Literature DB >> 29307671

Clinical outcomes of a single-tunnel technique for coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Michael B Banffy1, Carola F van Eck2, Neal S ElAttrache1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large number of surgical techniques have been described to treat acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations. Despite the high success rates with double-tunnel reconstruction, this method has been associated with the risk of coracoid and clavicle fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the first cohort of patients who underwent single-tunnel AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction. It was hypothesized that this technique would result in maintenance of reduction and a minimal risk of fracture of the coracoid and clavicle.
METHODS: All patients who underwent single-tunnel AC joint reconstruction between 2012 and 2015 via the technique with 2-year follow-up were included. Objective outcomes recorded were maintenance of reduction as measured by the CC distance on radiographs, shoulder range of motion, strength, return to sports, and complications. Subjective outcomes included maintenance of reduction on visual inspection and various patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included with a mean age of 41 ± 12 years. Separation types included types III, IV, and V. The mean follow-up period was 29 ± 9 months (range, 16-45 months). The CC distance improved from 37.4 to 30.0 mm on plain radiographs (P = .006), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 67.0 to 90.1 (P = .094), and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score improved from 30.5 to 91.1 (P = .025). Reduction on visual inspection was maintained in 16 patients (94.1%). Regarding sports participation, 14 patients (82.4%) returned to their preinjury level. The most common complication was a prominent suture knot stack, occurring in 3 patients (17.6%), which was removed in all 3 in a second procedure. There were no clavicle or coracoid fractures.
CONCLUSION: The described technique results in satisfactory objective and patient-reported outcomes and return to sports while avoiding coracoid and clavicle fractures.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular; allograft; coracoclavicular; outcomes; reconstruction; single tunnel

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29307671     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  9 in total

1.  Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Kennedy; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Michael J Alaia; Mohammad Samim; Erin F Alaia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Coracoid clavicular tunnel angle is related with loss of reduction in a single-tunnel coracoclavicular fixation using a dog bone button in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Joong-Bae Seo; Dong-Ho Lee; Kyu-Beom Kim; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sircana; Maristella F Saccomanno; Fabrizio Mocini; Vincenzo Campana; Piermarco Messinese; Andrea Monteleone; Andrea Salvi; Alessandra Scaini; Almerico Megaro; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.

Authors:  Gunnar Jensen; Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra; Mireille Al-Ibadi; Katharina Salmoukas; Jan Christoph Katthagen; Helmut Lill; Alexander Ellwein
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-07

5.  Bone tunnel placement influences shear stresses at the coracoid process after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a finite element study and radiological analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; L Dankl; G Kucinskaite; A Kumar; J J Timothy; G Meschke; A J Venjakob; T L Schulte
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Concomitant Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with a Duo-Figure-8 Autogenic Graft Wrapping Technique for Treating Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation.

Authors:  Fu-Ting Huang; Kai-Cheng Lin; Chih-Yang Lin; Wei-Ning Chang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  High grade acromioclavicular injury: Comparison of arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Arrisna Artha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-25

8.  Clavicular Tunnel Complications after Coracoclavicular Reconstruction in Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Coracoid Loop versus Coracoid Tunnel Fixation.

Authors:  Neunghan Jeon; Nam Hong Choi; Joo Hyung Ha; Myonghwhan Kim; Tae Kang Lim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

9.  Computed Tomography-Based Determination of the Optimal Locations of Bone Tunnels for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Lujing Xiong; Xin Zhou; Bingkun Li; Xiaogao Tang; Guo-You Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.