID: PMC5735354 DOI: 10.1039/c6ta06835a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mater Chem A Mater
Fig. 1AFM images of the PbS quantum dot films with (a) TBAI and (b) Hybrid (TBAI + Pyr) passivation, scale bars are 2 μm. The average root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the HB and TBAI CQD films is 4.465 nm and 9.132 nm, respectively. HRTEM images of the PbS quantum dot films with (c) TBAI and (d) hybrid (HB, TBAI + Pyr) passivation, scale bars are equal to 5 nm. Inset: SAED patterns of the corresponding PbS quantum dot films.
Fig. 2Illustrations of the QD assembly patterns for the (a) TBAI and (b) hybrid treated PbS film functionalization.
Fig. 3(a) FT-IR spectra of the pristine CQD film (oleic acids), TBAI and HB ligand exchanged films. (b) Stationary photoluminescence of the HB and TBAI passivated PbS CQD films with an identical thickness. (c) Time-resolved photoluminescence of HB and TBAI passivated PbS CQD films. (d) Photoresponse speeds of the PbS films with HB and TBAI passivation at a bias of 10 V and an incident power density of 4.5 mW cm–2. Photocurrent and decay time (τ) are measured under illumination of a 450 nm laser. The channel length is 5 μm with an Au electrode deposited on the 300 nm SiO2/Si substrate. The inset image shows the actual device.
Fig. 4(a) Illustration of PbS QDSCS by using a layer-by-layer deposition process. (b) Current density-voltage (I–V) characteristics of the HB treated PbS film (red) and the TBAI treated PbS film (black) devices. The power conversion efficiency for the HB device is 6.8%, and that for the TBAI only device is 5.3%. (c) Conductance I–V curves of the HB and TBAI treated films that are deposited onto an Au-patterned SiO2 device. Inset: illustration of the SiO2 devices.
Performance parameters for the QDSCs under AM 1.5 spectral illumination (100 mW cm–2). Average values for each device with standard deviations were collected from 10 devices, and the device area of the solar cells is 0.03 cm2. The values in parenthesis are from the champion PCE cell
|
|
|
| FF | PCE (%) | |
| HB | 23.64 ± 0.63 (23.55) | 0.52 ± 0.01 (0.52) | 127.15 ± 5.48 (132.31) | 0.54 ± 0.02 (0.55) | 6.59 ± 0.13 (6.76) |
| TBAI | 20.60 ± 0.98 (21.36) | 0.50 ± 0.01 (0.49) | 59.73 ± 4.68 (64.12) | 0.50 ± 0.02 (0.51) | 5.15 ± 0.13 (5.28) |