Literature DB >> 29302487

Central round block repair of large breast resection defects: oncologic and aesthetic outcomes.

Russell J Bramhall1, Jason Lee1, Mae Concepcion2, David Westbroek1, Sarah Huf1, Kabir Mohammed1, Paul Thiruchelvam1, Gerald P Gui1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The central round block repair is a volume displacement technique to reconstruct large wide local excision (WLE) defects in breasts with moderate ptosis or hypertrophy. There are limited published data on the outcomes of this technique.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 57 consecutive patients and follow up information obtained from patient records. The volume of breast resection was estimated geometrically from mammography. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed from clinical measurements and panel review of patient photographs.
RESULTS: The median age was 51 [22-86] years and follow-up 5 (1.9-8.4) years. The median specimen resection weight was 50 [25-361] g and tumour size 25 [10-75] mm. Estimated volume of breast excised was 17.8% (6-31%). In total, 12/57 patients had incomplete margins: five patients had re-excision to achieve clear margins and seven required mastectomy. Two patients had local recurrence during the follow-up period, five developed distant metastases. Aesthetic data were completed for 35/50 patients. Twelve (34%) had no measurable asymmetry and 31 (89%) had a nipple position within 2 cm of the original height. Only two patients requested symmetrising surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Central round block reconstruction of large defects after WLE is a safe technique with good aesthetic outcomes. Contralateral symmetrising surgery is not usually required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncoplastic; breast; cancer; mammoplasty; round

Year:  2017        PMID: 29302487      PMCID: PMC5750302          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.06.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  44 in total

1.  Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  R Masetti; P G Pirulli; S Magno; G Franceschini; F Chiesa; A Antinori
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 2.  Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty--Nottingham approach.

Authors:  S J McCulley; R D Macmillan
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2005-10

Review 3.  Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Mark R Somerfield; Jennifer J Griggs; Souzan El-Eid; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Gary H Lyman; Ginny Mason; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Recurrence in the breast following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Vicini; A Recht; A Abner; J Boyages; B Cady; J L Connolly; R Gelman; R T Osteen; S J Schnitt; W Silen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1992

5.  Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Gulcelik; Lutfi Dogan; Mithat Camlibel; Niyazi Karaman; Bekir Kuru; Haluk Alagol; Cihangir Ozaslan
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects.

Authors:  Max H Haloua; Nicole M A Krekel; Henri A H Winters; Derek H F Rietveld; Sybren Meijer; Frank W Bloemers; Monique P van den Tol
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Long-term review of a breast conservation series and patterns of care over 18 years.

Authors:  Susan C Pendlebury; Olga Ivanov; Stuart Renwick; Graham N Stevens
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Six-year follow-up of patients treated with oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: A cohort study.

Authors:  Syed A Kabir; Sheila Stallard; Eva Weiler-Mithoff; James Mansell; Elizabeth Mallon; Julie C Doughty; Laszlo Romics
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Oncoplastic surgery and cancer relapses: cosmetic and oncological results in 489 patients.

Authors:  G Semprini; F Cattin; L Vaienti; M Brizzolari; C Cedolini; P C Parodi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised.

Authors:  R A Cochrane; P Valasiadou; A R M Wilson; S K Al-Ghazal; R D Macmillan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.