Adrian G Dumitrascu1, M Caroline Burton2, Nancy L Dawson3, Colleen S Thomas4, Lisa M Nordan5, Hope E Greig6, Duaa I Aljabri5, James M Naessens5,7. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 4. Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 5. Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 6. Administration, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 7. Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether use of a patient portal during hospitalization is associated with improvement in hospital outcomes, 30-day readmissions, inpatient mortality, and 30-day mortality. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective propensity score-matched study that included all adult patients admitted to Mayo Clinic Hospital in Jacksonville, Florida, from August 1, 2012, to July 31, 2014, who had signed up for a patient portal account prior to hospitalization (N = 7538). Results: Out of the admitted patients with a portal account, 1566 (20.8%) accessed the portal while in the hospital. Compared to patients who did not access the portal, patients who accessed the portal were younger (58.8 years vs 62.3 years), had fewer elective admissions (54.2% vs 64.1%), were more frequently admitted to medical services (45.8% vs 35.2%), and were more likely to have liver disease (21.9% vs 12.9%) and higher disease severity scores (0.653 vs 0.456). After propensity score matching, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 cohorts with respect to 30-day readmission (P = .13), inpatient mortality (P = .82), or 30-day mortality (P = .082). Conclusion: Use of the patient portal in the inpatient setting may not improve hospital outcomes. Future research should examine the association of portal use with more immediate inpatient health outcomes such as patient experience, patient engagement, medication reconciliation, and prevention of adverse events.
Objectives: To determine whether use of a patient portal during hospitalization is associated with improvement in hospital outcomes, 30-day readmissions, inpatient mortality, and 30-day mortality. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective propensity score-matched study that included all adult patients admitted to Mayo Clinic Hospital in Jacksonville, Florida, from August 1, 2012, to July 31, 2014, who had signed up for a patient portal account prior to hospitalization (N = 7538). Results: Out of the admitted patients with a portal account, 1566 (20.8%) accessed the portal while in the hospital. Compared to patients who did not access the portal, patients who accessed the portal were younger (58.8 years vs 62.3 years), had fewer elective admissions (54.2% vs 64.1%), were more frequently admitted to medical services (45.8% vs 35.2%), and were more likely to have liver disease (21.9% vs 12.9%) and higher disease severity scores (0.653 vs 0.456). After propensity score matching, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 cohorts with respect to 30-day readmission (P = .13), inpatient mortality (P = .82), or 30-day mortality (P = .082). Conclusion: Use of the patient portal in the inpatient setting may not improve hospital outcomes. Future research should examine the association of portal use with more immediate inpatient health outcomes such as patient experience, patient engagement, medication reconciliation, and prevention of adverse events.
Authors: Ruth M Masterson Creber; Lisa V Grossman; Beatriz Ryan; Min Qian; Fernanda C G Polubriaginof; Susan Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Samuel Pannick; Stephanie Archer; Susannah Jane Long; Fran Husson; Thanos Athanasiou; Nick Sevdalis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Daniel M Walker; Jennifer L Hefner; Naleef Fareed; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Anuj K Dalal; Nicholas Piniella; Theresa E Fuller; Denise Pong; Michael Pardo; Nathaniel Bessa; Catherine Yoon; Stuart Lipsitz; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ronald Dendere; Christine Slade; Andrew Burton-Jones; Clair Sullivan; Andrew Staib; Monika Janda Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: William J Gordon; David W Bates; Daniel Fuchs; John Pappas; Sara Silacci; Adam Landman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Hae-Ra Han; Kelly T Gleason; Chun-An Sun; Hailey N Miller; Soo Jin Kang; Sotera Chow; Rachel Anderson; Paul Nagy; Tom Bauer Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Abrar Alturkistani; Ambar Qavi; Philip Emeka Anyanwu; Geva Greenfield; Felix Greaves; Ceire Costelloe Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.428