Literature DB >> 29304951

Left atrial appendage angiography is associated with the incidence and number of magnetic resonance imaging-detected brain lesions after percutaneous catheter-based left atrial appendage closure.

Andreas Rillig1, Barbara Bellmann2, Carsten Skurk2, David Manuel Leistner2, Karl Georg Haeusler3, Tina Lin4, Rohat Geran5, Luzie Koehler5, Selma Guttmann2, Daniel Steffens2, Mario Kasner2, Philipp Jakob2, Verena Tscholl2, Mattias Roser2, Klaus Lenz6, Kersten Villringer5, Jai-Wun Park2, Jochen B Fiebach5, Ulf Landmesser7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous catheter-based left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a procedure being increasingly performed in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected acute brain lesions (ABLs) as well as potential changes in neurocognitive function after percutaneous LAAC in patients with atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: Brain MRI at 3 T was performed within 24 hours before and after LAAC along with neurologic (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score) and cognitive (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] test) assessment. Acquired MRI sequences included high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging as well as fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.
RESULTS: Successful device implantation was achieved in all 23 patients (age 74.1 ± 10.5 years; 16 male) using the Amulet (n = 18), Occlutech (n = 3), or LAmbre (n = 2) device. Thirty-seven ABLs were detected by MRI in 12 of 23 patients (52%) after LAAC. The number of periprocedural LAA angiographies was significantly higher in patients with ABL than in those without ABL (1.67 ± 0.65 vs 1.18 ± 0.41; P = .048) and was associated with a higher number of ABL (ρ = 0.615; P = .033). Compared to pre-LAAC assessment, post-LAAC MoCA and NIHSS scores revealed similar results. After LAAC, MoCA test (mean 24.1 ± 4.6 vs 23.2 ± 4.6; P = .09) and NIHSS score (mean 1.0 ± 1.7 vs 1.2 ± 1.8; P = .1) were similar between patients with and those without ABL, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRI-detected ABLs are commonly observed after percutaneous LAAC. The number of LAA angiographies is significantly associated with the number of ABLs; however, the clinical implications of ABL have yet to be determined.
Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bleeding; Brain lesion; Brain magnetic resonance imaging; Left atrial appendage closure; Oral anticoagulation; Silent cerebral lesion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29304951     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation : Present evidence, ongoing studies, open questions].

Authors:  K G Häusler; M Endres; U Landmesser
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Catheter Ablation and Cognitive Impairment in Atrial Fibrillation: Another Hit or a Silver Bullet?

Authors:  Lindsey Rosman; Matthew M Burg; Rachel Lampert
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 3.  [Left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  K G Häusler; U Landmesser
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: What is the best practice?

Authors:  Nikolaos Dagres; Tze-Fan Chao; Guilherme Fenelon; Luis Aguinaga; Daniel Benhayon; Emelia J Benjamin; T Jared Bunch; Lin Yee Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Francisco Darrieux; Angelo de Paola; Laurent Fauchier; Andreas Goette; Jonathan Kalman; Lalit Kalra; Young-Hoon Kim; Deirdre A Lane; Gregory Y H Lip; Steven A Lubitz; Manlio F Márquez; Tatjana Potpara; Domingo Luis Pozzer; Jeremy N Ruskin; Irina Savelieva; Wee Siong Teo; Hung-Fat Tse; Atul Verma; Shu Zhang; Mina K Chung; William-Fernando Bautista-Vargas; Chern-En Chiang; Alejandro Cuesta; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; David S Frankel; Yutao Guo; Robert Hatala; Young Soo Lee; Yuji Murakawa; Cara N Pellegrini; Claudio Pinho; David J Milan; Daniel P Morin; Elenir Nadalin; George Ntaios; Mukund A Prabhu; Marco Proietti; Lena Rivard; Mariana Valentino; Alena Shantsila
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-03-23

Review 5.  Systematic review on left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Mammad Mammadov; Abdelrahman Torky; Andrea Auer; Marios Matiakis; Elena Abate; Constantinos Bakogiannis; Stergios Tzikas; Boris Bigalke; Daniel Sedding; Michel Noutsias
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Cerebral Protection Devices during Transcatheter Interventions: Indications, Benefits, and Limitations.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Axel Linke; Norman Mangner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Peter D Schellinger; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Thorsten Steiner; Martin Köhrmann
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 6.967

8.  Impact of atrial fibrillation pattern on outcomes after left atrial appendage closure: lessons from the prospective LAARGE registry.

Authors:  Shinwan Kany; Johannes Brachmann; Thorsten Lewalter; Ibrahim Akin; Horst Sievert; Uwe Zeymer; Jakob Ledwoch; Hüseyin Ince; Dierk Thomas; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Paulus Kirchhof; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.138

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.