| Literature DB >> 29301190 |
Wenjing Bo1,2, Xiaoke Wang3,4, Qianqian Zhang5, Yi Xiao6, Zhiyun Ouyang7.
Abstract
To design and implement policy to manage water quality, it is important to investigate land use and possible sources of pollution. In this study, using Pearson regression analysis, redundancy analysis and multiple regression analysis, we assess the influence of land use and point sources on water quality in the river system in Shunde district in 2000 and 2010. The results show that water quality was related positively with water surface but negatively with impervious and urban greening area. Additionally, water quality was related negatively to point source emissions of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonium-nitrogen (NH₄-N). The total explanatory power of spatial variation of water quality was improved from 43.4% to 60.0% in 2000 and from 31.3% to 57.8% in 2010, respectively, when the influence of point sources was added into redundancy analysis between water quality and land use. Thus, both land use management and point source pollution control should be considered for improving river water quality.Entities:
Keywords: Shunde; land use; point source of pollution; water quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29301190 PMCID: PMC5800150 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The spatial distribution of the 16 sample sites in study area of Shunde district.
Figure A1Mean value of land use characteristics of the river section within the buffer of 100 m–2000 m in 2000 and 2010.
Mean value and t-test results of water quality variables at the sample sites of Shunde district between 2000 and 2010.
| Variables | 2000 | 2010 | 2000–2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | ||||
| pH | 7.83 ± 0.05 | 7.52 ± 0.12 | 8.71 | <0.01 |
| DO | 6.82 ± 0.21 | 6.84 ± 0.34 | −0.15 | 0.87 |
| CODMn | 2.35 ± 0.13 | 2.19 ± 0.13 | 2.16 | 0.04 |
| BOD | 1.31 ± 0.24 | 2.05 ± 0.20 | −5.56 | <0.01 |
| NH4-N | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.39 ± 0.12 | −5.12 | <0.01 |
| Fluoride | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | −6.70 | <0.01 |
DO: dissolved oxygen; CODMn: permanganate index; BOD: biochemical oxygen demand; NH4-N: ammonium-nitrogen.
Figure 2Pearson relationships between water quality and land use types within the 2000 m buffer in 2000 and 2010. “*” and “**” refer that the coefficients (r) are significant at the 0.05 level and at the 0.01 level, respectively.
The dominant land use groups with the maximum explanatory power within 2000 m buffer scale in 2000 and 2010.
| Year | Dominant Variable | Land Use | Dominant Variable | Point Source Pollution + Land Use | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Explained Variance (%) | Total Explained Variance (%) | Cumulative Explained Variance (%) | Total Explained Variance (%) | |||||
| 2000 | Imp | 29.3 | 43.4 | 0.01 | imp | 29.3 | 60.0 | 0.01 |
| Forest | 31.9 | ECOD | 44.9 | |||||
| Nursery | 38.4 | forest | 49.0 | |||||
| Cropland | 41.3 | green land | 54.3 | |||||
| 2010 | Imp | 14.4 | 31.3 | 0.09 | water | 22.6 | 57.8 | 0.03 |
| Green land | 19.7 | ENH4-N | 42.3 | |||||
| Cropland | 23.9 | green land | 45.9 | |||||
| Nursery | 25.0 | ECOD | 48.5 | |||||
Imp: impervious surface; ECOD: chemical oxygen demand emission; ENH4-N: ammonium-nitrogen emission.
Figure 3Redundancy analysis results of land use and water quality at 2000 m buffer in 2000 and 2010. “imp” refers to impervious surface; “DO”, “CODMn”, “BOD” and “NH4-N” refer to dissolved oxygen; permanganate index; biochemical oxygen demand and ammonium-nitrogen, respectively. “ECOD” and “ENH4-N” refer to chemical oxygen demand emission and ammonium-nitrogen emission.
Multiple regression analysis between land use types in 2000 m buffer, point source pollution emissions and water quality indicators.
| Indicator | First | Second | Third | R2 Adj | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Std. Coef. | Factor | Std. Coef. | Factor | Std. Coef. | ||
| CODMn_2000 | Imp | 0.47 * | ECOD | 0.43 * | -- | -- | 0.472 |
| CODMn_2010 | Green land | 0.51 * | ECOD | 0.48 * | -- | -- | 0.472 |
| BOD_2000 | ECOD | 0.59 ** | Green land | 0.31 | Forest | 0.22 | 0.331 |
| BOD_2010 | Nursery | −1.58 | Forest | 1.41 | Green land | 1.05 | 0.274 |
| NH4-N_2000 | Imp | 0.91 ** | Forest | −0.48 | Nursery | 0.41 | 0.536 |
| NH4-N_2010 | ENH4-N | 1.94 * | ECOD | −1.39 | Green land | 1.11 | 0.568 |
| DO_2000 | Forest | −0.48 | ECOD | −0.42 | Nursery | 0.39 | 0.439 |
| DO_2010 | ENH4-N | −0.81 ** | Cropland | −0.23 | Green land | −0.19 | 0.537 |
| Fluoride_2000 | ECOD | 0.62 * | Imp | −0.57 | Water | −0.38 | 0.323 |
| Fluoride_2010 | ENH4-N | 1.56 | ECOD | −0.98 | - | - | 0.338 |
* Coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level; ** Coefficient is significant at the 0.01 level. “Std. Coef.” is the abbreviation of standardized coefficients. “imp” refers to impervious surface; “DO”, “CODMn”, “BOD” and “NH4-N” refer to dissolved oxygen; permanganate index; biochemical oxygen demand and ammonium-nitrogen, respectively. “ECOD” and “ENH4-N” refer to chemical oxygen demand emission and ammonium-nitrogen emission, respectively.