Literature DB >> 29303458

Complications following intracranial pressure monitoring in children: a 6-year single-center experience.

Ruichong Ma1, David Rowland1, Andrew Judge2, Amedeo Calisto1, Jayaratnam Jayamohan1,3, David Johnson3, Peter Richards1,3, Shailendra Magdum1,3, Steven Wall3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is an important tool in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium and is used for a wide range of indications. There are many different ICP monitors available, of which fiber-optic intraparenchymal devices are very popular. Here, the authors document their experience performing ICP monitoring from 2005 to 2015 and specifically complication rates following insertion of the Microsensor ICP monitor. METHODS A retrospective case series review of all patients who underwent ICP monitoring over a 10-year period from 2005 to 2015 was performed. RESULTS There were 385 separate operations with an overall complication rate of 8.3% (32 of 385 cases). Hardware failure occurred in 4.2% of cases, the CSF leakage rate was 3.6%, the postoperative hemorrhage rate was 0.5%, and there was 1 case of infection (0.3% of cases). Only patients with hardware problems required further surgery as a result of their complications, and no patient had any permanent morbidity or mortality from the procedure. Younger patients (p = 0.001) and patients with pathologically high ICP (13% of patients with high ICP vs 6.5% of patients with normal ICP; p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to have complications. There was no significant difference in the complication rates between general neurosurgical patients and craniofacial patients (7.6% vs 8.8%, respectively; p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS Intraparenchymal ICP monitoring is a safe procedure associated with low complications and morbidity in the pediatric craniofacial and neurosurgical population and should be offered to appropriate patients to assess ICP with the reassurance of the safety record reported in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICP = intracranial pressure; ICP monitoring; craniosynostosis; intracranial pressure; pediatric; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29303458     DOI: 10.3171/2017.9.PEDS17360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  5 in total

1.  Chiari 1 malformation and raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Rory J Piper; Shailendra A Magdum
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in children.

Authors:  Sarah Hornshøj Pedersen; Nicolas Hernandez Norager; Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Marianne Juhler
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Non-Invasive and Minimally-Invasive Cerebral Autoregulation Assessment: A Narrative Review of Techniques and Implications for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi; Alwyn Gomez; Logan Froese; Trevor Slack; Carleen Batson; Kevin Y Stein; Dean M Cordingley; Arsalan Alizadeh; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Approaches of Pediatric Intensivists in Turkey PICUs: National Survey Results.

Authors:  Nagehan Aslan; Dinçer Yıldızdaş
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2022-07

5.  Impact of Intracranial Hypertension on Outcome of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Pediatric Patients: A 15-Year Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Christos Tsitsipanis; Marianna Miliaraki; Konstantinos Ntotsikas; Dimitrios Baldounis; Emmanouil Kokkinakis; George Briassoulis; Maria Venihaki; Antonios Vakis; Stavroula Ilia
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2022-08-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.