| Literature DB >> 29305388 |
Ryan Z Friedman1, Stacey R Gish2, Holly Brown1, Lindsey Brier1, Nicole Howard2, Tamara L Doering2, Michael R Brent3,4,5.
Abstract
Received wisdom in the field of fungal biology holds that the process of editing a genome by transformation and homologous recombination is inherently mutagenic. However, that belief is based on circumstantial evidence. We provide the first direct measurement of the effects of transformation on a fungal genome by sequencing the genomes of 29 transformants and 30 untransformed controls with high coverage. Contrary to the received wisdom, our results show that transformation of DNA segments flanked by long targeting sequences, followed by homologous recombination and selection for a drug marker, is extremely safe. If a transformation deletes a gene, that may create selective pressure for a few compensatory mutations, but even when we deleted a gene, we found fewer than two point mutations per deletion strain, on average. We also tested these strains for changes in gene expression and found only a few genes that were consistently differentially expressed between the wild type and strains modified by genomic insertion of a drug resistance marker. As part of our report, we provide the assembled genome sequence of the commonly used laboratory strain Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii strain KN99α.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptococcus neoformans strain KN99; Reverse genetics; gene deletion; genome sequence; yeasts
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29305388 PMCID: PMC5844303 DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.300357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Overview of the study design and procedures. The KN99α genome assembly was guided by the H99α genome sequence, as described in Supplemental Methods in File S2.
Variant alleles found in 30 control strains (top), 23 neutrally transformed strains (middle), and six gene deletion strains (bottom)
| 30 Nontransformed | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chr | Pos | Reference | Alternate | AC | Strain | AO | RO | MF (%) | Gene | Effect |
| 4 | 574814 | TAA | TAAA | 1 | WT | 54 | 3 | 95 | 05155 | Promoter |
Chr, chromosome on which the variant occurs; Pos, coordinate of the variant in the KN99α reference genome sequence; Reference, reference allele; Alternate, alternate allele; AC, “alternate count,” the number of strains with the alternate allele; Strain, the strain or strains in which the alternate allele is found; AO, “alternate observations,” the mean number of reads supporting the alternate allele in strains with the alternate allele; RO, “reference observations,” the mean number of reads supporting the reference allele in strains with the alternate allele; MF, “mean fraction,” the mean fraction of reads supporting the alternate allele in strains with the alternate allele; Gene, the name or KN99 gene identifier (CKF44 number) of the gene affected by the variants; Effect, the effect of the variant on the protein encoded by the indicated gene or location in the indicated gene.
Protein-tyrosine-phosphatase.
Hypothetical protein.
Pheromone transporter.
Homolog of S. cerevisiae gene RPP1.
Catalase.
Homolog of S. cerevisiae gene AIM18
Cadmium ion transporter.
Brg1-associated factor b.
Mitochondrial membrane transport.
Homolog of S. cerevisiae gene YKL111C.
Homolog of S. cerevisiae gene ALE1.
Glycine-tRNA ligase.
Aldehyde dehydrogenase.
ATPase.
Homolog of S. cerevisiae gene TIF4632.
Single-stranded DNA binding protein.
Figure 2Evidence from split read alignments for tandem insertions. The top part of each panel shows the expected insertion and the aligned, observed sequence (colored arrows connected by a dotted line indicate the sequence of the read). The bottom part of each panel explains this observation. (A) Multiple insertions of the complete marker cassette with targeting flanks. (B) Partial sequences lacking the terminator and 3′ targeting flank.